IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izadps/dp18215.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bridging Language Barriers: The Impact of Large Language Models on Academic Writing

Author

Listed:
  • Dalaman, Burak

    (University of London)

  • Kalay, Ali Furkan

    (Macquarie University, Sydney)

  • Kettlewell, Nathan

    (University of Technology, Sydney)

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have altered the nature of academic writing. While the influence of LLMs on academic writing is not uncontroversial, one promise for this technology is to bridge language barriers faced by nonnative English-speaking researchers. This study empirically demonstrates that LLMs have led to convergence in the lexical diversity of native and nonnative speakers, potentially helping to level the playing field. There has also been an increase in language complexity for nonnatives. We classify over one million authors as native or nonnative English speakers based on the etymological origins of their names and analyze over one million abstracts from arXiv.org, evaluating changes in lexical diversity and readability before and after ChatGPT’s release in November 2022. The results demonstrate a sharp increase in writing sophistication among all researchers, with nonnative English speakers showing the greatest gains across all writing metrics. Our findings provide empirical evidence on the impact of LLMs in academic writing, supporting recent speculations about their potential to bridge language barriers.

Suggested Citation

  • Dalaman, Burak & Kalay, Ali Furkan & Kettlewell, Nathan, 2025. "Bridging Language Barriers: The Impact of Large Language Models on Academic Writing," IZA Discussion Papers 18215, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
  • Handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp18215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://docs.iza.org/dp18215.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Van Noorden & Jeffrey M. Perkel, 2023. "AI and science: what 1,600 researchers think," Nature, Nature, vol. 621(7980), pages 672-675, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evangelos Katsamakas & Oleg V. Pavlov & Ryan Saklad, 2024. "Artificial intelligence and the transformation of higher education institutions," Papers 2402.08143, arXiv.org.
    2. Saima Javed & Yu Rong & Babar Nawaz Abbasi, 2024. "Convergence analysis of artificial intelligence research capacity: Are the less developed catching up with the developed ones?," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(4), pages 2172-2192, May.
    3. Ion-Danut LIXANDRU, 2024. "The Use of Artificial Intelligence for Qualitative Data Analysis: ChatGPT," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 28(1), pages 57-67.
    4. Shalpegin, Timofey & Browning, Tyson R. & Kumar, Ajay & Shang, Guangzhi & Thatcher, Jason & Fransoo, Jan C. & Holweg, Matthias & Lawson, Benn, 2025. "Generative AI and empirical research methods in operations management," Other publications TiSEM 0eb52ee8-35d0-4c97-8732-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Kayvan Kousha, 2024. "How is ChatGPT acknowledged in academic publications?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(12), pages 7959-7969, December.
    6. Nguyen Tat Hiep, 2025. "Ethical Challenges in the Era of Generative AI: Insights from a Practice-Informed Rapid Review," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(10), pages 8146-8162, October.
    7. Toni GIBEA & Radu USZKAI & Mihail Valentin CERNEA, 2023. "The Ethical Risks Posed By New Technologies In Research," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(1), pages 757-765, November.
    8. Amy Wenxuan Ding & Shibo Li, 2025. "Generative AI lacks the human creativity to achieve scientific discovery from scratch," Post-Print hal-05053017, HAL.
    9. Wadim Strielkowski, 2024. "Could AI change the scientific publishing market once and for all?," Papers 2401.14952, arXiv.org.
    10. Matthew Caron & Oliver Müller & Johannes Kriebel, 2025. "Detecting and Mitigating Shortcut Learning Bias in Machine Learning: A Pathway to More Generalizable ML-based (IS) Research," Working Papers Dissertations 129, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    11. Moon, Won-Ki & Kahlor, Lee Ann, 2025. "Fact-checking in the age of AI: Reducing biases with non-human information sources," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    12. Evangelos Katsamakas & Oleg V. Pavlov & Ryan Saklad, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Higher Education Institutions: A Systems Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-21, July.
    13. Andersen, Jens Peter & Degn, Lise & Fishberg, Rachel & Graversen, Ebbe K. & Horbach, Serge P.J.M. & Schmidt, Evanthia Kalpazidou & Schneider, Jesper W. & Sørensen, Mads P., 2025. "Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in the research process – A survey of researchers’ practices and perceptions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    14. repec:osf:osfxxx:h6a7c_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Julian Junyan Wang & Victor Xiaoqi Wang, 2024. "Leveraging Large Language Models to Democratize Access to Costly Datasets for Academic Research," Papers 2412.02065, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2025.
    16. Hermann, Erik & Puntoni, Stefano, 2024. "Artificial intelligence and consumer behavior: From predictive to generative AI," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    17. Daniel Leuthe & Tim Meyer-Hollatz & Tobias Plank & Anja Senkmüller, 2024. "Towards Sustainability of AI – Identifying Design Patterns for Sustainable Machine Learning Development," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 2103-2145, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iza:izadps:dp18215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Holger Hinte (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/izaaade.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.