IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-00140167.html

Coordinating cross-border congestion management through auctions: an experimental approach of European solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Stéphane Robin

    (GATE - Groupe d'analyse et de théorie économique - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - ENS LSH - Ecole Normale Supérieure-Lettres et Sciences Humaines - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Céline Jullien

    (GAEL - Laboratoire d'Economie Appliquée = Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory - UPMF - Université Pierre Mendès France - Grenoble 2 - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique)

  • Carine Staropoli

    (ATOM - Analyse Théorique des Organisations et des Marchés - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne)

Abstract

The creation of an effective "European integrated competitive market" crucially depends on the waycross-border transactions are run. The full potential of the existing European interconnected grid is notrealized with administrative allocation rules whereas there is still no consensus on the efficiency ofalternative mechanisms based on auctions, which are the cornerstones of the newly created electricitymarkets. Our contribution aims at assessing two particular auction rules: the so-called implicit auctionalready applied in some markets and the coordinated explicit auction which is still a project and has never been dealt with analytically up to now. These allocation mechanisms call for further empirical investigations with more realistic assumptions than what has been done up to now. We use experimental methodology to identify and compare the effects of these two market institutions on the economic performances of the electric power market considering a structure configuration akin to thestructure present in the western European electricity sector. We examine the effects of the two auctionsmechanisms on the pattern of both energy prices and transmission prices, on the market efficiency and the surplus. For each institution, we assume a benevolent market operator that maximises the social surplus given the bids of the market participants. Laboratory experiments can be seen as acomplementary tool to analytical models to deal with electricity system complexity. Indeed in multi nodesnetworks, countervailing effects make an analytic analysis difficult. Our results emphasize the superiority in terms of efficiency of the implicit auction and highlight some of the problems encountered by the two rules in the lab. They show that even in a simple environment such as the one we have created in the lab to model the coordinated explicit auction, subjects are not able to anticipate what will happen in the energy market and as a consequence they do not take proper decision in thetransmission capacity market.

Suggested Citation

  • Stéphane Robin & Céline Jullien & Carine Staropoli, 2006. "Coordinating cross-border congestion management through auctions: an experimental approach of European solutions," Post-Print halshs-00140167, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00140167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Chinmoy, Lakshmi & Iniyan, S. & Goic, Ranko, 2019. "Modeling wind power investments, policies and social benefits for deregulated electricity market – A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 364-377.
    3. repec:dgr:rugsom:13003-eef is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Bailera, Manuel & Lisbona, Pilar, 2018. "Energy storage in Spain: Forecasting electricity excess and assessment of power-to-gas potential up to 2050," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 900-910.
    5. Richter, Jan & Viehmann, Johannes, 2014. "The value of information in explicit cross-border capacity auction regimes in electricity markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 74-84.
    6. Hagspiel, S. & Jägemann, C. & Lindenberger, D. & Brown, T. & Cherevatskiy, S. & Tröster, E., 2014. "Cost-optimal power system extension under flow-based market coupling," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 654-666.
    7. Simeon Hagspiel & Cosima Jägemann & Dietmar Lindenberger & Tom Brown & Stanislav Cherevatskiy & Eckehard Tröster, 2013. "Cost-Optimal Power System Extension under Flow-Based Market Coupling," EWI Working Papers 2013-9, Energiewirtschaftliches Institut an der Universitaet zu Koeln (EWI).
    8. Ádám Sleisz & Dániel Divényi & Beáta Polgári & Péter Sőrés & Dávid Raisz, 2022. "A Novel Cost Allocation Mechanism for Local Flexibility in the Power System with Partial Disintermediation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-18, November.
    9. Mulder, Machiel & Schoonbeek, Lambert, 2013. "Decomposing changes in competition in the Dutch electricity market through the residual supply index," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 100-107.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C92 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Group Behavior
    • D43 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection
    • D44 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Auctions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00140167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.