Public Support for European Integration: A comparative analysis
This paper proposes to study how socio-economic characteristics shape preferences in European matters. It is assumed that social groups threatened by liberalization tend to be more euro-skeptical than others. This hypothesis is tested using individual-level data from two rounds of the European Social Survey. Controlling for national fixed effects and income, we focus on variables of occupational status (International Standard Classification of Occupations ISCO-88, and current occupation). Finally, we include a variable of subjective partisan affiliation to make sure that our results are not concealing a left/right positioning. We argue that the economic status of agents plays a crucial role in explaining cross-sectional variations in public support for the European process in each member state. Additionally, the partisan affiliation confirms that in European matters, socio-economic forces are not a mere reflection of the left/right spectrum.
|Date of creation:||Dec 2012|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: + 33 44 07 81 00
Fax: + 33 1 44 07 83 01
Web page: http://centredeconomiesorbonne.univ-paris1.fr/
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- repec:hal:journl:hal-00185083 is not listed on IDEAS
- Elvire Guillaud, 2011.
"Preferences for redistribution : an empirical analysis,"
Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers)
- Elvire Guillaud, 2011. "Preferences for redistribution: an empirical analysis," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 11030, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
- Rodrik, Dani, 1995. "Political economy of trade policy," Handbook of International Economics, in: G. M. Grossman & K. Rogoff (ed.), Handbook of International Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 28, pages 1457-1494 Elsevier.
- Anna Maria Mayda (Georgetown University) and Dani Rodrik (Harvard University), 2005.
"Why are some people (and countries) more protectionist than others?,"
gueconwpa~05-05-11, Georgetown University, Department of Economics.
- Mayda, Anna Maria & Rodrik, Dani, 2005. "Why are some people (and countries) more protectionist than others?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(6), pages 1393-1430, August.
- Anna Maria Mayda & Dani Rodrik, 2001. "Why Are Some People (and Countries) More Protectionist Than Others?," NBER Working Papers 8461, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Mayda, Anna Maria & Rodrik, Dani, 2001. "Why are Some People (and Countries) More Protectionist than Others?," CEPR Discussion Papers 2960, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Demmou, Lilas & Amable, Bruno & Ledezma, Ivan, 2009. "The Lisbon Strategy and Structural Reforms in Europe," Economics Papers from University Paris Dauphine 123456789/6926, Paris Dauphine University.
- Bruno Amable, 2007.
"La fin du modèle européen ?,"
Revue d'économie politique,
Dalloz, vol. 117(4), pages 551-575.
- Bruno Amable, 2007. "La fin du modèle européen ?," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-00185083, HAL.
- Elvire Guillaud & Stefano Palombarini, 2006. "Evolution des attentes sociales et comportement électoral : France, 1978-2002," PSE Working Papers halshs-00590295, HAL.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mse:cesdoc:12088. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Lucie Label)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.