IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecstat/estat_0336-1454_2013_num_459_1_10007.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prélèvements et transferts aux ménages : des canaux redistributifs différents en 1990 et 2010

Author

Listed:
  • Alexis Eidelman
  • Fabrice Langumier
  • Augustin Vicard

Abstract

Pris dans leur ensemble, les prélèvements et prestations monétaires reposant sur les ménages ont-ils en 2010 un caractère progressif plus ou moins prononcé que vingt ans plus tôt ? Afin d'éclairer cette question, nous appliquons les législations socio-fiscales de 1990 et 2010 à un même échantillon représentatif des ménages français en 2010. Au total, le cœur du système de redistribution monétaire, l'impôt sur le revenu et les prestations, ont perdu en progressivité, tandis qu'en amont dans le processus de taxation, les prélèvements sociaux ont gagné en progressivité. L'impôt sur le revenu a vu son poids diminuer et est devenu nettement moins progressif, cette évolution étant très largement imputable à l'évolution de son barème, et plus marginalement à la multiplication des " niches fiscales ". Dans le même sens, les prestations sociales apparaissent moins redistributives qu'elles ne l'étaient en 1990. Elles ont été le plus souvent revalorisées selon l'inflation, et ont donc évolué moins vite que les revenus moyens de la population, ce qui a affecté leur capacité à réduire les inégalités. À l'inverse, le financement de la protection sociale a été profondément remanié, et ces changements ont joué en faveur de la progressivité. Des contributions (CSG et CRDS), assises sur l'ensemble des revenus, ont été substituées aux cotisations, assises uniquement sur les revenus du travail. Les exonérations de cotisations sociales sur les bas salaires ont également été progressivement renforcées. Selon les hypothèses retenues dans les quatre scénarios élaborés dans cet article, la progressivité d'ensemble du système socio-fiscal n'aurait pas connu d'inflexion majeure entre 1990 et 2010. Toutefois, l'analyse présentée ici ne tient compte ni des prélèvements sur le patrimoine, ni des prélèvements pesant sur les entreprises, alors que leur évolution pourrait avoir davantage affecté les ménages ayant de hauts revenus.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Alexis Eidelman & Fabrice Langumier & Augustin Vicard, 2013. "Prélèvements et transferts aux ménages : des canaux redistributifs différents en 1990 et 2010," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 459(1), pages 5-26.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_2013_num_459_1_10007
    DOI: 10.3406/estat.2013.10007
    Note: DOI:10.3406/estat.2013.10007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/estat.2013.10007
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/estat_0336-1454_2013_num_459_1_10007
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/estat.2013.10007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bengtsson, Niklas & Holmlund, Bertil & Waldenström, Daniel, 2012. "Lifetime versus Annual Tax Progressivity: Sweden, 1968–2009," IZA Discussion Papers 6641, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    2. Anne Laferrère & David le Blanc, 2002. "Comment les aides au logement affectent-elles les loyers ?," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 351(1), pages 3-30.
    3. Olivier Bargain, 2010. "Back to the future - decomposition analysis of distributive policies using behavioural simulations," Working Papers 201032, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Piketty, Thomas & Bozio, Antoine & Garbinti, Bertrand & Goupille-Lebret, Jonathan & Guillot, Malka, 2020. "Predistribution vs. Redistribution: Evidence from France and the U.S," CEPR Discussion Papers 15415, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leszek Morawski & Aneta Semeniuk, 2013. "Zakres ubóstwa a reformy podatkowo-świadczeniowe w latach 2006-2010," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 4, pages 21-40.
    2. C. Grislain-Letrémy & C. Trevien, 2014. "The Impact of Housing Subsidies on the Rental Sector: the French Example," Documents de Travail de l'Insee - INSEE Working Papers g2014-08, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques.
    3. Peter H. Lindert, 2017. "The Rise and Future of Progressive Redistribution," Commitment to Equity (CEQ) Working Paper Series 73, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
    4. Pierre Madec, 2015. "Faut il réformer les aides personnelles au logement ?," Post-Print hal-01296718, HAL.
    5. Boschini, Anne & Gunnarsson, Kristin & Roine, Jesper, 2017. "Women in Top Incomes: Evidence from Sweden 1974–2013," IZA Discussion Papers 10979, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Benjamin Ching & Chelsey Reid & Luke Symes, 2023. "Tax and Transfer Progressivity in New Zealand: Part 2 Results," Treasury Analytical Notes Series an23/03, New Zealand Treasury.
    7. Pierre Madec, 2015. "Quelle est l'efficacité des aides publiques au logement ?," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03571234, HAL.
    8. Roberto Impicciatore, 2015. "The Transition to Adulthood of the Italian Second Generation in France," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 31(5), pages 529-560, December.
    9. John Creedy, 2013. "Alternative Distributions for Inequality and Poverty Comparisons," Treasury Working Paper Series 13/11, New Zealand Treasury.
    10. Sara Torregrosa Hetland, 2015. "Did democracy bring redistribution? Insights from the Spanish tax system, 1960–90," European Review of Economic History, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(3), pages 294-315.
    11. Pierre Madec, 2015. "Faut il réformer les aides personnelles au logement ?," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01296718, HAL.
    12. Pierre Madec, 2015. "Quelle est l'efficacité des aides publiques au logement ?," Post-Print hal-03571234, HAL.
    13. Gabrielle Fack, 2005. "Pourquoi les ménages pauvres paient-ils des loyers de plus en plus élevés ? [L’incidence des aides au logement en France (1973-2002)]," Économie et Statistique, Programme National Persée, vol. 381(1), pages 17-40.
    14. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/56mtglm77d8qdorqfd0ckr23no is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Gintare Mazeikaite & Cathal O’Donoghue & Denisa M. Sologon, 2019. "The Great Recession, financial strain and self-assessed health in Ireland," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(4), pages 579-596, June.
    16. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/591sffhtvh8r9rq9u9e773li0i is not listed on IDEAS
    17. John Creedy & Nicolas Hérault†, 2011. "Decomposing Inequality and Social Welfare Changes : The Use of Alternative Welfare Metrics," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 1121, The University of Melbourne.
    18. John Creedy, 2013. "Alternative Distributions for Inequality and Poverty Comparisons," Treasury Working Paper Series 13/11, New Zealand Treasury.
    19. Mike Brewer & Monica Costa Dias & Jonathan Shaw, 2012. "Lifetime inequality and redistribution," IFS Working Papers W12/23, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    20. Fack, Gabrielle, 2005. "Pourquoi les ménages pauvres paient-ils des loyers de plus en plus élevés ?," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Docweb) 0516, CEPREMAP.
    21. Anne Laferrère & David le Blanc, 2004. "Gone with the Windfall: How Do Housing Allowances Affect Student Co-residence?," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 50(3), pages 451-477.
    22. Peter Levell & Barra Roantree & Jonathan Shaw, 2021. "Mobility and the lifetime distributional impact of tax and transfer reforms," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 28(4), pages 751-793, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecstat:estat_0336-1454_2013_num_459_1_10007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/estat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.