IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ilo/ilowps/992212943402676.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Institutional constraints to the choice of appropriate construction technology

Author

Listed:
  • Drewer S.

Abstract

Working paper on institutional obstacles to the choice of appropriate construction techniques (choice of technology) in developing countries - discusses the role of the construction industry in economic and social development, the choice of techniques and building materials in developing and developed countries, political aspects, economic implications of construction growth, etc., and includes a case studies of Mauritius. Bibliography pp. 95 and 96, questionnaire and statistical tables.

Suggested Citation

  • Drewer S., 1982. "Institutional constraints to the choice of appropriate construction technology," ILO Working Papers 992212943402676, International Labour Organization.
    • Handle: RePEc:ilo:ilowps:992212943402676
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/1982/82B09_778_engl.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frances Stewart, 1978. "Technology and Underdevelopment," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, edition 0, number 978-1-349-15932-1, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haiwen Zhou, 2013. "The Choice of Technology and Rural-Urban Migration in Economic Development," Frontiers of Economics in China-Selected Publications from Chinese Universities, Higher Education Press, vol. 8(3), pages 337-361, September.
    2. Daron Acemoglu & Fabrizio Zilibotti, 2001. "Productivity Differences," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 116(2), pages 563-606.
    3. Christine Greenhalgh, 2013. "Science, Technology, Innovation and IP in India: New Directions and Prospects," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2013n37, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    4. Jerzmanowski, Michal & Tamura, Robert, 2019. "Directed technological change & cross-country income differences: A quantitative analysis," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    5. Thomas Aronsson & Sugata Ghosh & Ronald Wendner, 2023. "Positional preferences and efficiency in a dynamic economy," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 61(2), pages 311-337, August.
    6. Sanghamitra Chakravarty & Georgina Mercedes Gómez, 2024. "A Development Lens to Frugal Innovation: Bringing Back Production and Technological Capabilities into the Discourse," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 36(1), pages 82-101, February.
    7. Shamsavari, Ali & Taha, Yasser & Adikibi, Owen, 2002. "Technology and technology transfer: some basic issues," Economics Discussion Papers 2002-5, School of Economics, Kingston University London.
    8. Jayne, T. S. & Takavarasha, T. & van Zyl, Johan, 1994. "Interactions Between Food Market Reform And Regional Trade In Zimbabwe And South Africa: Implications For Food Security," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 33(4), December.
    9. Gustav Ranis & Frances Stewart, 2000. "Strategies for Success in Human Development," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 49-69.
    10. Mancini, Lorenzo & Paz, María José, 2018. "Oil sector and technological development: Effects of the mandatory research and development (R&D) investment clause on oil companies in Brazil," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 131-143.
    11. Nikhil Sinha, 1994. "Les technologies de l'information et la perspective du chômage technologique dans les pays en développement," Revue Tiers Monde, Programme National Persée, vol. 35(138), pages 411-424.
    12. Tuna Dinç, 2012. "The Two Sector Model of Learning-By Doing and Productivity Differences," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 59(5), pages 583-598, December.
    13. Daron Acemoglu, 2002. "Directed Technical Change," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 69(4), pages 781-809.
    14. Jianghua Zhou & Hao Jiao & Jizhen Li, 2017. "Providing Appropriate Technology for Emerging Markets: Case Study on China’s Solar Thermal Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-21, January.
    15. Puerto, Sergio, 2023. "Agriculture, innovation, and development: What happens when new technology is not good enough?," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335821, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. House, William J., 1980. "Technological choice, employment generation, income distribution and consumer demand: the case of furniture making in Kenya," ILO Working Papers 992032993402676, International Labour Organization.
    17. Scuotto, Veronica & Beatrice, Orlando & Valentina, Cillo & Nicotra, Melita & Di Gioia, Leonardo & Farina Briamonte, Massimiliano, 2020. "Uncovering the micro-foundations of knowledge sharing in open innovation partnerships: An intention-based perspective of technology transfer," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    18. Khwaja, Asim Ijaz, 2001. "Can Good Projects Succeed in Bad Communities? Collective Action in the Himalayas," Working Paper Series rwp01-043, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    19. Daron Acemoglu, 2003. "Patterns of Skill Premia," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 70(2), pages 199-230.
    20. Mehmet AKYOL, 2016. "Effectiveness of State Aid for Investments In The Process of Economic Growth: Turkish Case," Turkish Economic Review, KSP Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 391-400, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ilo:ilowps:992212943402676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vesa Sivunen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ilounch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.