IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00533084.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Regulating the financial analysis industry : Is the European Directive effective ?

Author

Listed:
  • M. Dubois

    (Institut d'analyse financière - UNINE - Université de Neuchâtel = University of Neuchatel)

  • Pascal Dumontier

    (CERAG - Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion - UPMF - Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

In the recent years, the US and the EC have witnessed the adoption of new regulations focused on financial analysts. This study investigates whether the European regulations, known as the Market Abuse Directive (MAD) changed the distribution of recommendations and increased their credibility...

Suggested Citation

  • M. Dubois & Pascal Dumontier, 2009. "Regulating the financial analysis industry : Is the European Directive effective ?," Post-Print halshs-00533084, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00533084
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00533084v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-00533084v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patricia C. O'Brien & Maureen F. Mcnichols & Lin Hsiou‐Wei, 2005. "Analyst Impartiality and Investment Banking Relationships," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 623-650, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Régis BRETON & Sébastien GALANTI & Christophe HURLIN & Anne-Gaël VAUBOURG, 2011. "Does the firm-analyst relationship matter in explaining analysts' earnings forecast errors?," LEO Working Papers / DR LEO 469, Orleans Economics Laboratory / Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orleans (LEO), University of Orleans.
    2. Mola, Simona & Guidolin, Massimo, 2009. "Affiliated mutual funds and analyst optimism," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 108-137, July.
    3. Galanti, Sébastien & Vaubourg, Anne Gaël, 2017. "Optimism bias in financial analysts' earnings forecasts: Do commissions sharing agreements reduce conflicts of interest?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 325-337.
    4. Bing Wang & Kung‐Cheng Ho & Xinyu Liu & Yan Gu, 2022. "Industry cash flow volatility and stock price crash risk," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(2), pages 356-371, March.
    5. Gus De Franco & S.P. Kothari & Rodrigo S. Verdi, 2011. "The Benefits of Financial Statement Comparability," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(4), pages 895-931, September.
    6. Chen, Lei & Danbolt, Jo & Holland, John, 2018. "Information about bank intangibles, analyst information intermediation, and the role of knowledge and social forces in the ‘market for information’," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 261-276.
    7. Alexandra Popescu & Anne-Gaël Vaubourg, 2024. "Les analystes financiers et la vulnérabilité du secteur bancaire : état des lieux et perspectives de recherche," Post-Print hal-05007044, HAL.
    8. Sébastien GALANTI, 2008. "When the payment mode affects the quality of advices. Financial analysts, fund managers, and brokerage commissions," LEO Working Papers / DR LEO 1767, Orleans Economics Laboratory / Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orleans (LEO), University of Orleans.
    9. Yang, Yanhua Sunny & Yung, Chris, 2024. "Do analysts distribute negative opinions earlier?," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    10. Chang, Eric C. & Lin, Tse-Chun & Ma, Xiaorong, 2019. "Does short-selling threat discipline managers in mergers and acquisitions decisions?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1).
    11. Wang, Ying & Liu, Zisen, 2024. "Under the dome: Air pollution and analyst forecast optimism," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PA).
    12. Peter Clarkson & Alexander Nekrasov & Andreas Simon & Irene Tutticci, 2020. "Target price forecasts: The roles of the 52‐week high price and recent investor sentiment," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(9-10), pages 1365-1399, October.
    13. Christophe, Stephen E. & Ferri, Michael G. & Hsieh, Jim, 2010. "Informed trading before analyst downgrades: Evidence from short sellers," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 85-106, January.
    14. Stefano Cassella & Benjamin Golez & Huseyin Gulen & Peter Kelly & Stefano Giglio, 2023. "Horizon Bias and the Term Structure of Equity Returns," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 36(3), pages 1253-1288.
    15. Chen, Tao & Harford, Jarrad & Lin, Chen, 2015. "Do analysts matter for governance? Evidence from natural experiments," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 383-410.
    16. Rees, Lynn & Sharp, Nathan Y. & Wong, Paul A., 2017. "Working on the weekend: Do analysts strategically time the release of their recommendation revisions?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 104-121.
    17. Sun, Qian & Cheng, Xiaoke & Gao, Shenghao & Yang, Mingjing, 2020. "Are SEO investors misled by analyst optimism bias? Evidence from investor bids in SEO auctions," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 90-104.
    18. Zhu, Lin & Chen, Qinyuan & Yang, Shengzhi & Yi, Zhihong, 2021. "The role of analysts in negative information production and disclosure: Evidence from short selling deregulation in an emerging market," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 391-406.
    19. Kong, Dongmin & Lin, Zhiyang & Wang, Yanan & Xiang, Junyi, 2021. "Natural disasters and analysts' earnings forecasts," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    20. Huai-Chun Lo & Chia-Ying Chan, 2023. "Mean reverting in stock ratings distribution," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 1065-1097, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00533084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.