IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/nhhfms/2020_005.html

Sampling risk evaluations in a tax fraud case: Some modelling issues

Author

Listed:

Abstract

This work is a follow-up to Lillestøl (2019). The context is the use of sample data to support claims of tax fraud at eateries, where the possibilities of embezzlement are overreporting of take-away sales and underreporting of cash payments. Ratios of sales amounts of opposing types are computed from the sample and used as estimates for the true yearly ratios. Decisions are made by comparison with the reported ratios in the taxpayer’s yearly income statement, allowing for sampling risk. To this end, a “risk distribution” is established and its quantiles used as decision limits. There are different ways of doing the calculation and to establish the accompanying risk distribution, among them models based on Gamma-assumptions, as detailed in Lillestøl (2019). They may lead to different results, more or less favorable to the taxpayer. The chosen method therefore must be fair and defensible. In this connection, some relevant issues have surfaced, mainly related to independence and conditioning. The objective of this paper is to explore these issues and provide some recommendations on the choice of method.

Suggested Citation

  • Lillestøl, Jostein, 2020. "Sampling risk evaluations in a tax fraud case: Some modelling issues," Discussion Papers 2020/5, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:hhs:nhhfms:2020_005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2654220
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sturtz, Sibylle & Ligges, Uwe & Gelman, Andrew, 2005. "R2WinBUGS: A Package for Running WinBUGS from R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 12(i03).
    2. Dimitris Karlis, 2003. "An EM algorithm for multivariate Poisson distribution and related models," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 63-77.
    3. Karlis, Dimitris & Ntzoufras, Ioannis, 2005. "Bivariate Poisson and Diagonal Inflated Bivariate Poisson Regression Models in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 14(i10).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Su Pei-Fang & Mau Yu-Lin & Guo Yan & Li Chung-I & Liu Qi & Boice John D. & Shyr Yu, 2017. "Bivariate Poisson models with varying offsets: an application to the paired mitochondrial DNA dataset," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 47-58, March.
    2. Simos G. Meintanis & Joseph Ngatchou-Wandji & Leonard Santana & Marius Smuts, 2025. "Goodness-of-fit tests for discrete response models with covariates," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 66(3), pages 1-36, April.
    3. Sobom M. Somé & Célestin C. Kokonendji & Nawel Belaid & Smail Adjabi & Rahma Abid, 2023. "Bayesian local bandwidths in a flexible semiparametric kernel estimation for multivariate count data with diagnostics," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(3), pages 843-865, September.
    4. Lachaud, Michée A. & Bravo-Ureta, Boris E., 2022. "A Bayesian statistical analysis of return to agricultural R&D investment in Latin America: Implications for food security," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    5. Fokianos, Konstantinos, 2024. "Multivariate Count Time Series Modelling," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 100-116.
    6. Luke S. Benz & Michael J. Lopez, 2023. "Estimating the change in soccer’s home advantage during the Covid-19 pandemic using bivariate Poisson regression," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 107(1), pages 205-232, March.
    7. Yu, Jun, 2012. "A semiparametric stochastic volatility model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 167(2), pages 473-482.
    8. F. Novoa-Muñoz & M. Jiménez-Gamero, 2014. "Testing for the bivariate Poisson distribution," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 77(6), pages 771-793, August.
    9. Kramer, Michael R. & Cooper, Hannah L. & Drews-Botsch, Carolyn D. & Waller, Lance A. & Hogue, Carol R., 2010. "Metropolitan isolation segregation and Black-White disparities in very preterm birth: A test of mediating pathways and variance explained," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(12), pages 2108-2116, December.
    10. Kalema, George & Molenberghs, Geert, 2016. "Generating Correlated and/or Overdispersed Count Data: A SAS Implementation," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 70(c01).
    11. J. James Reade & Carl Singleton & Alasdair Brown, 2021. "Evaluating strange forecasts: The curious case of football match scorelines," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 68(2), pages 261-285, May.
    12. Federico ANDREIS & Pier Alda FERRARI, 2015. "Customer Satisfaction Evaluation Using Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models," Departmental Working Papers 2015-25, Department of Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods at Università degli Studi di Milano.
    13. Liang, Zhongyao & Qian, Song S. & Wu, Sifeng & Chen, Huili & Liu, Yong & Yu, Yanhong & Yi, Xuan, 2019. "Using Bayesian change point model to enhance understanding of the shifting nutrients-phytoplankton relationship," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 393(C), pages 120-126.
    14. Ramon Clèries & Maria Buxó & Mireia Vilardell & Alberto Ameijide & José Miguel Martínez & Rebeca Font & Rafael Marcos-Gragera & Montse Puigdemont & Gemma Viñas & Marià Carulla & Josep Alfons Espinàs &, 2022. "No Excess Mortality up to 10 Years in Early Stages of Breast Cancer in Women Adherent to Oral Endocrine Therapy: A Probabilistic Graphical Modeling Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-17, March.
    15. Greves Grow, H. Mollie & Cook, Andrea J. & Arterburn, David E. & Saelens, Brian E. & Drewnowski, Adam & Lozano, Paula, 2010. "Child obesity associated with social disadvantage of children's neighborhoods," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 584-591, August.
    16. Qian Wu & Monique Vanerum & Anouk Agten & Andrés Christiansen & Frank Vandenabeele & Jean-Michel Rigo & Rianne Janssen, 2021. "Certainty-Based Marking on Multiple-Choice Items: Psychometrics Meets Decision Theory," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(2), pages 518-543, June.
    17. Horrocks, Julie & Rueffer, Matthew, 2014. "A Bayesian approach to estimating animal density from binary acoustic transects," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 17-25.
    18. Sakshaug Joseph W. & Wiśniowski Arkadiusz & Ruiz Diego Andres Perez & Blom Annelies G., 2019. "Supplementing Small Probability Samples with Nonprobability Samples: A Bayesian Approach," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 35(3), pages 653-681, September.
    19. Faustine Regnier & Etienne Le Bihan & Christine Tichit & Michèle Baumann, 2019. "Adolescent Body Dissatisfaction in Contrasting Socioeconomic Milieus, Coming from a French and Luxembourgish Context," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Andy Vekeman & Michel Meulders & Alain Praet & Jan Colpaert & Tom Van Puyenbroeck, 2015. "Contingent Valuation of a Classic Cycling Race," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 16(3), pages 268-294, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C00 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - General
    • C10 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - General
    • C11 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Bayesian Analysis: General
    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:nhhfms:2020_005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stein Fossen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dfnhhno.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.