IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/pseptp/halshs-01028149.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Prélèvements et transferts aux ménages : des canaux redistributifs différents en 1990 et 2010

Author

Listed:
  • Alexis Eidelman

    (Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (INSEE))

  • Fabrice Langumier

    (Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (INSEE))

  • Alexis Vicard

    (Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (INSEE), PSE - Paris-Jourdan Sciences Economiques - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris Sciences et Lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

Abstract

Pris dans leur ensemble, les prélèvements et prestations monétaires reposant sur les ménages ont-ils en 2010 un caractère progressif plus ou moins prononcé que vingt ans plus tôt ? Afin d'éclairer cette question, nous appliquons les législations socio-fiscales de 1990 et 2010 à un même échantillon représentatif des ménages français en 2010. Au total, le cœur du système de redistribution monétaire, l'impôt sur le revenu et les prestations, ont perdu en progressivité, tandis qu'en amont dans le processus de taxation, les prélèvements sociaux ont gagné en progressivité. L'impôt sur le revenu a vu son poids diminuer et est devenu nettement moins progressif, cette évolution étant très largement imputable à l'évolution de son barème, et plus marginalement à la multiplication des " niches fiscales ". Dans le même sens, les prestations sociales apparaissent moins redistributives qu'elles ne l'étaient en 1990. Elles ont été le plus souvent revalorisées selon l'inflation, et ont donc évolué moins vite que les revenus moyens de la population, ce qui a affecté leur capacité à réduire les inégalités. À l'inverse, le financement de la protection sociale a été profondément remanié, et ces changements ont joué en faveur de la progressivité. Des contributions (CSG et CRDS), assises sur l'ensemble des revenus, ont été substituées aux cotisations, assises uniquement sur les revenus du travail. Les exonérations de cotisations sociales sur les bas salaires ont également été progressivement renforcées. Selon les hypothèses retenues dans les quatre scénarios élaborés dans cet article, la progressivité d'ensemble du système socio-fiscal n'aurait pas connu d'inflexion majeure entre 1990 et 2010. Toutefois, l'analyse présentée ici ne tient compte ni des prélèvements sur le patrimoine, ni des prélèvements pesant sur les entreprises, alors que leur évolution pourrait avoir davantage affecté les ménages ayant de hauts revenus.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexis Eidelman & Fabrice Langumier & Alexis Vicard, 2013. "Prélèvements et transferts aux ménages : des canaux redistributifs différents en 1990 et 2010," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-01028149, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:pseptp:halshs-01028149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bengtsson, Niklas & Holmlund, Bertil & Waldenström, Daniel, 2012. "Lifetime versus Annual Tax Progressivity: Sweden, 1968–2009," IZA Discussion Papers 6641, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Olivier Bargain, 2010. "Back to the future - decomposition analysis of distributive policies using behavioural simulations," Working Papers 201032, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    3. Anne Laferrère & David le Blanc, 2002. "Comment les aides au logement affectent-elles les loyers ?," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 351(1), pages 3-30.
    4. Stuart Adam & James Browne, 2010. "Redistribution, work incentives and thirty years of UK tax and benefit reform," IFS Working Papers W10/24, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Piketty, Thomas & Bozio, Antoine & Garbinti, Bertrand & Goupille-Lebret, Jonathan & Guillot, Malka, 2020. "Predistribution vs. Redistribution: Evidence from France and the U.S," CEPR Discussion Papers 15415, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mike Brewer & Monica Costa Dias & Jonathan Shaw, 2012. "Lifetime inequality and redistribution," IFS Working Papers W12/23, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    2. De Agostini, Paola & Sutherland, Holly & Hills, John, 2015. "Were we really all in it together? The distributional effects of the 2010-2015 UK Coalition government’s tax-benefit policy changes: an end-of-term update," EUROMOD Working Papers EM13/15, EUROMOD at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    3. Leszek Morawski & Aneta Semeniuk, 2013. "Zakres ubóstwa a reformy podatkowo-świadczeniowe w latach 2006-2010," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 4, pages 21-40.
    4. Peter H. Lindert, 2017. "The Rise and Future of Progressive Redistribution," Commitment to Equity (CEQ) Working Paper Series 73, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
    5. Alpaslan Akay & Olivier B. Bargain & H. Xavier Jara, 2023. "Experienced versus decision utility: large‐scale comparison for income–leisure preferences," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 125(4), pages 823-859, October.
    6. André Decoster & Sergio Perelman & Dieter Vandelannoote & Toon Vanheukelom & Gerlinde Verbist, 2015. "A bird’s eye view on 20 years of tax-benefit reforms in Belgium," Working Papers of Department of Economics, Leuven 494657, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Economics, Leuven.
    7. repec:cep:spccrp:22 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Verbist, Gerlinde & Vandelannoote, Dieter & Decoster, André & Perelman, Sergio & Vanheukelom, Toon, 2015. "A bird’s eye view on 20 years of tax-benefit reforms in Belgium," EUROMOD Working Papers EM10/15, EUROMOD at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    9. Chris Belfield & Claire Crawford & Ellen Greaves & Paul Gregg & Lindsey Macmillan, 2017. "Intergenerational income persistence within families," IFS Working Papers W17/11, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    10. Pierre Madec, 2015. "Faut il réformer les aides personnelles au logement ?," Post-Print hal-01296718, HAL.
    11. Nicholas-James Clavet & Luca Tiberti & Marko Vladisavljevic & Jelena Zarkovic Rakic & Aleksandra Anic & Gorana Krstic & Sasa Randelovic, 2017. "Reduction of child poverty in Serbia: Improved cash-transfers or higher work incentives for parents?," Working Papers PMMA 2017-04, PEP-PMMA.
    12. Sara Torregrosa Hetland, 2015. "Did democracy bring redistribution? Insights from the Spanish tax system, 1960–90," European Review of Economic History, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(3), pages 294-315.
    13. Jorge Martínez-Vázquez & Violeta Vulovic & Blanca Moreno Dodson, 2012. "The Impact of Tax and Expenditure Policies on Income Distribution: Evidence from a Large Panel of Countries," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 200(1), pages 95-130, March.
    14. Pierre Madec, 2015. "Quelle est l'efficacité des aides publiques au logement ?," Post-Print hal-03571234, HAL.
    15. Gabrielle Fack, 2005. "Pourquoi les ménages pauvres paient-ils des loyers de plus en plus élevés ? [L’incidence des aides au logement en France (1973-2002)]," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 381(1), pages 17-40.
    16. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/56mtglm77d8qdorqfd0ckr23no is not listed on IDEAS
    17. John Hills, 2015. "The Coalition's Record on Cash Transfers, Poverty and Inequality 2010-2015," CASE - Social Policy in a Cold Climate Working Paper 11, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    18. Brewer, Mike & Wren-Lewis, Liam, 2012. "Accounting for changes in income inequality: decomposition analyses for Great Britain, 1968-2009," ISER Working Paper Series 2012-17, Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    19. Howarth, David & Marteau, Theresa M. & Coutts, Adam P. & Huppert, Julian L. & Pinto, Pedro Ramos, 2019. "What do the British public think of inequality in health, wealth, and power?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 198-206.
    20. Mike Brewer & Jonathan Shaw, 2018. "How Taxes and Welfare Benefits Affect Work Incentives," Fiscal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(1), pages 5-38, March.
    21. John Creedy, 2013. "Alternative Distributions for Inequality and Poverty Comparisons," Treasury Working Paper Series 13/11, New Zealand Treasury.
    22. Immervoll, Herwig & Richardson, Linda, 2011. "Redistribution Policy and Inequality Reduction in OECD Countries: What Has Changed in Two Decades?," IZA Discussion Papers 6030, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:pseptp:halshs-01028149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Caroline Bauer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.