IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05235479.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Multi-Timescale Recurrent Neural Networks Beat Rough Volatility for Intraday Volatility Prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Damien Challet

    (MICS - Mathématiques et Informatique pour la Complexité et les Systèmes - CentraleSupélec - Université Paris-Saclay, FiQuant - Chaire de finance quantitative - MICS - Mathématiques et Informatique pour la Complexité et les Systèmes - CentraleSupélec - Université Paris-Saclay)

  • Vincent Ragel

    (MICS - Mathématiques et Informatique pour la Complexité et les Systèmes - CentraleSupélec - Université Paris-Saclay)

Abstract

We extend recurrent neural networks to include several flexible timescales for each dimension of their output, which mechanically improves their abilities to account for processes with long memory or highly disparate timescales. We compare the ability of vanilla and extended long short-term memory networks (LSTMs) to predict the intraday volatility of a collection of equity indices known to have a long memory. Generally, the number of epochs needed to train the extended LSTMs is divided by about two, while the variation in validation and test losses among models with the same hyperparameters is much smaller. We also show that the single model with the smallest validation loss systemically outperforms rough volatility predictions for the average intraday volatility of equity indices by about 20% when trained and tested on a dataset with multiple time series.

Suggested Citation

  • Damien Challet & Vincent Ragel, 2024. "Multi-Timescale Recurrent Neural Networks Beat Rough Volatility for Intraday Volatility Prediction," Post-Print hal-05235479, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05235479
    DOI: 10.3390/risks12060084
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05235479v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05235479v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3390/risks12060084?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05235479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.