IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hit/tdbcdp/e-2021-03.html

The Development Process, Scale and Scope of Console Game Industry in Japan: Through Analysis of a Multiple Connected Dataset

Author

Listed:
  • HARA, Yasushi
  • Huang, Wei
  • Fukuda, Kazufumi
  • Ikuine, Fumihiko

Abstract

How has the Japanese game industry developed? What impact have the changes in game hardware and the emergence of smartphones had on the game industry? There have been several studies addressing this question (Shintaku et al. 2003, Storz 2008, Uemura et al. 2013, Koyama 2016). Most existing studies, however, have primarily relied on qualitative research methods, based on surveys and interviews of respondents. In contrast, this study tackles the same question with a data science approach. By doing so, we hope to compleme nt the results of previous studies. We will combine several databases created for different purposes in our approach. One such database is that of Teikoku Databank (Corporate DB), which provides information on the financial and credit standing of companies. The others are the "RCGS Collection," a catalog of the holdings of the Game Research Center of Ritsumeikan University, and the "Media Arts Database," a comprehensive catalog of media arts by the Agency for Cultural Affairs (bibliography DBs), which were created to understand the cultural value of games. Using the bibliography databases to link the entities of organizations involved in publishing and developing products to the aspects of corporate management in the corporate database, we aim to clarify both the reality of the economy that supports culture and the context of culture created from economic intentions. This study focuses on the same market among t he game industry since the main target of the bibliographic database is home video game software (Console Game Industry).Based on the dataset we developed, we verified existing findings about the size and scope of the industry (Console Game Industry) and discovered new ones. In terms of the number of companies involved in the industry, the 2000s represented the largest number. As for the number of companies entering the industry, we found it increasing continuously until the early 2000s, and then stagnating after 2010 (Figure. 1).. For the average number of employees, we confirmed a gradual decrease until the early 2000s (Figure. 2). Additionally, we found that capital increased rapidly in the 1980s (Figure. 3), and sales decreased after the mid-1990s (Figure. 4). Our future plans include using transaction data from the corporate database in order to clarify the formation and development of transaction networks. We will also examine the eff ect of events such as the shift in game hardware generations and the emergence of smart phones.

Suggested Citation

  • HARA, Yasushi & Huang, Wei & Fukuda, Kazufumi & Ikuine, Fumihiko, 2021. "The Development Process, Scale and Scope of Console Game Industry in Japan: Through Analysis of a Multiple Connected Dataset," TDB-CAREE Discussion Paper Series E-2021-03, Teikoku Databank Center for Advanced Empirical Research on Enterprise and Economy, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.
  • Handle: RePEc:hit:tdbcdp:e-2021-03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hit-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2056438/files/070careeDP-E-2103.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Klepper, Steven & Simons, Kenneth L., 2005. "Industry shakeouts and technological change," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 23(1-2), pages 23-43, February.
    2. Storz, Cornelia, 2008. "Dynamics in innovation systems: Evidence from Japan's game software industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 1480-1491, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Henrekson, Magnus & Johansson, Dan, 2010. "Firm Growth, Institutions and Structural Transformation," Ratio Working Papers 150, The Ratio Institute.
    2. Gustavo Rinaldi, 2008. "The disadvantage of entrants: did transition eliminate it? The case of the Russian footwear industry (1992–2000)," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 35(1), pages 105-128, March.
    3. Roger Hayter & Klaus Edenhoffer, 2016. "Evolutionary Geography of a Mature Resource Sector: Shakeouts and Shakeins in British Columbia's Forest Industries 1980 to 2008," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 497-519, December.
    4. Diego Comin & Ramana Nanda, 2019. "Financial Development and Technology Diffusion," IMF Economic Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Monetary Fund, vol. 67(2), pages 395-419, June.
    5. Fragkandreas, Thanos, 2025. "Case study research on innovation systems: Paradox, dialectical analysis and resolution," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    6. Luis Cabral & Zhu Wang & Daniel Yi Xu, 2018. "Competitor, Complementors, Parents and Places: Explaining Regional Agglomeration in the U.S. Auto Industry," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 30, pages 1-29, October.
    7. Franziska Handrich & Sven Heidenreich & Tobias Kraemer, 2022. "Innovate or game over? Examining effects of product innovativeness on video game success," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 987-1002, June.
    8. Yang, Chia-Hsuan & Nugent, Rebecca & Fuchs, Erica R.H., 2016. "Gains from others’ losses: Technology trajectories and the global division of firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 724-745.
    9. Sanderson, Susan Walsh & Simons, Kenneth L., 2014. "Light emitting diodes and the lighting revolution: The emergence of a solid-state lighting industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(10), pages 1730-1746.
    10. Huang, Ping & Negro, Simona O. & Hekkert, Marko P. & Bi, Kexin, 2016. "How China became a leader in solar PV: An innovation system analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 777-789.
    11. Jackie Krafft, 2004. "Shakeout in industrial dynamics: new developments, new puzzles," Chapters, in: John Foster & Werner Hölzl (ed.), Applied Evolutionary Economics and Complex Systems, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Storz, Cornelia & Riboldazzi, Federico & John, Moritz, 2015. "Mobility and innovation: A cross-country comparison in the video games industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 121-137.
    13. Najda-Janoszka, Marta, 2017. "Industry Transition - Challenges for Value Capture," MPRA Paper 81919, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Thanos Fragkandreas, 2021. "Innovation Systems and Income Inequality: In Search of Causal Mechanisms," Working Papers 56, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised Nov 2021.
    15. Krafft, Jackie & Lechevalier, Sebastien & Quatraro, Francesco & Storz, Cornelia, 2014. "Emergence and evolution of new industries: The path-dependent dynamics of knowledge creation. An introduction to the special section," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(10), pages 1663-1665.
    16. Peter Neuhäusler & Torben Schubert & Rainer Frietsch & Knut Blind, 2016. "Managing portfolio risk in strategic technology management: evidence from a panel data-set of the world's largest R&D performers," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(7), pages 651-667, October.
    17. Magnus Henrekson & Dan Johansson, 2010. "Gazelles as job creators: a survey and interpretation of the evidence," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 227-244, September.
    18. Matthew Mitchell & Andrzej Skrzypacz, 2015. "A Theory of Market Pioneers, Dynamic Capabilities, and Industry Evolution," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(7), pages 1598-1614, July.
    19. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/6121 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Sven-Olov Daunfeldt & Niklas Elert & Dan Johansson, 2014. "The Economic Contribution of High-Growth Firms: Do Policy Implications Depend on the Choice of Growth Indicator?," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 337-365, September.
    21. Andreas Pyka & Uwe Cantner & Alfred Greiner & Thomas Kuhn (ed.), 2009. "Recent Advances in Neo-Schumpeterian Economics," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 12982.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hit:tdbcdp:e-2021-03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Digital Resources Section, Hitotsubashi University Library (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tchitjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.