The Impact of Provider Choice on Workers' Compensation Costs and Outcomes
We study how provider choice in workers' compensation cases affects costs and outcomes. When employees choose the provider, costs are higher and return-to-work outcomes are worse, while physical recovery is the same although satisfaction with medical care is higher. The higher costs and worse return-to-work outcomes associated with employee choice arise largely when employees selected a new provider, rather than a provider with whom the worker had a pre-existing relationship. The findings lend some support to recent policy changes limiting workers' ability to choose a provider with whom they do not have a prior relationship.
|Date of creation:||Dec 2005|
|Date of revision:|
|Publication status:||published as David Neumark & Peter S. Barth & Richard A. Victor, 2007. "The Impact of Provider Choice on Workers' Compensation Costs and Outcomes," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 61(1), pages 121-142, October.|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.nber.org
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Silvana Pozzebon, 1994. "Medical cost containment under workers' compensation," Industrial and Labor Relations Review, ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 48(1), pages 153-167, October.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:11855. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.