IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nse/doctra/g2012-03.html

Do Consumers Correctly Expect Price Reductions? Testing Dynamic Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • P. FÉVRIER

    (Crest)

  • L. WILNER

    (Insee)

Abstract

The literature on both theoretical and empirical dynamics requires agents to solve complex dynamic programs, which assumes implicitly that agents are fully rational and have the most accurate expectations given their information set. We claim that this assumption is easily testable provided that market-level data on prices and purchases are available. Using data on albums exhibiting frequent episodes of promotions, we perform a test derived from the predictions of a simple demand model and find that consumers hold simple expectations on the timing of promotions: everything happens as if consumers were expecting a Markov price process. Our results are consistent with the idea that the rationality of consumers is bounded because of limited memory or limited capacity. These results have important implications in terms of demand estimation, firms' optimal pricing strategy and computation of the welfare.

Suggested Citation

  • P. Février & L. Wilner, 2012. "Do Consumers Correctly Expect Price Reductions? Testing Dynamic Behavior," Documents de Travail de l'Insee - INSEE Working Papers g2012-03, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques.
  • Handle: RePEc:nse:doctra:g2012-03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bnsp.insee.fr/ark:/12148/bc6p06zr4pp/f1.pdf
    File Function: Document de travail de la DESE numéro G2012-03
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Khouja, Moutaz & Liu, Xin, 2021. "A price adjustment policy for maximizing revenue and countering strategic consumer behavior," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    3. Takeshi Fukasawa, 2025. "When do firms sell high durability products? The case of light bulb industry," Papers 2503.23792, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    4. Pires, Tiago, 2018. "Measuring the effects of search costs on equilibrium prices and profits," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 179-205.
    5. Wu, Xiang & Xiong, Jie & Li, Haitao & Wu, Han, 2019. "The myth of retail pricing policy for developing organic vegetable markets," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 8-13.
    6. Masakazu Ishihara & Andrew T. Ching, 2019. "Dynamic Demand for New and Used Durable Goods Without Physical Depreciation: The Case of Japanese Video Games," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(3), pages 392-416, May.
    7. Francesc Dilmé & Daniel Garrett, 2022. "A Dynamic Theory of Random Price Discounts," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 191, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    8. Hao Lan & Tim Lloyd & Wyn Morgan & Paul W. Dobson, 2022. "Are food price promotions predictable? The hazard function of supermarket discounts," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 64-85, February.
    9. Khouja, Moutaz & Ajjan, Haya & Liu, Xin, 2019. "The effect of return and price adjustment policies on a retailer’s performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(2), pages 466-482.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D11 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Theory
    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • D22 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis
    • D84 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Expectations; Speculations

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nse:doctra:g2012-03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: INSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inseefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.