IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/kcs/wpaper/1.html

Heterogeneity, Networks and International Trade under Monopolistic Competition

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen HIEP
  • Hiroshi OHTA

Abstract

This paper examines integrated effects of firm heterogeneity and communication network services on international trade. Patterns and effects of trade are to be analyzed in a general equilibrium model where firms with different productivity levels share among them the cost of network services and compete in a monopolistically competitive market for a differentiated good. The paper reveals that the more efficient country in the differentiated good production is not always the net-exporter of the good. The less efficient country also has the chance to expand the industry and then to become the net-exporter in this intra-industry trade due to the combination of the efficiency effect induced by firm heterogeneity and the cost-sharing effect by the existence of the network service industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen HIEP & Hiroshi OHTA, 2005. "Heterogeneity, Networks and International Trade under Monopolistic Competition," GSICS Working Paper Series 1, Graduate School of International Cooperation Studies, Kobe University.
  • Handle: RePEc:kcs:wpaper:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://da.lib.kobe-u.ac.jp/da/kernel/80600001/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew B. Bernard & Stephen J. Redding & Peter K. Schott, 2007. "Comparative Advantage and Heterogeneous Firms," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 74(1), pages 31-66.
    2. Toru Kikuchi & Chiharu Kobayashi, 2003. "Communications networks and virtual economic integration: The case of three countries," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 9(1), pages 1-6, February.
    3. Yeaple, Stephen Ross, 2005. "A simple model of firm heterogeneity, international trade, and wages," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Fink, Carsten & Mattoo, Aaditya & Neagu, Ileana Cristina, 2005. "Assessing the impact of communication costs on international trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 428-445, December.
    5. Toru Kikuchi & Tetsuro Ichikawa, 2002. "Congestible communications networks and international trade," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(2), pages 331-340, May.
    6. Catia Montagna, 2001. "Efficiency Gaps, Love of Variety and International Trade," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 68(269), pages 27-44, February.
    7. Manasse, Paolo & Turrini, Alessandro, 2001. "Trade, wages, and 'superstars'," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 97-117, June.
    8. Toru Kikuchi, 2003. "Interconnectivity of communications networks and international trade," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(1), pages 155-167, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nguyen Hiep & Hiroshi Ohta, 2007. "Efficiency in International Trade with Firm Heterogeneity and Networks," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), pages 217-231, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jørgensen, Jan G. & Schröder, Philipp J.H., 2008. "Fixed export cost heterogeneity, trade and welfare," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(7), pages 1256-1274, October.
    2. Yanhui Wu, 2011. "Managerial Incentives and Compensation in a Global Market," CEP Discussion Papers dp1066, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    3. Crozet, Matthieu & Trionfetti, Federico, 2013. "Firm-level comparative advantage," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 321-328.
    4. Wu, Yanhui, 2011. "Managerial incentives and compensation in a global market," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121919, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Nicholas Sly, 2013. "International Trade And The Composition Of Labor Market Turnover," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 51(1), pages 122-137, January.
    6. Richard E. Baldwin & Rikard Forslid, 2010. "Trade Liberalization with Heterogeneous Firms," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 161-176, May.
    7. Teixeira, Aurora A.C. & Tavares-Lehmann, Ana Teresa, 2014. "Human capital intensity in technology-based firms located in Portugal: Does foreign ownership matter?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 737-748.
    8. Bang Nam Jeon & Linghui Tang, 2005. "Information Technology and Bilateral FDI: Theory and Evidence," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 20, pages 613-630.
    9. Ariel Burstein & Jonathan Vogel, 2011. "Factor Prices and International Trade: A Unifying Perspective," NBER Working Papers 16904, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Engelmann, Sabine, 2011. "Trade liberalisation, technical change and skill-specific unemployment," IAB-Discussion Paper 201119, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    11. Brueckner, Markus & Van Long, Ngo & Vespignani, Joaquin, 2020. "Non-gravity trade," Working Papers 2020-04, University of Tasmania, Tasmanian School of Business and Economics.
    12. Besedes, Tibor & Prusa, Thomas J., 2006. "Product differentiation and duration of US import trade," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 339-358, December.
    13. Yukiko Sawada, 2015. "The Effect of Technology Choice on Specialization and Welfare in a Two-Country Model," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 15-10, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics.
    14. Unjung Whang, 2016. "Skilled-Labor Intensity Differences Across Firms, Endogenous Product Quality, and Wage Inequality," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 251-292, April.
    15. Nguyen Hiep & Hiroshi Ohta, 2007. "Efficiency in International Trade with Firm Heterogeneity and Networks," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), pages 217-231, May.
    16. Andrew B. Bernard & J. Bradford Jensen & Stephen J. Redding & Peter K. Schott, 2012. "The Empirics of Firm Heterogeneity and International Trade," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 4(1), pages 283-313, July.
    17. Michael Koch, 2016. "Skills, Tasks and the Scarcity of Talent in a Global Economy," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(3), pages 536-563, August.
    18. yukiko sawada, 2014. "Agglomeration, Segmentation and Technology Choice," ERSA conference papers ersa14p1069, European Regional Science Association.
    19. Valeria Gattai, 2015. "Foreign exposure and heterogeneous performance of Italian firms: A survey of the empirical literature (1992-2014)," Working Papers 300, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised Apr 2015.
    20. Sly, Nicholas, 2010. "Skill Acquisition, Incentive Contracts and Jobs: Labor Market Adjustment to Trade," MPRA Paper 25004, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kcs:wpaper:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: GSICS Library (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ddkobjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.