IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mag/wpaper/22004.html

On the design of a flow line with intermediate buffers and mixed corrective maintenance

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Zimmermann

Abstract

We considered a mixed corrective maintenance policy for machines in a two-machine one-buffer flow line. The machines had stochastic processing times and suffered from unexpected failures. In the case of a failure, the machines were either minimally repaired or their failing components were replaced by spare parts. While the replacement strategy is rapid and the system can be considered new thereafter, spare parts provisioning and storage costs are very high. Thus, we additionally considered minimal repairs, which are less expensive and restore the system to a working condition at a minimum. We modeled the system as a continuous-time Markov chain. This approach was used to measure the performance of the flow line and the mixed corrective maintenance policy employed. To facilitate design decisions for the flow line, we considered both the cost of an interstage buffer and the maintenance costs for machines in line. We formulated an optimization problem based on a profit function that enables the simultaneous optimization of the buffer size and maintenance strategy. Our numerical analyses reveal useful insights into the performance and optimal design of the flow line depending on the utilized maintenance strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Zimmermann, 2022. "On the design of a flow line with intermediate buffers and mixed corrective maintenance," FEMM Working Papers 22004, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Economics and Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:mag:wpaper:22004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.fww.ovgu.de/fww_media/femm/femm_2022/2022_04.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2011
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George J. Feeney & Craig C. Sherbrooke, 1966. "Correction to "(s - 1, s) Inventory Policy Under Compound Poisson Demand"," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(11), pages 908-908, July.
    2. Becker, Tristan & Lier, Stefan & Werners, Brigitte, 2019. "Value of modular production concepts in future chemical industry production networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(3), pages 957-970.
    3. Meller, Russell D. & Kim, David S., 1996. "The impact of preventive maintenance on system cost and buffer size," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 577-591, December.
    4. Karamatsoukis, C.C. & Kyriakidis, E.G., 2010. "Optimal maintenance of two stochastically deteriorating machines with an intermediate buffer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 297-308, November.
    5. Yifan Zhou & Chao Yuan & Tian Ran Lin & Lin Ma, 2021. "Maintenance policy structure investigation and optimisation of a complex production system with intermediate buffers," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(3), pages 458-473, June.
    6. Sophie Weiss & Justus Arne Schwarz & Raik Stolletz, 2019. "The buffer allocation problem in production lines: Formulations, solution methods, and instances," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(5), pages 456-485, May.
    7. Wang, Hongzhou, 2002. "A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 469-489, June.
    8. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    9. Carliss Y. Baldwin & Kim B. Clark, 2000. "Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262024667, December.
    10. Clément Chatras & Vincent Giard, 2016. "Simultaneous standardisation of modules and their components: a global economic perspective," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(19), pages 5722-5741, October.
    11. G. J. Feeney & C. C. Sherbrooke, 1966. "The (S - 1, S) Inventory Policy Under Compound Poisson Demand," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(5), pages 391-411, January.
    12. Nabil Nahas, 2017. "Buffer allocation and preventive maintenance optimization in unreliable production lines," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 85-93, January.
    13. Fitouhi, Mohamed-Chahir & Nourelfath, Mustapha & Gershwin, Stanley B., 2017. "Performance evaluation of a two-machine line with a finite buffer and condition-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 61-72.
    14. Yunyi Kang & Feng Ju, 2019. "Flexible preventative maintenance for serial production lines with multi-stage degrading machines and finite buffers," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(7), pages 777-791, July.
    15. Shuyuan Gan & Bolun Wang & Zhifang Song, 2021. "A Combined Maintenance Strategy Considering Spares, Buffer, and Quality," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(3), pages 431-445, June.
    16. Gudrun P. Kiesmüller & Julia Zimmermann, 2018. "The influence of spare parts provisioning on buffer size in a production system," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(5), pages 367-380, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei, Shuaichong & Nourelfath, Mustapha & Nahas, Nabil, 2023. "Analysis of a production line subject to degradation and preventive maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    2. Kiesmüller, G.P. & Sachs, F.E., 2020. "Spare parts or buffer? How to design a transfer line with unreliable machines," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 121-134.
    3. Zhang, Ning & Qi, Faqun & Zhang, Chengjie & Zhou, Hongming, 2022. "Joint optimization of condition-based maintenance policy and buffer capacity for a two-unit series system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    4. Maria Chiara Magnanini & Tullio Tolio, 2020. "Switching- and hedging- point policy for preventive maintenance with degrading machines: application to a two-machine line," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 241-271, June.
    5. Sachs, F.E. & Helber, S. & Kiesmüller, G.P., 2022. "Evaluation of Unreliable Flow Lines with Limited Buffer Capacities and Spare Part Provisioning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 544-559.
    6. Ece Zeliha Demirci & Joachim Arts & Geert-Jan van Houtum, 2025. "A restless bandit approach for capacitated condition based maintenance scheduling," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 179-207, March.
    7. Fiona Sloothaak & Alp Akçay & Geert-Jan van Houtum & Matthieu van der Heijden, 2023. "After-Sales Services During an Asset’s Lifetime: Collaborative Planning of System Upgrades," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 212-232, September.
    8. Ki Ling Cheung, 1996. "On the (S‐1, S) inventory model under compound poisson demands and i.i.d. unit resupply times," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(4), pages 563-572, June.
    9. Dimitrakos, T.D. & Kyriakidis, E.G., 2008. "A semi-Markov decision algorithm for the maintenance of a production system with buffer capacity and continuous repair times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 752-762, February.
    10. Liu, Gehui & Chen, Shaokuan & Ho, Tinkin & Ran, Xinchen & Mao, Baohua & Lan, Zhen, 2022. "Optimum opportunistic maintenance schedule over variable horizons considering multi-stage degradation and dynamic strategy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    11. Kazaz, Burak & Sloan, Thomas W., 2013. "The impact of process deterioration on production and maintenance policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 88-100.
    12. Prak, Derk & Teunter, Rudolf & Babai, M. Z. & Syntetos, A. A. & Boylan, D, 2018. "Forecasting and Inventory Control with Compound Poisson Demand Using Periodic Demand Data," Research Report 2018010, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    13. Jyrki Savolainen & Michele Urbani, 2021. "Maintenance optimization for a multi-unit system with digital twin simulation," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(7), pages 1953-1973, October.
    14. Lengu, D. & Syntetos, A.A. & Babai, M.Z., 2014. "Spare parts management: Linking distributional assumptions to demand classification," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(3), pages 624-635.
    15. Toon Vanderschueren & Robert Boute & Tim Verdonck & Bart Baesens & Wouter Verbeke, 2022. "Prescriptive maintenance with causal machine learning," Papers 2206.01562, arXiv.org.
    16. Shuyuan Gan & Xinzhou Zhang & Lan Chen, 2022. "Maintenance optimization of a production system considering defect prevention and spare parts ordering," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(5), pages 893-906, October.
    17. Pinciroli, Luca & Baraldi, Piero & Zio, Enrico, 2023. "Maintenance optimization in industry 4.0," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    18. Tarakci, Hakan & Kulkarni, Shailesh & Ozdemir, Zafer D., 2018. "The impact of wearable devices and performance payments on health outcomes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 291-301.
    19. Jovan Grahovac & Amiya Chakravarty, 2001. "Sharing and Lateral Transshipment of Inventory in a Supply Chain with Expensive Low-Demand Items," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 579-594, April.
    20. Karsten, Frank & Basten, Rob J.I., 2014. "Pooling of spare parts between multiple users: How to share the benefits?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(1), pages 94-104.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mag:wpaper:22004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: IT Administrators at FWW (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwmagde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.