IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/osfxxx/6cer3_v1.html

Summary-statistics-based power analysis: A new and practical method to determine sample size for mixed-effects modelling

Author

Listed:
  • Murayama, Kou

    (University ofTübingen)

  • Usami, Satoshi
  • Sakaki, Michiko

    (University of Tübingen)

Abstract

This article proposes a summary-statistics-based power analysis --- a practical method for conducting power analysis for mixed-effects modelling with two-level nested data (for both binary and continuous predictors), complementing the existing formula-based and simulation-based methods. The proposed method bases its logic on conditional equivalence of the summary-statistics approach and mixed-effects modelling, paring back the power analysis for mixed-effects modelling to that for a simpler statistical analysis (e.g., one-sample t test). Accordingly, the proposed method allows us to conduct power analysis for mixed-effects modelling using popular software such as G*Power or the pwr package in R and, with minimum input from relevant prior work (e.g., t value). We provide analytic proof and a series of statistical simulations to show the validity and robustness of the summary-statistics-based power analysis and show illustrative examples with real published work. We also developed a web app (https://koumurayama.shinyapps.io/summary_statistics_based_power/) to facilitate the utility of the proposed method. While the proposed method has limited flexibilities compared to the existing methods in terms of the models and designs that can be appropriately handled, it provides a convenient alternative for applied researchers when there is limited information to conduct power analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Murayama, Kou & Usami, Satoshi & Sakaki, Michiko, 2020. "Summary-statistics-based power analysis: A new and practical method to determine sample size for mixed-effects modelling," OSF Preprints 6cer3_v1, Center for Open Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:6cer3_v1
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/6cer3_v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/5eb9b575877c5e01cf3a948f/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/6cer3_v1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Achen, Christopher H., 2005. "Two-Step Hierarchical Estimation: Beyond Regression Analysis," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(4), pages 447-456.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schulz, Lee L. & Schroeder, Ted C. & White, Katharine L., 2012. "Value of Beef Steak Branding: Hedonic Analysis of Retail Scanner Data," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 41(2), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Heisig, Jan Paul & Solga, Heike, 2014. "Skills inequalities in 21 countries: PIAAC results for prime-age adults," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Skill Formation and Labor Markets SP I 2014-503, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    3. Catherine E. de Vries, 2010. "EU Issue Voting: Asset or Liability?," European Union Politics, , vol. 11(1), pages 89-117, March.
    4. Filippa Bono & Maria Francesca Cracolici & Miranda Cuffaro, 2017. "A Hierarchical Model for Analysing Consumption Patterns in Italy Before and During the Great Recession," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 134(2), pages 421-436, November.
    5. Borgna, Camilla, 2017. "Different systems, same inequalities? Post-compulsory education and young adults’ literacy in 18 OECD countries," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 27(4), pages 332-345.
    6. Jordan Silberman & Chun Wang & Shawn T Mason & Steven M Schwartz & Matthew Hall & Jason L Morrissette & Xin M Tu & Janet Greenhut, 2015. "The Avalanche Hypothesis and Compression of Morbidity: Testing Assumptions through Cohort-Sequential Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    7. McNabb, Carolyn Beth & Murayama, Kou, 2021. "Unnecessary reliance on multilevel modelling to analyse nested data in neuroscience: When a traditional summary-statistics approach suffices," OSF Preprints h4s9f, Center for Open Science.
    8. Brown, J. David & Earle, John S. & Gehlbach, Scott, 2009. "Helping Hand or Grabbing Hand? State Bureaucracy and Privatization Effectiveness," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 103(2), pages 264-283, May.
    9. Aurelija Burinskienė & Milena Seržantė, 2022. "Digitalisation as the Indicator of the Evidence of Sustainability in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    10. Krause, Werner & Wagner, Aiko, 2021. "Becoming part of the gang? Established and nonestablished populist parties and the role of external efficacy," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 27(1), pages 161-173.
    11. L. Bryan, Mark & P. Jenkins, Stephen, 2013. "Regression analysis of country effects using multilevel data: a cautionary tale," ISER Working Paper Series 2013-14, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    12. Hug, Simon & Spörri, Franziska, 2011. "Referendums, trust, and tax evasion," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 120-131, March.
    13. Michael Ochsner & Ivett Szalma & Judit Takács, 2020. "Division of Labour, Work–Life Conflict and Family Policy: Conclusions and Reflections," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 103-109.
    14. Katja Möhring & Alexander Schmidt, 2012. "Multilevel tools," German Stata Users' Group Meetings 2012 06, Stata Users Group.
    15. Schaffer, Lena Maria & Spilker, Gabriele, 2013. "Adding Another Level: Individual Responses to Globalization and Government Welfare Policies," Papers 551, World Trade Institute.
    16. Herman G. van de Werfhorst & Anthony Heath, 2019. "Selectivity of Migration and the Educational Disadvantages of Second-Generation Immigrants in Ten Host Societies," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 35(2), pages 347-378, May.
    17. Michael Ochsner & Ivett Szalma & Judit Takács, 2020. "Division of Labour, Work–Life Conflict and Family Policy: Conclusions and Reflections," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 103-109.
    18. repec:osf:osfxxx:h4s9f_v1 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:osfxxx:6cer3_v1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://osf.io/preprints/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.