IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mtu/wpaper/23_09.html

Working for fun? The impact of employment in the arts sector on wellbeing

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Benison

    (Motu Economic and Public Policy Research)

  • Trinh Le

    (Motu Economic and Public Policy Research)

  • Arthur Grimes

    (Motu Economic and Public Policy Research)

Abstract

Despite the prospect of adverse financial and employment outcomes, the labour market for arts workers is often characterised with an excess supply of workers. Several theories have been proposed to explain this puzzle. In recent years one theory that has gained prominence is that employment in the arts provides workers with high wellbeing, which may compensate them for the low pay they receive. Using New Zealand Census and household survey data, this study finds that on average arts workers earn about 20% less than non-arts workers, however about half to two thirds of this pay gap can be explained by differences in observed characteristics between the two groups. While causality is not formally proved, we provide indirect evidence that employment in the arts sector has a positive impact on wellbeing. This additional wellbeing may be considered psychic income, which could be one reason why some people stay in the arts labour market despite the prospect of lower pay.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Benison & Trinh Le & Arthur Grimes, 2023. "Working for fun? The impact of employment in the arts sector on wellbeing," Motu Working Papers 23_09, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:mtu:wpaper:23_09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://motu-www.motu.org.nz/wpapers/23_09.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. El-Khattabi, Ahmed Rachid & Eskaf, Shadi & Isnard, Julien P. & Lin, Laurence & McManus, Brian & Yates, Andrew J., 2021. "Heterogeneous responses to price: Evidence from residential water consumers," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    2. Steven Hendrik Andreas Koop & Sharon Helena Pascale Clevers & Elisabeth Johanna Maria Blokker & Stijn Brouwer, 2021. "Public Attitudes towards Digital Water Meters for Households," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Hoffmann, Mark & Worthington, Andrew & Higgs, Helen, 2006. "Urban water demand with fixed volumetric charging in a large municipality: the case of Brisbane, Australia," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(3), pages 1-13, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Benison & Julia Talbot-Jones, 2023. "Urban water security: Assessing the impacts of metering and pricing in Aotearoa New Zealand," Motu Working Papers 23_11, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    2. Maria Carmela Aprile & Damiano Fiorillo, 2016. "Water Conservation Behavior and Environmental Concerns," Discussion Papers 6_2016, CRISEI, University of Naples "Parthenope", Italy.
    3. Xiaojia Bao, 2016. "Water, Electricity and Weather Variability in Rural Northern China," Working Papers 2014-07-02, Wang Yanan Institute for Studies in Economics (WISE), Xiamen University.
    4. Li, Xuxia & Wang, Huimin & Liu, Gang & Yang, Liu & Fang, Zhou & Xiao, Yi & Lai, Xiaoying & Gao, Li & Teng, Ying, 2025. "An “initial-engineering-end use” quasi-market pricing mechanism under cascading risk for cross-regional water rights trading," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    5. Productivity Commission, 2008. "Towards Urban Water Reform: A Discussion Paper," Research Papers 0801, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia.
    6. Aina, Ifedotun Victor & Thiam, Djiby Racine & Dinar, Ariel, 2023. "Substitution of piped water and self-supplied groundwater: The case of residential water in South Africa," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    7. repec:ags:aaea22:335571 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Wichman, Casey, 2024. "Efficiency, Equity, and Cost-Recovery Trade-Offs in Municipal Water Pricing," RFF Working Paper Series 24-18, Resources for the Future.
    9. Wietelman, Derek & Wichman, Casey & Brent, Daniel A., 2025. "Conservation and Distributional Consequences of Pricing Scarce Water During Droughts," RFF Working Paper Series 25-07, Resources for the Future.
    10. repec:bla:ausecr:v:41:y:2008:i:4:p:401-412 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Bethany Cooper & Michael Burton & Lin Crase, 2019. "Willingness to Pay to Avoid Water Restrictions in Australia Under a Changing Climate," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 72(3), pages 823-847, March.
    12. Atefeh Dadvar & Krushna Mahapatra & Jörgen Forss, 2021. "Water Use Behavior in a Multicultural Urban Area in Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-15, August.
    13. Fogarty, James & Polyakov, Maksym & Iftekhar, MD Sayed, "undated". "Equitable and Efficient systems of water utility charges in the face of a changing water supply mix," Working Papers 264780, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    14. Emma Aisbett & Ralf Steinhauser, 2011. "Maintaining the Common Pool: Voluntary Water Conservation in Response to Increasing Scarcity," ANU Working Papers in Economics and Econometrics 2011-554, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics.
    15. Maria A. García‐Valiñas & Roberto Martínez‐Espiñeira & Francisco González‐Gómez, 2010. "Economics of Water Reform in the Murray-Darling Basin," Centre for Water Economics, Environment and Policy Papers 1005, Centre for Water Economics, Environment and Policy, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    16. Leslie Danquah & Esi Awuah & Seth Agyemang & Charlotte Mensah, 2015. "Investigating the Predictors of Domestic Water Consumption in Urban Households with Children Under-Five Years: A Panel Study in the Atwima Nwabiagya District, Ghana," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(8), pages 1-1, August.
    17. Bethany Cooper & Michael Burton & Lin Crase, 2023. "Exploring customer heterogeneity with a scale‐extended latent class choice model: Experimental evidence drawn from urban water users," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 67(2), pages 176-197, April.
    18. Hughes, Neal & Hafi, Ahmed & Goesch, Tim, 2009. "Urban water management: optimal price and investment policy under climate variability," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 53(2), pages 1-18.
    19. Lin Crase & Suzanne O’Keefe & Brian Dollery, 2008. "Can Urban Water Markets Work? Some Concerns," Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, Australian National University, College of Business and Economics, School of Economics, vol. 15(3), pages 73-82.
    20. Emma Aisbett & Ralf Steinhauser, 2014. "Maintaining the Common Pool: Voluntary Water Conservation in Response to Varying Scarcity," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 59(2), pages 167-185, October.
    21. Alexander Maas & Roshan Puri & Christopher Goemans, 2024. "A review of residential water conservation policies and attempts to measure their effectiveness," PLOS Water, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(8), pages 1-13, August.
    22. Li, Li & Jeuland, Marc, 2023. "Household water savings and response to dynamic incentives under nonlinear pricing," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J31 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Wage Level and Structure; Wage Differentials
    • Z11 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economics of the Arts and Literature
    • I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mtu:wpaper:23_09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emma Williams (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/motuenz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.