IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/lucirc/2023_006.html

Challenges of studying agency in regional development: What did 27 review reports teach us?

Author

Listed:
  • Sotarauta, Markku

    (Tampere University)

  • Grillitsch, Markus

    (CIRCLE, Lund University)

Abstract

The regional development studies community increasingly considers the significance of agency when working to reveal the secrets of local and regional development. While the rapidly emerging literature on agency has increased our understanding of what people do or fail to do for their regions, many scholars have faced challenges incorporating novel conceptual lenses in a discipline more accustomed to studying structures. With the aim to contribute to a collective learning process, we analyze 27 review reports received for a special issue in Regional Studies on “Agency and Regional Development Against All Odds”. We found challenges, for instance, related to articulating the contribution, conceptual layering and drift, and slippery research questions. These three challenges point to the need to decide on the main concept and theory (the hero of the dish), which is particularly challenging and daunting when it requires sacrificing safe conceptual terrain and exploring a more unknown, emerging field. The authors of the special issue have responded brilliantly to the reviewers’ recommendations and with these reflections, we hope to share this learning experience. The work, however, continues - to improve our capacity to study human agency, we must take pains to clarify meta-theoretical commitments, elaborate middle-range theories, and experiment with a variety of methods. The growing body of work on the relationships between human agency and structures is an exciting ontological, theoretical, and methodological programme in the making.

Suggested Citation

  • Sotarauta, Markku & Grillitsch, Markus, 2023. "Challenges of studying agency in regional development: What did 27 review reports teach us?," Papers in Innovation Studies 2023/6, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    • Handle: RePEc:hhs:lucirc:2023_006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wp.circle.lu.se/upload/CIRCLE/workingpapers/202306_sotarauta.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank Moulaert & Bob Jessop & Abid Mehmood, 2016. "Agency, structure, institutions, discourse (ASID) in urban and regional development," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 167-187, July.
    2. Markus Perkmann, 2007. "Policy Entrepreneurship and Multilevel Governance: A Comparative Study of European Cross-Border Regions," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 25(6), pages 861-879, December.
    3. María-Teresa Méndez-Picazo & Miguel-Ángel Galindo-Martín & Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano, 2012. "Governance, entrepreneurship and economic growth," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(9-10), pages 865-877, December.
    4. Sally Weller & Andrew Beer, 2023. "State structures and the limits of agency: governing the transformation from coal in Australia," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(8), pages 1415-1427, August.
    5. Andrew Beer & Tom Barnes & Sandy Horne, 2023. "Place-based industrial strategy and economic trajectory: advancing agency-based approaches," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(6), pages 984-997, June.
    6. Markus Grillitsch & Markku Sotarauta & Björn Asheim & Rune Dahl Fitjar & Silje Haus-Reve & Jari Kolehmainen & Heli Kurikka & Karl-Johan Lundquist & Mikhail Martynovich & Skirmante Monteilhet & Hjalti , 2023. "Agency and economic change in regions: identifying routes to new path development using qualitative comparative analysis," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(8), pages 1453-1468, August.
    7. Robert Huggins & Piers Thompson, 2023. "Human agency, network dynamics and regional development: the behavioural principles of new path creation," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(8), pages 1469-1481, August.
    8. Markus Steen & Henrik Brynthe Lund & Asbjørn Karlsen, 2023. "The role of state agency in path development: a longitudinal study of two Norwegian manufacturing regions," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(8), pages 1511-1522, August.
    9. Markku Sotarauta & Riina Pulkkinen, 2011. "Institutional Entrepreneurship for Knowledge Regions: In Search of a Fresh Set of Questions for Regional Innovation Studies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 29(1), pages 96-112, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elvira Uyarra & Kieron Flanagan & Edurne Magro & James R Wilson & Markku Sotarauta, 2017. "Understanding regional innovation policy dynamics: Actors, agency and learning," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 35(4), pages 559-568, June.
    2. Alex Hollingsworth & Dave Valler, 2025. "Strategy and dynamics in sub-regional governance and planning: Lessons from Eastern England 2010 to 2020," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 43(5), pages 898-916, August.
    3. Stein, Luiza & Evers, Natasha & O'Gorman, Colm, 2026. "Fostering conditions for digital entrepreneurship: The role of institutional entrepreneurs in driving FinTech ecosystem development," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    4. Melinda Timea FÜLÖP & Mirela-Oana PINTEA, 2014. "Effects Of The New Regulation And Corporate Governance Of The Audit Profession," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 4, pages 545-554, July.
    5. Halyna LYTVYN & Andriy TYUSHKA, 2020. "Rethinking the Governance-Governmentality-Governability nexus at the EU's Eastern Frontiers: the Carpathian Euroregion 2.0 and the future of EU-Ukrainian Cross-Border cooperation," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 11, pages 146-183, November.
    6. Norin Arshed & Sara Carter & Colin Mason, 2014. "The ineffectiveness of entrepreneurship policy: is policy formulation to blame?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 639-659, October.
    7. Maximilian Benner, 2021. "System-level agency and its many shades: How to shape the system for path development?," PEGIS geo-disc-2021_10, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    8. Mahzouni, Arian, 2019. "The role of institutional entrepreneurship in emerging energy communities: The town of St. Peter in Germany," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 297-308.
    9. Karl-Johan Lundquist & Michaela Trippl, 2009. "Towards Cross-Border Innovation Spaces: A theoretical analysis and empirical comparison of the Öresund region and the Centrope area," SRE-Disc sre-disc-2009_05, Institute for Multilevel Governance and Development, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    10. Castaño, María-Soledad & Méndez, María-Teresa & Galindo, Miguel-Ángel, 2015. "The effect of social, cultural, and economic factors on entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1496-1500.
    11. Kristina Zumbusch & Roland Scherer, 2015. "Cross-Border Governance: Balancing Formalized and Less Formalized Co-Operations," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-21, July.
    12. Zhang, Xianchun & Shen, Jianfa & Gao, Xiaoxue, 2021. "Towards a comprehensive understanding of intercity cooperation in China’s city-regionalization: A comparative study of Shenzhen-Hong Kong and Guangzhou-Foshan city groups," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    13. Xiaobo Su, 2013. "From Frontier to Bridgehead: Cross-border Regions and the Experience of Yunnan, China," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 1213-1232, July.
    14. Arnault Morisson & Heike Mayer, 2021. "An agent of change against all odds? The case of Ledger in Vierzon, France," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 36(5), pages 430-447, August.
    15. Paula Fernandez-Wulff, 2019. "Collective Agency in the Making: How Social Innovations in the Food System Practice Democracy beyond Consumption," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 81-93.
    16. Niki Derlukiewicz & Anna Mempel-Śnieżyk & Tomasz Pilewicz & Małgorzata Godlewska, 2021. "Bottom-Up Initiatives Undertaken by Local Governments to Support Entrepreneurship," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
    17. Huang, Chiung-Ju & Ho, Yuan-Hong, 2017. "Governance and economic growth in Asia," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 260-272.
    18. Markku Sotarauta & Nina Mustikkamäki, 2015. "Institutional Entrepreneurship, Power, and Knowledge in Innovation Systems: Institutionalization of Regenerative Medicine in Tampere, Finland," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(2), pages 342-357, April.
    19. Maruseva, Valeria & Kroll, Henning, 2024. "Potential and resilience: Evidence from peripheral regions of Germany," Discussion Papers "Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis" 82, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    20. Robert Hassink & Arne Isaksen & Michaela Trippl, 2019. "Towards a comprehensive understanding of new regional industrial path development," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(11), pages 1636-1645, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • B52 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Modern Monetary Theory;
    • R10 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - General
    • R50 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:lucirc:2023_006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Torben Schubert (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/circlse.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.