IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/gunefd/2022_007.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ending Ecoservices Payments Does Not Crow Out Lab-in-the Field Forest Conservation

Author

Listed:
  • Moros, Lina

    (Universidad de los Andes, School of Management, Bogotá, Colombia.)

  • Vélez, María Alejandro

    (Los Andes University)

  • Pfaff, Alexander

    (Duke University)

  • Quintero, Daniela

    (Los Andes University)

Abstract

Payment for ecosystem services (PES) programs are proliferating globally but not always with significant impact. Unlike protected areas (PAs), PES compensate suppliers of ecoservices, increasing local acceptance. Yet, some worry that PES could reduce conservation in the long run, if the introduction of financial incentives “crowds out” or diminishes prior conservation behavior. We implemented a decision experiment with farmers in rural Colombia to study the effects of temporary PES. We find no crowding out if a PES is introduced then ended. Contributions after PES fall back to pre-PES levels, at worst, and if anything, they are higher. Comparisons to controls without PES strengthen these findings, which can inform policy design.

Suggested Citation

  • Moros, Lina & Vélez, María Alejandro & Pfaff, Alexander & Quintero, Daniela, 2022. "Ending Ecoservices Payments Does Not Crow Out Lab-in-the Field Forest Conservation," EfD Discussion Paper 22-7, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.
  • Handle: RePEc:hhs:gunefd:2022_007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.efdinitiative.org/sites/default/files/publications/MS%201194%20DP%2022-07%20to%20Global%20Hub%20July%207%202022%20Version%202.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    lab-in-the field experiment; pro-environmental behavior; payment for ecosystem services; incentives; Colombia;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q52 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs; Distributional Effects; Employment Effects
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hhs:gunefd:2022_007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Franklin Amuakwa-Mensah (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.efdinitiative.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.