IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc98287.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The 2015 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard

Author

Abstract

The 2015 EU R&D Scoreboard reports economic and financial information on the world's top 2500 companies that invested €607.2 billion in R&D over the last fiscal year (2014). It comprises 608 companies based in the EU, 829 companies based in the US, 360 in Japan and 703 from the rest of the world. Key findings from the 2015 Scoreboard: - In 2014, the top world 2500 R&D Scoreboard companies raised their R&D by 6.8%, while revenues continued to grow at a significant lower pace (2.2%). - Companies based in the EU showed an annual R&D investment growth rate of 3.3%, slightly improving the previous year's performance (2.6%). Companies based in the US showed a stronger R&D investment growth rate (8.1%). The Chinese companies, 3rd largest country by number of companies in this edition, increased R&D investments by 23.6%. - Companies in the ICT, Pharmaceuticals and Automobiles sectors continue to dominate the top 10 places in the world ranking. As in the previous edition, the top R&D investors are Volkswagen, Samsung, Microsoft, Intel and Novartis. The most significant changes at the top of the ranking in 2014 are the climb of Google to 6th place (from 9th), and of Pfizer to the 10th place (from 15th). Huawei (15th) and Apple (18th) accelerated in 2014 their race to the top, jumping 11 and 16 positions respectively. - An analysis of the patent portfolios of the world's top R&D investors shows that EU and US companies have the highest degrees of internationalisation of their inventive activities: 26% and 22% of their patent families are developed by inventors located outside the region. While the US appear to be the preferred location for health related inventions (pharma and biotech in particular), Europe is the most attractive place for the inventive activities of automobile companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Hector Hernandez Guevara & Fernando Hervas Soriano & Alexander Tuebke & Antonio Vezzani & Mafini Dosso & Sara Amoroso & Nicola Grassano & Alexander Coad & Petros Gkotsis, 2015. "The 2015 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard," JRC Research Reports JRC98287, Joint Research Centre.
    • Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc98287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC98287
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. L. Aldieri & C. P. Vinci, 2018. "Innovation effects on employment in high-tech and low-tech industries: evidence from large international firms within the triad," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 8(2), pages 229-243, June.
    2. Jacob Rubæk Holm & Bram Timmermans & Christian Richter Østergaard & Alex Coad & Nicola Grassano & Antonio Vezzani, 2020. "Labor mobility from R&D-intensive multinational companies: implications for knowledge and technology transfer," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1562-1584, October.
    3. Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello, 2016. "Sector dynamics and demographics of top R&D firms in the global economy," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2016-06, Joint Research Centre.
    4. Tommaso Ciarli & André Lorentz & Marco Valente & Maria Savona, 2019. "Structural changes and growth regimes," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 119-176, March.
    5. CATTARUZZO Sebastiano, 2020. "On R&D sectoral intensities and convergence clubs," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2020-01, Joint Research Centre.
    6. Ingenbleek, Paul T.M. & Zhao, Yuan, 2018. "Hutten catering: how to organize innovation for vital consumers in a sustainable food system?," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(5).
    7. Gershman, Mikhail & Bredikhin, Sergey & Vishnevskiy, Konstantin, 2016. "The role of corporate foresight and technology roadmapping in companies' innovation development: The case of Russian state-owned enterprises," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 187-195.
    8. Sara Amoroso & Simone Vannuccini, 2019. "Teaming up with Large R&D Investors: Good or Bad for Knowledge Production and Diffusion?," SPRU Working Paper Series 2019-20, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    9. Petros Gkotsis & Antonio Vezzani, 2019. "Heterogeneity of technology-specific R&D investments. Evidence from top R&D investors worldwide," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2018-04, Joint Research Centre.
    10. Nicola Grassano & Alexander Coad & Jacob Holm & Christian Ostergaard & Bram Timmermans & Antonio Vezzani, 2018. "R&D Intensive Corporations and the Job Market: The Danish Case," JRC Research Reports JRC112709, Joint Research Centre.
    11. Patricia Laurens & Christian Le Bas & Stéphane Lhuillery & Antoine Schoen, 2017. "The determinants of cleaner energy innovations of the world’s largest firms: the impact of firm learning and knowledge capital," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 311-333, May.
    12. Alexander Coad & Nicola Grassano, 2016. "Whos doing who? Growth of sales, employment, assets, profits and R&D entangled in a curious five-way love triangle," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2016-03, Joint Research Centre.
    13. Justus Baron & Cher Li & Shukhrat Nasirov, 2019. "Why do R&D-intensive firms participate in standards organizations? The role of patents and product-market position," Discussion Papers 2019-16, University of Nottingham, GEP.
    14. Mark J. Greeven & George S. Yip, 2021. "Six paths to Chinese company innovation," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 17-33, March.
    15. Coad, Alex, 2019. "Persistent heterogeneity of R&D intensities within sectors: Evidence and policy implications," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 37-50.
    16. Hockmann, Heinrich & Garzon Delvaux, Pedro Andres & Voigt, Peter & Ciaian, Pavel & Gomez y Paloma, Sergio, 2018. "Corporate R&D and the performance of food-processing firms: Evidence from Europe, Japan and North America," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 7(3), pages 233-247.
    17. Pierre-Jean Benghozi & Elisa Salvador & Jean-Paul Simon, 2015. "Looking for R&D in the creative industries," Post-Print hal-02123893, HAL.
    18. Csomós György, 2017. "Mapping Spatial and Temporal Changes of Global Corporate Research and Development Activities by Conducting a Bibliometric Analysis," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 36(1), pages 65-77, March.
    19. Francesco COREA, 2015. "What Finance Can Learn from Biopharma Industry: A Transfer of Innovation Models," Expert Journal of Finance, Sprint Investify, vol. 3(1), pages 45-53.
    20. Tóth, Géza & Csomós, György, 2016. "Mapping the position of cities in corporate research and development through a gravity model-based bidimensional regression analysis," MPRA Paper 74512, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Chuanyi Wang & Jiale Yang & Zhe Cheng & Chaoqun Ni, 2019. "Postgraduate Education of Board Members and R&D Investment—Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-17, November.
    22. Gundars Kulikovskis & Diana Petraityte & Stamenov Blagoy, 2016. "RIO Country Report 2015: Latvia," JRC Research Reports JRC101203, Joint Research Centre.
    23. Jacob Rubak Holm & Bram Timmermans & Christian Richter Ostergaard & Alexander Coad & Nicola Grassano & Antonio Vezzani, 2019. "Labor mobility from R&D-intensive multinational companies: Implications for knowledge and technology," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2019-06, Joint Research Centre.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc98287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.