Tests of market power in Irish Manufacturing Industries
It’s been a long-standing assumption that Irish manufacturing firms are price takers in their output markets. This assumption has been validated by several aggregate level studies. While a much smaller number of studies have examined this issue at a more disaggregated level, they tend to support this conclusion. All of these studies also assume that firms are price takers in their input markets, or, in other words inputs are perfectly elastically supplied to firms. This assumption, however, has never been formally tested. There is intrinsic interest in the context of competition law in ascertaining evidence of deviations from perfect competition in sales of product and purchases of inputs. Moreover the introduction of minimum wages provides an important additional motivation for the topic of this paper, since it is well known that the introduction of minimum wages or increases in the level of minimum wages can lead to increases in employment over a certain range of wages if the firm possesses market power in its labour market. By using four-digit level Census of Industrial Production (CIP) panel data the paper sets out to test the extent of potential market power in Irish manufacturing industries. The paper employs the ingenious method proposed by Hall and later modified by Roeger in this exercise. While the Hall-Roeger method was originally concerned with imperfect competition in output markets, it can be readily extended to input markets. The empirical results do not indicate much evidence of significant imperfect competition in output markets but the results do point to evidence of market power in certain input markets and in some industrial sectors. The implications of these findings are discussed.
|Date of creation:||2003|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.maynoothuniversity.ie/economics-finance-and-accounting
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Roeger, Werner, 1995. "Can Imperfect Competition Explain the Difference between Primal and Dual Productivity Measures? Estimates for U.S. Manufacturing," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 103(2), pages 316-30, April.
- Patrick Massey, 2000. "Market Definition and Market Power in Competition Analysis - Some Practical Issues," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 31(4), pages 309-328.
- Raper, Kellie Curry & Love, H. Alan & Shumway, C. Richard, 1998. "Distinguishing The Source Of Market Power: An Application To Cigarette Manufacturing," Faculty Paper Series 24021, Texas A&M University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
- Robert E. Hall, 1986.
"The Relation Between Price and Marginal Cost in U.S. Industry,"
NBER Working Papers
1785, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Hall, Robert E, 1988. "The Relation between Price and Marginal Cost in U.S. Industry," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 96(5), pages 921-47, October.
- Schroeter, John R, 1988.
"Estimating the Degree of Market Power in the Beef Packing Industry,"
The Review of Economics and Statistics,
MIT Press, vol. 70(1), pages 158-62, February.
- Schroeter, John R., 1988. "Estimating the Degree of Market Power in the Beef Packing Industry," Staff General Research Papers 11114, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:may:mayecw:n1210503.pdf. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.