IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Tests of market power in Irish Manufacturing Industries


  • Gerry Boyle

    () (NUI Maynooth)


It’s been a long-standing assumption that Irish manufacturing firms are price takers in their output markets. This assumption has been validated by several aggregate level studies. While a much smaller number of studies have examined this issue at a more disaggregated level, they tend to support this conclusion. All of these studies also assume that firms are price takers in their input markets, or, in other words inputs are perfectly elastically supplied to firms. This assumption, however, has never been formally tested. There is intrinsic interest in the context of competition law in ascertaining evidence of deviations from perfect competition in sales of product and purchases of inputs. Moreover the introduction of minimum wages provides an important additional motivation for the topic of this paper, since it is well known that the introduction of minimum wages or increases in the level of minimum wages can lead to increases in employment over a certain range of wages if the firm possesses market power in its labour market. By using four-digit level Census of Industrial Production (CIP) panel data the paper sets out to test the extent of potential market power in Irish manufacturing industries. The paper employs the ingenious method proposed by Hall and later modified by Roeger in this exercise. While the Hall-Roeger method was originally concerned with imperfect competition in output markets, it can be readily extended to input markets. The empirical results do not indicate much evidence of significant imperfect competition in output markets but the results do point to evidence of market power in certain input markets and in some industrial sectors. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerry Boyle, 2003. "Tests of market power in Irish Manufacturing Industries," Economics, Finance and Accounting Department Working Paper Series n1210503.pdf, Department of Economics, Finance and Accounting, National University of Ireland - Maynooth.
  • Handle: RePEc:may:mayecw:n1210503.pdf

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Hall, Robert E, 1988. "The Relation between Price and Marginal Cost in U.S. Industry," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 96(5), pages 921-947, October.
    2. Schroeter, John R, 1988. "Estimating the Degree of Market Power in the Beef Packing Industry," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 70(1), pages 158-162, February.
    3. Roeger, Werner, 1995. "Can Imperfect Competition Explain the Difference between Primal and Dual Productivity Measures? Estimates for U.S. Manufacturing," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 103(2), pages 316-330, April.
    4. Raper, Kellie Curry & Love, H. Alan & Shumway, C. Richard, 1998. "Distinguishing The Source Of Market Power: An Application To Cigarette Manufacturing," Faculty Paper Series 24021, Texas A&M University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    5. Patrick Massey, 2000. "Market Definition and Market Power in Competition Analysis - Some Practical Issues," The Economic and Social Review, Economic and Social Studies, vol. 31(4), pages 309-328.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    market power; imperfect competition; minimum wages; anti-trust legislation; econometric tests.;

    JEL classification:

    • D21 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Theory
    • D43 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection
    • J42 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Particular Labor Markets - - - Monopsony; Segmented Labor Markets
    • L4 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies
    • L60 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - General


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:may:mayecw:n1210503.pdf. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.