Some Even More Unpleasant Monetarist Arithmetic
Does monetizing a deficit result in a higher or a lower rate of inflation than does bond financing the same deficit? Sargent and Wallace (1981) produced conditions under which bond finance leads to a higher rate of inflation than deficit monetization ("unpleasant monetarist arithmetic''). However, it has been argued that unpleasant arithmetic is unlikely to obtain in practice, as it requires a number of conditions to hold that are rarely satisfied empirically. We develop a model essentially identical to that of Sargent and Wallace, and modify it to allow for a simple type of financial intermediation that they exogenously precluded. In the presence of reserve requirements, unpleasant arithmetic arises even when the real rate of growth exceeds the real return on bonds. Moreover, under a very mild restriction on the interest elasticity of savings, there exists a unique equilibrium to which unpleasant arithmetic results necessarily apply. No "Laffer curve'' considerations arise. We also discuss various tensions that arise between determinacy and efficiency of monetary equilibria.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||01 Aug 1998|
|Publication status:||Published in Canadian Journal of Economics, August 1998, vol. 31 no. 3, pp. 596-623|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Iowa State University, Dept. of Economics, 260 Heady Hall, Ames, IA 50011-1070|
Phone: +1 515.294.6741
Fax: +1 515.294.0221
Web page: http://www.econ.iastate.edu
More information through EDIRC