IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/199502010800001262.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Supply, Land Quality, and Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Gallagher, Paul

Abstract

Recent reforms of the EC grain sector justify renewed interest in the supply ^alysis of producer policies that include a subsidy and a land reduction requirement. Some supply analysis accounts for simultaneous land control and producer payment (Houck and Ryan, Gallagher). However, econometric methods of supply analysis have limited usefulness when major policy changes occur (Weaver). Major changes have indeed occurred in Europe, 1. CAP reform, introducing producer subsidies, low ?? price and set-aside. 2, Transition from central planning. But land quality is an important dimension of producer's participation decisions (Brooks et al.). And the implications of producers with marginal land on market supply still require discussion. The potential for domestic supply distortions and price stability are relevant if trade agreements include such policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Gallagher, Paul, 1995. "Supply, Land Quality, and Policy," ISU General Staff Papers 199502010800001262, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:199502010800001262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/89995b2b-009d-4e5f-bd75-2c030540b224/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. P. Houck & M. E. Ryan, 1972. "Supply Analysis for Corn in the United States: The Impact of Changing Government Programs," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 54(2), pages 184-191.
    2. Houck, James P. & Ryan, Mary E., 1972. "Supply Analysis For Corn In The United States: The Impact Of Changing Government Programs," Staff Papers 13554, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    3. Bureau, Jean Christophe & Butault, Jean-Pierre & Hoque, Anwarul, 1992. "International Comparisons of Costs of Wheat Production in the EC and United States," Staff Reports 278676, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Brooks, H. G. & Aradhyula, Satheesh V. & Johnson, Stanley R., 1992. "Land Quality and Producer Participation in U.S. Commodity Programs," Staff General Research Papers Archive 470, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    5. H.G. Brooks & Satheesh V. Aradhyula & S.R. Johnson, 1992. "Land Quality and Producer Participation in U.S. Commodity Programs," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 14(1), pages 105-115.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grant, Warren R. & Beach, John & Lin, William, 1984. "Factors Affecting Supply, Demand, And Prices Of U.S. Rice," Staff Reports 277629, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Chembezi, Duncan M. & Womack, Abner W., 1992. "Regional Acreage Response For U.S. Corn And Wheat: The Effects Of Government Programs," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(1), pages 1-12, July.
    3. Bailey, Kenneth W. & Womack, Abner W., 1985. "Wheat Acreage Response: A Regional Econometric Investigation," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(2), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Haile, M.G. & Kalkuhl, M., 2014. "Volatility in the international food markets: implications for global agricultural supply and for market and price policy," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 49, March.
    5. Kanlaya J. Barr & Bruce A. Babcock & Miguel A. Carriquiry & Andre M. Nassar & Leila Harfuch, 2011. "Agricultural Land Elasticities in the United States and Brazil," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 33(3), pages 449-462.
    6. Just, Richard E., 1992. "Discovering Microeconomic Relationships in Agriculture," 1992 Conference (36th), February 10-13, 1992, Canberra, Australia 146530, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    7. Umanath Malaiarasan & R. Paramasivam & K. Thomas Felix & S. J. Balaji, 2020. "Simultaneous equation model for Indian sugar sector," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 22(1), pages 113-141, June.
    8. Evans, R. Samuel & Kenyon, David E., 1974. "Regional Soybean Acreage Response Analysis and Projections for 1974," Miscellaneous Publications 327162, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. Soule, Meredith J. & Nimon, R. Wesley & Mullarkey, Daniel J., 2001. "Risk Management And The Environment: Impacts At The Intensive And Extensive Margins," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20670, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    10. Holt, Matthew T., 1989. "Risk, Rational Expectations, and Price Stabilization in the U.S. Corn Market," Staff Papers 200480, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    11. Wu, JunJie & Adams, Richard M., 2002. "Micro Versus Macro Acreage Response Models: Does Site-Specific Information Matter?," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(1), pages 1-21, July.
    12. Rausser, Gordon C. & Lichtenberg, Erik & Lattimore, Ralph, 1981. "Developments in theory and empirical applications of endogenous governmental behavior," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt34j553k1, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    13. Khanna, Madhu & Isik, Murat & Zilberman, David, 2002. "Cost-effectiveness of alternative green payment policies for conservation technology adoption with heterogeneous land quality," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 157-174, August.
    14. Danin, Yigal, 1976. "A Simple Analysis Of Acreage Response To Some Agricultural Programs," Staff Papers 13889, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    15. Weaver, Robert D. & Krainik, Amy, 1979. "Policy Control of Corn Acreage: A Re-examination," Staff Paper Series 256837, Pennsylvania State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    16. Ornelas, Fermin S. & Shumway, C. Richard, 1993. "Multidimensional Evaluation Of Flexible Functional Forms For Production Analysis," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 25(2), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Lin, Chien-Pang & Barkley, Andrew P., 1997. "Declining Commodity Program Payments and Enhanced Environmental Regulations: Impacts on Acreage Allocation in the Great Plains," 1997 Annual Meeting, July 13-16, 1997, Reno\ Sparks, Nevada 35932, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    18. Norton, Nancy Anders, 1986. "The Effect Of Acreage Reduction Programs On The Production Of Corn, Wheat, And Cotton: A Profit Function Approach," 1986 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Reno, Nevada 278421, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. Yinhao Wu & Enru Wang & Changhong Miao, 2019. "Fertilizer Use in China: The Role of Agricultural Support Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-23, August.
    20. Kramer, Randall A. & Pope, Rulon D., 1980. "The Benefits And Costs Of Participation In Farm Commodity Programs: A Stochastic Dominance Analysis," Working Papers 225685, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:199502010800001262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.