IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/dafaad/29-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Trends in Large Pension Fund Investment in Infrastructure

Author

Listed:
  • Raffaele Della Croce

    (OECD)

Abstract

Favourable conditions such as the growth of pension fund assets, privatisation trends and changing regulations have increased the interest of institutional investors in infrastructure investment. However, data on pension fund investment in infrastructure is limited. National statistical agencies do not currently collect separate data on these investments, and the different modes available to investors to gain exposure to infrastructure means that information is buried under different headings. This paper is based on a recent survey of some of the largest pension funds across different regions, accounting for over USD 7 trillion of assets under management. We look at how much these investors have allocated to infrastructure, what is considered as infrastructure, where it fits in the total portfolio allocation, what approaches and forms of investment have been taken, what are recent trends in relation to infrastructure and asset allocation, regulation and green investment. A better understanding of these issues is necessary from a policy perspective in order to be able to attract institutional investors to the infrastructure sector. Tendances dans les investissements des grands fonds de pension dans les infrasctructures Des conditions propices, comme la croissance de l’actif des fonds de pension, l’orientation des privatisations et l’évolution de la réglementation, ont attisé l’intérêt des investisseurs institutionnels en faveur des investissements dans les infrastructures. Pour le moment, les données disponibles à ce sujet sont toutefois limitées. Les instituts de la statistique des différents pays ne compilent pas, pour l’heure, de données distinctes sur cette catégorie d’investissements, ces informations étant ventilées et dissimulées sous différents intitulés en raison de la diversité des vecteurs par lesquels les investisseurs peuvent se doter d’une telle exposition. Le présent rapport se fonde sur une enquête récente consacrée à certains des plus grands fonds de pension des différentes régions du monde, dont l’actif total sous gestion s’élève à plus de 7 000 milliards USD. Y sont analysés : la part allouée aux infrastructures par les investisseurs ; ce qui est considéré comme une infrastructure, la place de ces investissements dans les allocations globales de portefeuille, les approches retenues pour les réaliser et les formes qu’ils prennent, les récentes tendances dans le domaine des infrastructures et en matière d’allocation d’actifs, la réglementation et les investissements verts. Du point de vue des pouvoirs publics, il est indispensable d’acquérir une meilleure compréhension de ces questions pour pouvoir attirer les investisseurs institutionnels vers ce secteur.

Suggested Citation

  • Raffaele Della Croce, 2012. "Trends in Large Pension Fund Investment in Infrastructure," OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions 29, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:dafaad:29-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k8xd1p1p7r3-en
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pablo Antolín & Debbie Harrison, 2012. "Annual DC Pension Statements and the Communications Challenge," OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions 19, OECD Publishing.
    2. Berstein, Solange & Fuentes, Olga & Villatoro, Félix, 2013. "Default investment strategies in a defined contribution pension system: a pension risk model application for the chilean case," Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(04), pages 379-414, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Senderski, Marcin, 2014. "Assessing the strictness of portfolio-related regulation of pension funds: Rethinking the definition of prudent," MPRA Paper 56610, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Leviäkangas, Pekka & Ojala, Lauri & Töyli, Juuso, 2016. "An integrated ecosystem model for understanding infrastructure PPPs," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 10-19.
    3. Blyth, William & McCarthy, Rory & Gross, Robert, 2015. "Financing the UK power sector: Is the money available?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 607-622.
    4. Ben Ammar, Semir & Eling, Martin, 2015. "Common risk factors of infrastructure investments," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 257-273.
    5. Sophia Chong & Emily Poole, 2013. "Financing Infrastructure: A Spectrum of Country Approaches," RBA Bulletin, Reserve Bank of Australia, pages 65-76, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    actifs alternatifs; allocation d'actifs; alternative assets; asset allocation; barriers; contraintes réglementaires; diversification; diversification; financement privé; infrastructure; infrastructure; listed securities; obstacle; pensions; pensions; private finance; regulatory constraints; rendement; returns; risk; risque; titres cotés en bourse;

    JEL classification:

    • G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • J26 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Retirement; Retirement Policies

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:dafaad:29-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/caoecfr.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.