IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecstat/estat_0336-1454_2013_num_459_1_10007.html

Prélèvements et transferts aux ménages : des canaux redistributifs différents en 1990 et 2010

Author

Listed:
  • Alexis Eidelman
  • Fabrice Langumier
  • Augustin Vicard

Abstract

Pris dans leur ensemble, les prélèvements et prestations monétaires reposant sur les ménages ont-ils en 2010 un caractère progressif plus ou moins prononcé que vingt ans plus tôt ? Afin d'éclairer cette question, nous appliquons les législations socio-fiscales de 1990 et 2010 à un même échantillon représentatif des ménages français en 2010. Au total, le cœur du système de redistribution monétaire, l'impôt sur le revenu et les prestations, ont perdu en progressivité, tandis qu'en amont dans le processus de taxation, les prélèvements sociaux ont gagné en progressivité. L'impôt sur le revenu a vu son poids diminuer et est devenu nettement moins progressif, cette évolution étant très largement imputable à l'évolution de son barème, et plus marginalement à la multiplication des « niches fiscales ». Dans le même sens, les prestations sociales apparaissent moins redistributives qu'elles ne l'étaient en 1990. Elles ont été le plus souvent revalorisées selon l'inflation, et ont donc évolué moins vite que les revenus moyens de la population, ce qui a affecté leur capacité à réduire les inégalités. À l'inverse, le financement de la protection sociale a été profondément remanié, et ces changements ont joué en faveur de la progressivité. Des contributions (CSG et CRDS), assises sur l'ensemble des revenus, ont été substituées aux cotisations, assises uniquement sur les revenus du travail. Les exonérations de cotisations sociales sur les bas salaires ont également été progressivement renforcées. Selon les hypothèses retenues dans les quatre scénarios élaborés dans cet article, la progressivité d'ensemble du système socio-fiscal n'aurait pas connu d'inflexion majeure entre 1990 et 2010. Toutefois, l'analyse présentée ici ne tient compte ni des prélèvements sur le patrimoine, ni des prélèvements pesant sur les entreprises, alors que leur évolution pourrait avoir davantage affecté les ménages ayant de hauts revenus.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Alexis Eidelman & Fabrice Langumier & Augustin Vicard, 2013. "Prélèvements et transferts aux ménages : des canaux redistributifs différents en 1990 et 2010," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 459(1), pages 5-26.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_2013_num_459_1_10007
    DOI: 10.3406/estat.2013.10007
    Note: DOI:10.3406/estat.2013.10007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/estat.2013.10007
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/estat_0336-1454_2013_num_459_1_10007
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/estat.2013.10007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bengtsson, Niklas & Holmlund, Bertil & Waldenström, Daniel, 2012. "Lifetime versus Annual Tax Progressivity: Sweden, 1968–2009," IZA Discussion Papers 6641, IZA Network @ LISER.
    2. Bargain, Olivier B., 2010. "Back to the Future: Decomposition Analysis of Distributive Policies Using Behavioural Simulations," IZA Discussion Papers 5226, IZA Network @ LISER.
    3. Anne Laferrère & David le Blanc, 2002. "Comment les aides au logement affectent-elles les loyers ?," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 351(1), pages 3-30.
    4. Stuart Adam & James Browne, 2010. "Redistribution, work incentives and thirty years of UK tax and benefit reform," IFS Working Papers W10/24, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Piketty, Thomas & Bozio, Antoine & Garbinti, Bertrand & Goupille-Lebret, Jonathan & Guillot, Malka, 2020. "Predistribution vs. Redistribution: Evidence from France and the U.S," CEPR Discussion Papers 15415, Centre for Economic Policy Research.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mike Brewer & Monica Costa Dias & Jonathan Shaw, 2012. "Lifetime inequality and redistribution," IFS Working Papers W12/23, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    2. Anthony B. Atkinson & Chrysa Leventi & Brian Nolan & Holly Sutherland & Iva Tasseva, 2017. "Reducing poverty and inequality through tax-benefit reform and the minimum wage: the UK as a case-study," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 15(4), pages 303-323, December.
    3. Gabrielle Fack, 2005. "Pourquoi les ménages pauvres paient-ils des loyers de plus en plus élevés ?," Post-Print hal-00813575, HAL.
    4. Diego Collado & Bea Cantillon & Karel Van den Bosch & Tim Goedemé & Dieter Vandelannoote, 2016. "The end of cheap talk about poverty reduction: the cost of closing the poverty gap while maintaining work incentives," ImPRovE Working Papers 16/08, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    5. Boschini, Anne & Gunnarsson, Kristin & Roine, Jesper, 2017. "Women in Top Incomes – Evidence from Sweden 1974-2013," Working Paper Series 5/2017, Stockholm University, Swedish Institute for Social Research.
    6. De Agostini, Paola & Hills, John & Sutherland, Holly, 2015. "Were we really all in it together? The distributional effects of the 2010-2015 UK Coalition government's tax-benefit policy changes: an end-of-term update," EUROMOD Working Papers EM13/15, EUROMOD at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    7. Watson, Dorothy & Maître, Bertrand & Whelan, Christopher T., 2012. "Work and Poverty in Ireland: An Analysis of CSO Survey on Income and Living Conditions 2004-2010," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number BKMNEXT226.
    8. De Agostini, Paola & Sutherland, Holly & Hills, John, 2015. "Were we really all in it together? The distributional effects of the 2010-2015 UK Coalition government’s tax-benefit policy changes: an end-of-term update," EUROMOD Working Papers EM13/15, EUROMOD at the Institute for Social and Economic Research.
    9. Anne Laferrère & David le Blanc, 2004. "Gone with the Windfall: How Do Housing Allowances Affect Student Co-residence?," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 50(3), pages 451-477.
    10. André Decoster & Sergio Perelman & Dieter Vandelannoote & Toon Vanheukelom & Gerlinde Verbist, 2019. "Which way the pendulum swings? Equity and efficiency of three decades of tax-benefit reforms in Belgium," Working Papers 1907, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    11. Nolan, Matt, 2018. "New Zealand Wage Equations: 1988-2013," Working Paper Series 20840, Victoria University of Wellington, Chair in Public Finance.
    12. Alpaslan Akay & Olivier B. Bargain & H. Xavier Jara, 2023. "Experienced versus decision utility: large‐scale comparison for income–leisure preferences," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 125(4), pages 823-859, October.
    13. Jorge Mart nez-V zquez & Violeta Vulovic & Blanca Moreno Dodson, 2012. "The Impact of Tax and Expenditure Policies on Income Distribution: Evidence from a Large Panel of Countries," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 200(1), pages 95-130, March.
    14. Leszek Morawski & Aneta Semeniuk, 2013. "Zakres ubóstwa a reformy podatkowo-świadczeniowe w latach 2006-2010," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 4, pages 21-40.
    15. Fack, Gabrielle, 2006. "Are housing benefit an effective way to redistribute income? Evidence from a natural experiment in France," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 747-771, December.
    16. C. Grislain-Letrémy & C. Trevien, 2014. "The Impact of Housing Subsidies on the Rental Sector: the French Example," Documents de Travail de l'Insee - INSEE Working Papers g2014-08, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques.
    17. Peter H. Lindert, 2017. "The Rise and Future of Progressive Redistribution," Commitment to Equity (CEQ) Working Paper Series 73, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
    18. Mike Brewer & Monica Costa Dias & Jonathan Shaw, 2013. "How taxes and welfare distort work incentives: static lifecycle and dynamic perspectives," IFS Working Papers W13/01, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    19. repec:esr:chaptr:jacb201240 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Abigail Mcknight & T. Tsang, 2013. "GINI Country Report: Growing Inequalities and their Impacts in the United Kingdom," GINI Country Reports united_kingdom, AIAS, Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies.
    21. Gerlinde Verbist & Francesco Figari, 2014. "The Redistributive Effect and Progressivity of Taxes Revisited: An International Comparison across the European Union," FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 70(3), pages 405-429, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_2013_num_459_1_10007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/estat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.