IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/luekhi/0272.html

Quantifying the brokerage power of Swedish innovation agencies, 1970-2021

Author

Listed:
  • Fink, Johanna

    (Department of Economic History, Lund University)

Abstract

Collaborative innovation has emerged as a way to share risks and costs associated with the innovation process. However, identifying and establishing contact with suitable collaboration partners proves challenging. To overcome this barrier, knowledge brokers, such as innovation agencies or universities, can step in to bridge contacts between innovative firms. This paper provides a long-term case study, estimating the brokerage power of Swedish innovation agencies using indicators from social network analysis. Additionally, the paper addresses the question whether collaborations involving innovation agencies differ from those established in their absence, based on a probabilistic regression model. To the author’s best knowledge, this study provides the first quantitative assessment of the brokerage power of an innovation agency. Sweden is of particular interest because it ranks among the world’s most innovative countries and was among the first to establish a second-generation innovation agency focused on promoting applied research. Data for the analysis is obtained from SWINNO, a database of significant Swedish innovations (1970–2021), which has been linked to a database over public innovation funding in Sweden (1968–2023). The sample consists of 1,392 innovative firms that engage in the development of collaborative innovations. Two dimensions of innovation agency involvement are considered: (1) direct provision of public funding, and (2) knowledge exchange through public funding applications. The results reveal that Swedish innovation agencies yield substantial brokerage power, being in direct contact with 40-70% of innovative firms, and intermediaries for 40-80% of potential collaborators. Moreover, collaborations brokered by innovation agencies are more likely to be associated with the emergence of local clusters, collaborations between firms differing in public ownership and initial contacts. Although the study does not directly identify network additionality, the results suggest that innovation agency involvement is associated with the formation of otherwise unlikely partnerships.

Suggested Citation

  • Fink, Johanna, 2026. "Quantifying the brokerage power of Swedish innovation agencies, 1970-2021," Lund Papers in Economic History 272, Lund University, Department of Economic History.
    • Handle: RePEc:hhs:luekhi:0272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lucris.lub.lu.se/ws/portalfiles/portal/259012443/LUPEH_272.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kang, Moon Jung & Hwang, Jongwoon, 2016. "Structural dynamics of innovation networks funded by the European Union in the context of systemic innovation of the renewable energy sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 471-490.
    2. Fink, Johanna & Torregrosa-Hetland, Sara, 2026. "The effect of public funding on Swedish innovation, 1970-2001," Lund Papers in Economic History 270, Lund University, Department of Economic History.
    3. María Jesús Nieto & Lluís Santamaría, 2010. "Technological Collaboration: Bridging the Innovation Gap between Small and Large Firms," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(1), pages 44-69, January.
    4. Expósito-Langa, Manuel & López-Sánchez, María José & Valdivieso-Uvidia, Jeanneth Marcela & Golf-Laville, Emilio, 2026. "What do firms need to broker knowledge in clusters? absorptive capacity and institutional connectedness. A case study of the Valencian toy Valley," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    5. Jacob Torfing, 2019. "Collaborative innovation in the public sector: the argument," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 1-11, January.
    6. Andrea Filippetti & Antonio Zinilli, 2023. "The innovation networks of city-regions in Europe: exclusive clubs or inclusive hubs?," Working Papers 63, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised 08 Feb 2023.
    7. Abdelmohsen A. Nassani & Crenguta Sinisi & Loredana Paunescu & Zahid Yousaf & Mohamed Haffar & Ahmad Kabbani, 2022. "Nexus of Innovation Network, Digital Innovation and Frugal Innovation towards Innovation Performance: Investigation of Energy Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-11, April.
    8. Torregrosa-Hetland, Sara & Pelkonen, Antti & Oksanen, Juha & Kander, Astrid, 2019. "The prevalence of publicly stimulated innovations –A comparison of Finland and Sweden, 1970–2013," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 1373-1384.
    9. Kirkels, Yvonne & Duysters, Geert, 2010. "Brokerage in SME networks," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 375-385, April.
    10. Richard R. Nelson, 1959. "The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 67(3), pages 297-297.
    11. Caloffi, Annalisa & Mariani, Marco & Rossi, Federica & Russo, Margherita, 2018. "A comparative evaluation of regional subsidies for collaborative and individual R&D in small and medium-sized enterprises," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8), pages 1437-1447.
    12. Lennart Schon & Olle Krantz, 2012. "The Swedish economy in the early modern period: constructing historical national accounts," European Review of Economic History, European Historical Economics Society, vol. 16(4), pages 529-549, November.
    13. Filippetti, Andrea & Zinilli, Antonio, 2023. "The innovation networks of city‐regions in Europe: Exclusive clubs or inclusive hubs?," Papers in Regional Science, Elsevier, vol. 102(6), pages 1169-1193.
    14. Hottenrott, Hanna & Lopes-Bento, Cindy, 2014. "(International) R&D collaboration and SMEs: The effectiveness of targeted public R&D support schemes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 1055-1066.
    15. Martina Kauffeld-Monz & Michael Fritsch, 2013. "Who Are the Knowledge Brokers in Regional Systems of Innovation? A Multi-Actor Network Analysis," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(5), pages 669-685, May.
    16. Philipp Jonas Kreutzer & Josef Taalbi, 2026. "Collaboration for the Bioeconomy -- Evidence from Innovation Output in Sweden, 1970-2021," Papers 2602.05112, arXiv.org.
    17. Lerner, Josh, 1999. "The Government as Venture Capitalist: The Long-Run Impact of the SBIR Program," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 72(3), pages 285-318, July.
    18. Sjöö, Karolin & Taalbi, Josef & Kander, Astrid & Ljungberg, Jonas, 2014. "SWINNO: A Database of Swedish Innovations, 1970-2007," Lund Papers in Economic History 133, Lund University, Department of Economic History.
    19. Freeman, Linton C., 1982. "Centered graphs and the structure of ego networks," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 3(3), pages 291-304, October.
    20. Valentina Bucaioni & Gianluca Murgia & Josef Taalbi, 2025. "The impact of explorative and exploitative collaborations on SMEs innovative performance," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(2), pages 463-494, March.
    21. Fink, Johanna & Taalbi, Josef, 2024. "Fueling radical and renewable innovations? An analysis of public innovation funding in Sweden, 1970-2021," Lund Papers in Economic History 260, Lund University, Department of Economic History.
    22. Bronzini, Raffaello & Piselli, Paolo, 2016. "The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 442-457.
    23. Kesidou, Effie & Demirel, Pelin, 2012. "On the drivers of eco-innovations: Empirical evidence from the UK," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 862-870.
    24. Wanzenböck, Iris & Scherngell, Thomas & Fischer, Manfred M., 2013. "How do firm characteristics affect behavioural additionalities of public R&D subsidies? Evidence for the Austrian transport sector," MPRA Paper 77552, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fink, Johanna & Torregrosa-Hetland, Sara, 2026. "The effect of public funding on Swedish innovation, 1970-2001," Lund Papers in Economic History 270, Lund University, Department of Economic History.
    2. Thomas H. W. Ziesemer, 2021. "The Effects of R&D Subsidies and Publicly Performed R&D on Business R&D: A Survey," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 236(1), pages 171-205, March.
    3. Jugend, Daniel & Fiorini, Paula De Camargo & Armellini, Fabiano & Ferrari, Aline Gabriela, 2020. "Public support for innovation: A systematic review of the literature and implications for open innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    4. Ivano D'Antonio & Alessandro De Iudicibus & Giuseppe Piroli & Francesco Savoia, 2014. "Ricerca e innovazione in campania: una valutazione controfattuale della politica di coesione," STUDI ECONOMICI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(113), pages 61-87.
    5. Hyoung Sun Yoo & Chul Lee & Seung-Pyo Jun, 2018. "The Characteristics of SMEs Preferring Cooperative Research and Development Support from the Government: The Case of Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Xing Shi & Yanrui Wu & Dahai Fu & Xiumei Guo & Huaqing Wu, 2019. "Effects of National Science and Technology Programs on Innovation in Chinese Firms," Asian Economic Papers, MIT Press, vol. 18(1), pages 207-236, Winter/Sp.
    7. Aalto, Eero & Gustafsson, Robin, 2020. "Innovation Promotion Rationales and Impacts – A Review," ETLA Reports 99, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    8. Andrea Bellucci & Luca Pennacchio & Alberto Zazzaro, 2019. "Public R&D subsidies: collaborative versus individual place-based programs for SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 213-240, January.
    9. Andrea Bellucci & Luca Pennacchio & Alberto Zazzaro, 2016. "Public subsidies for SME research and development: Empirical evaluation of collaborative versus individual place-based programs," Mo.Fi.R. Working Papers 133, Money and Finance Research group (Mo.Fi.R.) - Univ. Politecnica Marche - Dept. Economic and Social Sciences.
    10. Szücs, Florian, 2018. "Research subsidies, industry–university cooperation and innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(7), pages 1256-1266.
    11. Lixia Liu & Yuanshi Huang & Xueli Zhan, 2019. "The Evolution of Collective Strategies in SMEs’ Innovation: A Tripartite Game Analysis and Application," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-15, October.
    12. Aleksandar Giga & Alexandra Graddy-Reed & Andrea Belz & Richard J. Terrile & Fernando Zapatero, 2022. "Helping the Little Guy: the impact of government awards on small technology firms," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 846-871, June.
    13. Wang, Yanbo & Li, Jizhen & Furman, Jeffrey L., 2017. "Firm performance and state innovation funding: Evidence from China’s innofund program," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 1142-1161.
    14. Grilli, Luca & Murtinu, Samuele, 2018. "Selective subsidies, entrepreneurial founders' human capital, and access to R&D alliances," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10), pages 1945-1963.
    15. Zhao, Bo & Ziedonis, Rosemarie, 2020. "State governments as financiers of technology startups: Evidence from Michigan's R&D loan program," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(4).
    16. Bianchi, Mattia & Murtinu, Samuele & Scalera, Vittoria G., 2019. "R&D Subsidies as Dual Signals in Technological Collaborations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    17. Ren, Shenggang & Hu, Yucai & Zheng, Jingjing & Wang, Yangjie, 2020. "Emissions trading and firm innovation: Evidence from a natural experiment in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    18. Dong Xiang & Roman Matousek & Andrew C. Worthington & Yue Jiang, 2025. "How Do Government Subsidies Affect Innovation? Evidence from Chinese Hi-Tech SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-23, August.
    19. Sara Amoroso & Simone Vannuccini, 2019. "Teaming up with Large R&D Investors: Good or Bad for Knowledge Production and Diffusion?," SPRU Working Paper Series 2019-20, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    20. Dirk Czarnitzki & Julie Delanote, 2015. "R&D policies for young SMEs: input and output effects," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 465-485, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L38 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Public Policy
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:luekhi:0272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Finn Hedefalk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dhlunse.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.