IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ind/igiwpp/2015-033.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Building an institution of insolvency practitioners in India

Author

Listed:
  • Anirudh Burman

    (Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research)

  • Shubho Roy

    (Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research)

Abstract

A good insolvency and bankruptcy regime ensures the prompt and fair resolution of financial distress. This paper identifies the rationale for creating a cadre of insolvency professionals who can play an important role in the process of rescuing, restructuring or liquidating a distressed firm. It proposes that the primary objective of creating a regulated cadre of professionals is to protect consumers i.e. the distressed firm and creditors of such firms. The primary task of regulating such professionals should be left to Self Regulatory Organisations (SROs). The state should, in turn, regulate these SROs to ensure that they are discharging their functions effectively. The paper cites evidence from other areas where SROs have played an effective regulatory role in protecting consumers. Finally, the paper ends by providing prescriptions on the regulatory framework for insolvency professionals and the SROs that would regulate them.

Suggested Citation

  • Anirudh Burman & Shubho Roy, 2015. "Building an institution of insolvency practitioners in India," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2015-033, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
  • Handle: RePEc:ind:igiwpp:2015-033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.igidr.ac.in/pdf/publication/WP-2015-033.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter M. DeMarzo & Michael J. Fishman & Kathleen M. Hagerty, 2005. "Self-Regulation and Government Oversight," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 72(3), pages 687-706.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boone, Jan, 2015. "Basic versus supplementary health insurance: Moral hazard and adverse selection," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 50-58.
    2. Joshua Tasoff, 2014. "Placation and provocation," Rationality and Society, , vol. 26(1), pages 73-104, February.
    3. Boone, J., 2014. "Basic versus Supplementary Health Insurance : The Role of Cost Effectiveness and Prevalence," Other publications TiSEM be4cbf5b-f13b-460a-a9cc-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Boone, J., 2014. "Basic Versus Supplementary Health Insurance : Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection," Other publications TiSEM 8ad45428-2ab4-406f-bbd3-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Michał Krawczyk & Krzysztof Szczygielski, 2019. "Do professions curb free-riding? An experiment," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 361-376, June.
    6. Silvester Van Koten & Andreas Ortmann, 2016. "Self-Regulatory Organizations under the Shadow of Governmental Oversight: An Experimental Investigation," Research in Experimental Economics, in: Experiments in Organizational Economics, volume 19, pages 85-104, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    7. Baule, Rainer & Münchhalfen, Patrick & Shkel, David & Tallau, Christian, 2023. "Fair-washing in the market for structured retail products? Voluntary self-regulation versus government regulation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    8. Ormazabal, Gaizka, 2018. "The Role of Stakeholders in Corporate Governance: A View from Accounting Research," CEPR Discussion Papers 12775, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    9. Mary Gugerty, 2009. "Signaling virtue: voluntary accountability programs among nonprofit organizations," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 42(3), pages 243-273, August.
    10. Chang Ma, 2020. "Self-regulation versus government regulation: an externality view," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 166-183, December.
    11. Michiel Bijlsma & Jan Boone & Gijsbert Zwart, 2014. "Competition leverage: how the demand side affects optimal risk adjustment," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 45(4), pages 792-815, December.
    12. Lampe, Ryan & McRae, Shaun, 2021. "Self-regulation vs state regulation: Evidence from cinema age restrictions," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    13. Sofia Johan, 2008. "Global Market Surveillance," American Law and Economics Review, Oxford University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 454-506.
    14. Bendikov, Mikhail & Kolesnik, Georgiy, 2013. "Конкуренция Саморегулируемых Организаций И Эффективность Рынков [Self-regulatory organizations competition and the market efficiency]," MPRA Paper 47812, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Silvester Van Koten, 2015. "Self-Regulatory Organizations Under the Shadow of Governmental Oversight: Blossom Or Perish?," RSCAS Working Papers 2015/84, European University Institute.
    16. Ismail Saglam, 2023. "Incentives of a monopolist for innovation under regulatory threat," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 41-66, March.
    17. Boone, J., 2014. "Basic Versus Supplementary Health Insurance : Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection," Other publications TiSEM 6bf0e55c-e004-4c9e-8065-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Boone, J., 2014. "Basic versus Supplementary Health Insurance : The Role of Cost Effectiveness and Prevalence," Discussion Paper 2014-065, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    19. Carole Comerton-Forde & Tālis J. Putniņš, 2014. "Stock Price Manipulation: Prevalence and Determinants," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 18(1), pages 23-66.
    20. Bruce Ian Carlin & Simon Gervais, 2012. "Legal Protection in Retail Financial Markets," The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 68-108.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Insolvency resolution; bankruptcy resolution; specialised professionals; regulation; consumer protection;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G33 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Bankruptcy; Liquidation
    • K22 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Business and Securities Law
    • K23 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ind:igiwpp:2015-033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Shamprasad M. Pujar (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/igidrin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.