IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/lis/liswps/922.html

Social Protection Puzzle: Recipiency-based Benefit Complexity in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Heta Pöyliö

Abstract

Social protection systems are considered the cornerstones of the welfare state, originally built to address inequalities, alleviate poverty, and mitigate social risks. Many European social protection systems have evolved into complex, multi-tiered 'puzzles' as they expand coverage to address new life-course risks. This has created systems in which navigating is a skill and access is unequal. This paper uses a recipiency-based approach to analyse the level of benefit complexity of European social protection systems, 'the puzzle', by counting how many different types of social cash benefits households receive in one year. A higher number reflects greater complexity of the income protection system. Using microdata from the Luxembourg Income Study across 25 European countries for the years 2000-2023, the results show that households, particularly families, can receive up to 15 different benefits as part of their annual income, although there is significant variation across countries and households. Benefit complexity has increased in some countries, whereas it has been relatively stable in others. The increase in benefit complexity is associated with higher access to benefits in Southern Europe across all household types, whereas in the Nordic countries, the rise in single-parent benefit complexity aligns with growing single-parent poverty rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Heta Pöyliö, 2026. "Social Protection Puzzle: Recipiency-based Benefit Complexity in Europe," LIS Working papers 922, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
  • Handle: RePEc:lis:liswps:922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.lisdatacenter.org/wps/liswps/922.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lis:liswps:922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Piotr Paradowski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lisprlu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.