IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/kan/wpaper/201902.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Two Stage 2 × 2 Games With Strategic Substitutes and Strategic Heterogeneity

Author

Listed:
  • Tarun Sabarwal

    (Department of Economics, University of Kansas)

  • Hoa VuXuan

    (Department of Economics, The University of Kansas)

Abstract

Feng and Sabarwal (2018) show that there is additional scope to study strategic complements in extensive form games, by investigating in detail the case of two stage, 2×2 games. We show the same for two stage, 2 × 2 games with strategic substitutes and with strategic heterogeneity. We characterize strategic substitutes and strategic heterogeneity in such games, and show that the set of each class of games has infinite Lebesgue measure. Our conditions are easy to apply and yield uncountably many examples of such games, indicating greater possibilities for the manifestation and study of these types of interactions. In contrast to the case for strategic complements, we show that generically, the set of subgame perfect Nash equilibria in both classes of games is totally unordered (no two equilibria are comparable). Consequently, with multiple equilibria, some nice features of strategic complements that depend on the complete lattice structure of the equilibrium set may not transfer to the case of strategic substitutes or strategic heterogeneity.

Suggested Citation

  • Tarun Sabarwal & Hoa VuXuan, 2018. "Two Stage 2 × 2 Games With Strategic Substitutes and Strategic Heterogeneity," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 201902, University of Kansas, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:kan:wpaper:201902
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www2.ku.edu/~kuwpaper/2019Papers/201902.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yue Feng & Tarun Sabarwal, 2018. "Strategic Complements in Two Stage, 2 × 2 Games," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 201801, University of Kansas, Department of Economics.
    2. Andrew J. Monaco & Tarun Sabarwal, 2016. "Games with strategic complements and substitutes," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 62(1), pages 65-91, June.
    3. Sunanda Roy & Tarun Sabarwal, 2008. "On the (non-)lattice structure of the equilibrium set in games with strategic substitutes," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 37(1), pages 161-169, October.
    4. Milgrom, Paul & Shannon, Chris, 1994. "Monotone Comparative Statics," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 62(1), pages 157-180, January.
    5. Feng, Yue & Sabarwal, Tarun, 2020. "Strategic complements in two stage, 2 × 2 games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    6. Echenique, Federico, 2004. "Extensive-form games and strategic complementarities," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 348-364, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feng, Yue & Sabarwal, Tarun, 2020. "Strategic complements in two stage, 2 × 2 games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    2. Nobuyuki Hanaki & Ali I. Ozkes, 2023. "Strategic environment effect and communication," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 26(3), pages 588-621, July.
    3. Yue Feng & Tarun Sabarwal, 2020. "Dynamic strategic complements in two stage, 2x2 games," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 202006, University of Kansas, Department of Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Uttiya Paul & Tarun Sabarwal, 2023. "Directional monotone comparative statics in function spaces," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 11(1), pages 153-169, April.
    2. repec:kan:wpaper:201412 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Finn Christensen, 2019. "Comparative statics and heterogeneity," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 67(3), pages 665-702, April.
    4. Anne-Christine Barthel & Eric Hoffmann, 2019. "Rationalizability and learning in games with strategic heterogeneity," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 67(3), pages 565-587, April.
    5. Anne-Christine Barthel & Tarun Sabarwal, 2018. "Directional monotone comparative statics," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 66(3), pages 557-591, October.
    6. Cao, Zhigang & Chen, Xujin & Qin, Cheng-Zhong & Wang, Changjun & Yang, Xiaoguang, 2018. "Embedding games with strategic complements into games with strategic substitutes," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 45-51.
    7. repec:kan:wpaper:201502 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Camacho, Carmen & Kamihigashi, Takashi & Sağlam, Çağrı, 2018. "Robust comparative statics for non-monotone shocks in large aggregative games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 288-299.
    9. Roy, Sunanda & Sabarwal, Tarun, 2012. "Characterizing stability properties in games with strategic substitutes," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 337-353.
    10. Anne-Christine Barthel & Eric Hoffmann, 2020. "Characterizing monotone games," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 70(4), pages 1045-1068, November.
    11. Magnus Hoffmann & Grégoire Rota‐Graziosi, 2020. "Endogenous timing in the presence of non‐monotonicities," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(1), pages 359-402, February.
    12. Anne-Christine Barthel & Eric Hoffmann & Tarun Sabarwal, 2021. "A Unified Approach to p-Dominance and its Generalizations in Games with Strategic Complements and Substitutes," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 202109, University of Kansas, Department of Economics.
    13. Balbus, Lukasz & Dziewulski, Pawel & Reffett, Kevin & Wozny, Lukasz, 2022. "Markov distributional equilibrium dynamics in games with complementarities and no aggregate risk," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 17(2), May.
    14. Shuoxun Zhang & Tarun Sabarwal & Li Gan, 2015. "Strategic Or Nonstrategic: The Role Of Financial Benefit In Bankruptcy," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 53(2), pages 1004-1018, April.
    15. Xavier Vives, 2009. "Strategic complementarity in multi-stage games," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 40(1), pages 151-171, July.
    16. Roy, Sunanda & Sabarwal, Tarun, 2010. "Monotone comparative statics for games with strategic substitutes," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 793-806, September.
    17. Amir, Rabah & De Castro, Luciano, 2017. "Nash equilibrium in games with quasi-monotonic best-responses," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 220-246.
    18. Barthel, Anne-Christine & Hoffmann, Eric & Sabarwal, Tarun, 2022. "Characterizing robust solutions in monotone games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 201-219.
    19. Yue Feng & Tarun Sabarwal, 2018. "Strategic Complements in Two Stage, 2 × 2 Games," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 201801, University of Kansas, Department of Economics.
    20. Yue Feng & Tarun Sabarwal, 2020. "Dynamic strategic complements in two stage, 2x2 games," WORKING PAPERS SERIES IN THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS 202006, University of Kansas, Department of Economics.
    21. Andrew J. Monaco & Tarun Sabarwal, 2016. "Games with strategic complements and substitutes," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 62(1), pages 65-91, June.
    22. Feng, Yue & Sabarwal, Tarun, 2020. "Strategic complements in two stage, 2 × 2 games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Strategic substitutes; strategic complements; strategic heterogeneity; two stage game; extensive form game;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C60 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - General
    • C70 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kan:wpaper:201902. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Professor Zongwu Cai (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deuksus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.