IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/ecoaaa/1010-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Health Care Reform and Long-Term Care in the Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Erik Schut

    (Erasmus University)

  • Stéphane Sorbe

    (OECD)

  • Jens Høj

    (OECD)

Abstract

The Netherlands, as other OECD countries, faces the challenge of providing high quality health and long-term care services to an ageing population in a cost-efficient manner. In the health care sector, reforms have aimed at introducing more competition. Despite major changes and some positive effects, the reforms run the risk of getting stuck in the middle between a centralised system of state-controlled supply and prices and a decentralised system based on regulated competition, providing insufficient incentives for provision of quality services and expenditure control. The main challenges are to complete the transition to regulated competition in health care provision, to strengthen the role of health insurers as purchasing agents and to secure cost containment in an increasingly demand-driven health care sector. In 2012, reforms expanded the role of the market in the hospital sector and reinforced budget controls. Both measures are not consistent and may jeopardize both objectives. More competitive markets require, at least, provision of good quality information, appropriate financing and better efficiency incentives. In view of population ageing, current policies mean that the cost of long-term care is set to more than double over the coming decades. Insufficient incentives for cost-efficient purchasing of long-term care should be addressed. However, the government?s plan to transfer long-term care purchasing to health insurers is unpromising unless additional measures ensure that insurers bear the associated financial risks. In addition, home care should be further encouraged at the expense of institutional care, while screening and targeting should be improved. This Working Paper relates to the 2012 OECD Economic Survey of the Netherlands (www.oecd.org/eco/surveys/Netherlands. Réforme des soins de santé et soins de longue durée aux Pays-Bas Les Pays-Bas, comme les autres pays de l?OCDE, sont confrontés à la difficulté de fournir, au meilleur coût, des services de santé et des soins de longue durée de haute qualité à une population vieillissante. Dans le secteur de la santé, des réformes ont déjà été mises en oeuvre en vue d?intensifier la concurrence. Malgré des changements majeurs et certains effets positifs, les réformes risquent de s?enliser, prises en étau entre un système centralisé d?offre et de prix contrôlés par l?État et un système décentralisé fondé sur une concurrence réglementée, n?incitant pas suffisamment à fournir des services de qualité et à maîtriser les dépenses. Les principales difficultés consistent à mener à bien la transition vers un régime de concurrence réglementée dans la prestation de soins de santé, à renforcer le rôle des assureurs en tant qu'agents acheteurs et à assurer la maîtrise des coûts dans un secteur de la santé qui obéit de plus en plus à la demande. En 2012, les réformes ont accru le rôle du marché dans le secteur hospitalier et renforcé les contrôles budgétaires. Ces deux mesures ne sont pas compatibles et risquent de compromettre la réalisation des deux objectifs. Des marchés plus concurrentiels requièrent, au minimum, une information de bonne qualité, un financement approprié et des incitations plus fortes à l?efficience. Compte tenu du vieillissement de la population, les politiques actuelles feront plus que doubler le coût des soins de longue durée au cours des décennies à venir. Il faudrait inciter davantage à l?achat de soins de longue durée efficaces par rapport à leur coût. Cependant, le plan du gouvernement consistant à transférer l?achat de soins de longue durée aux assureurs est voué à l?échec en l?absence de mesures supplémentaires faisant supporter à ces derniers les risques financiers correspondants. Il faudrait en outre encourager les soins à domicile aux dépens des soins en établissement, tout en améliorant le filtrage et la fixation d?objectifs. Ce document de travail se rapporte à l?Étude économique des Pays-Bas de 2012 (www.oecd.org/eco/etudes/Pays-Bas).

Suggested Citation

  • Erik Schut & Stéphane Sorbe & Jens Høj, 2013. "Health Care Reform and Long-Term Care in the Netherlands," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1010, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:1010-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k4dlw04vx0n-en
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Siciliani, Luigi & Moran, Valerie & Borowitz, Michael, 2014. "Measuring and comparing health care waiting times in OECD countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(3), pages 292-303.
    2. Stéphanie A. Geest & Marco Varkevisser, 2016. "Using the deductible for patient channeling: did preferred providers gain patient volume?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 17(5), pages 645-652, June.
    3. Boone, Jan & Douven, Rudy, 2014. "Provider competition and over-utilization in health care," CEPR Discussion Papers 10177, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. repec:ddj:fseeai:y:2017:i:3:p:33-46 is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Keywords

    assurance santé; concurrence réglementée; health care reforms; health insurance; hospitals; hôpitaux; long-term care; Netherlands; Pays-Bas; regulated competition; réforme des systèmes de santé; soins de longue durée;

    JEL classification:

    • H51 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Health
    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • I13 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Insurance, Public and Private
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:ecoaaa:1010-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/edoecfr.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.