IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/kbb/dpaper/2014-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Postal Services: Governments and Firms' Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Fumitoshi Mizutani

    (Graduate School of Business Administration, Kobe University)

  • Shuji Uranishi

    (Graduate School of Economics, Osaka City University)

  • Eri Nakamura

    (Graduate School of Business Administration, Kobe University)

Abstract

This paper has aimed to provide information useful to policy makers involved in planning for the management of postal service. Five countries were selected?the UK, France, Germany, US and Japan?and the characteristics of their postal services were described in terms of regulation, liberalization, governance, and strategies. Variations were noted in regulatory structures and liberalization policies. Governance structure and corporate strategies were deemed to be of increasing importance as postal service providers adopt a more corporate company style. The important points made in this paper are summarized as follows. First, variations have been observed in the liberalization of postal services among countries. Two important factors are ownership and competition. Provision by the private sector through privatization is more productive-efficiency-oriented, and it is necessary to introduce competition in situations where monopolistic organizations exist. The general trend in liberalization is toward privatization and competition, with the UK and Germany in the vanguard. Second, it is necessary to maintain the universal service obligation (USO), but procuring financial backing is problematic. Among various financing methods, the USO fund seems reasonable. Third, the governance structure of postal service provider varies from country to country, according to corporate law. As for company type, postal organizations are divided into three groups: the single corporation type (e.g. Deutsche Post DHL and La Poste), the holding company type (e.g. Royal mail and Japan Post), and the public corporation type (e.g. the USPS). Last, as for internationalization strategy, Deutsche Post DHL, La Poste and Royal Mail have taken steps to expand their operations internationally, while the USPS and Japan Post have been slower to make inroads abroad.

Suggested Citation

  • Fumitoshi Mizutani & Shuji Uranishi & Eri Nakamura, 2014. "Postal Services: Governments and Firms' Perspective," Discussion Papers 2014-38, Kobe University, Graduate School of Business Administration.
  • Handle: RePEc:kbb:dpaper:2014-38
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.b.kobe-u.ac.jp/papers_files/2014_38.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2014
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fumitoshi Mizutani, 2012. "Regulatory Reform of Public Utilities," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 12743.
    2. Fumitoshi Mizutani, 2014. "Looking Beyond Europe with a Special Focus on Japan," Discussion Papers 2014-24, Kobe University, Graduate School of Business Administration.
    3. Mizutani, Fumitoshi & Uranishi, Shuji, 2003. "The Post Office vs. Parcel Delivery Companies: Competition Effects on Costs and Productivity," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 299-319, May.
    4. Fumitoshi Mizutani & Shuji Uranishi, 2006. "Special Post Office, Privatization and Universal Service Obligation Costs," Discussion Papers 2006-05, Kobe University, Graduate School of Business Administration.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fumitoshi Mizutani & Eri Nakamura, 2017. "How do governance factors affect inefficiency? Stochastic frontier analysis of public utility firms in Japan," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 44(3), pages 267-289, September.
    2. Fumitoshi Mizutani, 2019. "Going Places: Rail Transport in Japan," Discussion Papers 2019-03, Kobe University, Graduate School of Business Administration.
    3. Ishida, Junichiro & Matsushima, Noriaki, 2009. "Should civil servants be restricted in wage bargaining? A mixed-duopoly approach," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(3-4), pages 634-646, April.
    4. Matthias Finger & Pierre Messulam (ed.), 2015. "Rail Economics, Policy and Regulation in Europe," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15711.
    5. Laurino, Antonio & Ramella, Francesco & Beria, Paolo, 2015. "The economic regulation of railway networks: A worldwide survey," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 202-212.
    6. Iturralde, Maria José & Quirós, Cipriano, 2008. "Analysis of efficiency of the European postal sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 84-90, July.
    7. Ding Chen & Leonard F. S. Wang & Ji Sun, 2023. "Does CSR influence privatization wave?," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(2), pages 1088-1097, March.
    8. Yoshio Kamijo & Yasuhiko Nakamura, 2009. "Stable market structures from merger activities in mixed oligopoly with asymmetric costs," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 98(1), pages 1-24, September.
    9. Goto, Mika & Makhija, Anil K., 2007. "The Impact of Competition and Corporate Structure on Productive Efficiency: The Case of the U.S. Electric Utility Industry, 1990-2004," Working Paper Series 2007-10, Ohio State University, Charles A. Dice Center for Research in Financial Economics.
    10. Massimo Filippini & Marika Zola, 2005. "Economies of scale and cost efficiency in the postal services: empirical evidence from Switzerland," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(7), pages 437-441.
    11. Junichi Haraguchi & Toshihiro Matsumura, 2021. "Profit‐enhancing entries in mixed oligopolies," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 88(1), pages 33-55, July.
    12. Yveline Lecler, 2017. "Small and Micro-Scale Hydropower in Japan," Post-Print halshs-01803429, HAL.
    13. Fumitoshi Mizutani & Eri Nakamura, 2013. "Regulation, Competition, Diversification, Governance and Costs: An Empirical Analysis of Public Utility and Manufacturing Firms in Japan," Discussion Papers 2013-25, Kobe University, Graduate School of Business Administration.
    14. Benassi, Corrado & Castellani, Massimiliano & Mussoni, Maurizio, 2016. "Price equilibrium and willingness to pay in a vertically differentiated mixed duopoly," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 86-96.
    15. Fumitoshi Mizutani & Eri Nakamura, 2014. "What Most Affects A Firm' s Costs: Internal or External Factors, or Both?," Discussion Papers 2014-22, Kobe University, Graduate School of Business Administration.
    16. Mizutani, Fumitoshi & Uranishi, Shuji, 2020. "An analysis of the inter-effect of structural reforms and rail mode share," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    17. Massimo Filippini & Martin Koller & Urs Trinkner, 2010. "Do opening hours and unobserved heterogeneity affect economies of scale and scope in postal outlets?," Quaderni della facoltà di Scienze economiche dell'Università di Lugano 1007, USI Università della Svizzera italiana.
    18. Song, Yeon-Jung & Shoji, Kenichi, 2016. "Effects of diversification strategies on investment in railway business: The case of private railway companies in Japan," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 388-396.
    19. Tochkov, Kiril, 2015. "The efficiency of postal services in the age of market liberalization and the internet: Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 35-42.
    20. Mark Armstrong & David E.M. Sappington, 2006. "Regulation, Competition and Liberalization," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 44(2), pages 325-366, June.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kbb:dpaper:2014-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yasuyuki Miyahara (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bskobjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.