IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05068599.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Understanding the influence of online grocery shopping on consumers' choice of products and dietary balance: a qualitative study in France

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Droulers

    (CREM - Centre de recherche en économie et management - UNICAEN - Université de Caen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - UR - Université de Rennes - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

  • Sophie Lacoste-Badie

    (LUMEN - Lille University Management Lab - ULR 4999 - Université de Lille)

Abstract

Objective: To explore the impact of online food shopping in France on the selection of products purchased and its potential impact on shoppers' dietary balance. Design: A qualitative study involving in-depth semi-structured individual interviews. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed through a reflexive thematic analysis approach. Setting: France. Participants: Thirty-four male and female respondents aged between 21 and 61 years old, residing in various regions of France, including urban, suburban and rural areas, with diverse profiles in terms of gender, age, location and number of children under 18. Results: Five key themes were identified as influencing decision-making with regard to the products purchased, namely 'less choice, especially for fresh produce', 'sense of security in buying the same products', 'convenience of online shopping through time-saving and product recommendation lists', 'avoiding unplanned purchases' and 'less fresh produce purchased, sometimes replaced by more processed items'. In turn, all of these factors potentially have an impact on the diet of online shoppers. Conclusions: With grocery e-commerce penetration expected to double in the next 5 years, the study underscores the consequences of online shopping on consumers' dietary balance. The findings have practical implications for online food retailers, inciting them to develop solutions that would encourage e-grocery shoppers to buy more fresh produce and sample a more varied diet. Additionally, they highlight the importance of monitoring the influence of technology on the consumer buying process, particularly with regard to food.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Droulers & Sophie Lacoste-Badie, 2025. "Understanding the influence of online grocery shopping on consumers' choice of products and dietary balance: a qualitative study in France," Post-Print hal-05068599, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05068599
    DOI: 10.1017/s1368980025000266
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-05068599v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-05068599v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1017/s1368980025000266?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harris-Lagoudakis, Katherine, 2023. "The effect of online shopping channels on brand choice, product exploration and price elasticities," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    2. Yang Yu & Edward C. Jaenicke, 2020. "Estimating Food Waste as Household Production Inefficiency," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(2), pages 525-547, March.
    3. Yu, Junwei & Droulers, Olivier & Lacoste-Badie, Sophie, 2022. "Why display motion on packaging? The effect of implied motion on consumer behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    4. repec:hal:journl:hal-03512772 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Hansen, Torben & Møller Jensen, Jan & Stubbe Solgaard, Hans, 2004. "Predicting online grocery buying intention: a comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 539-550.
    6. Driediger, Fabian & Bhatiasevi, Veera, 2019. "Online grocery shopping in Thailand: Consumer acceptance and usage behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 224-237.
    7. Katherine Harris‐Lagoudakis, 2022. "Online shopping and the healthfulness of grocery purchases," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(3), pages 1050-1076, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sabakun Naher Shetu, 2025. "Determinants of generation Z consumers’ mobile online shopping apps continuance intention to use during COVID-19 and beyond—an empirical study," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Arvind Shroff & Satish Kumar & Luisa M. Martinez & Nitesh Pandey, 2024. "From clicks to consequences: a multi-method review of online grocery shopping," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 925-964, June.
    3. Yusuf Arslan & Aykut Hamit Turan, 2022. "Consumers' Acceptance of Online Grocery Shopping in a Pandemic Situation: An Extended Technology Acceptance Model Perspective," European Journal of Business Science and Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics, vol. 8(2), pages 143-158.
    4. Van Droogenbroeck, Ellen & Van Hove, Leo, 2020. "Intra-household task allocation in online grocery shopping: Together alone," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    5. Narwal, Preeti & Rai, Shivam, 2022. "Individual differences and moral disengagement in Pay-What-You-Want pricing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 528-547.
    6. Rodríguez-López, María Eugenia & Higueras-Castillo, Elena & Rojas-Lamorena, Álvaro J. & Alcántara-Pilar, Juan Miguel, 2024. "The future of TV-shopping: predicting user purchase intention through an extended technology acceptance model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    7. Maria Rodrigues & João F. Proença & Rita Macedo, 2023. "Determinants of the Purchase of Secondhand Products: An Approach by the Theory of Planned Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Tan, Fuqiang & Li, Xi & Agarwal, Reeti & Joshi, Yatish & Yaqub, Muhammad Zafar, 2024. "Does multilingual packaging influence purchasing in retail segment? Evidence from multiple experiments," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    9. Dey, Bikash Koli & Sarkar, Mitali & Chaudhuri, Kripasindhu & Sarkar, Biswajit, 2023. "Do you think that the home delivery is good for retailing?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    10. Tung-Lai Hu & Chuang-Min Chao & Wen-Kai Hsieh & Chia-Hung Lin, 2025. "The Impact Mechanism of Video Maturity and Content Empowerment on Purchase Intentions: A Case Study of Agricultural Tourism in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-26, April.
    11. Yang Yu & Edward C. Jaenicke, 2021. "“Progress and Challenges in Empirical Food Waste Research” – Authors' Response to Comment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(1), pages 26-29, January.
    12. Wang, Hui-Chih & Doong, Her-Sen, 2010. "Argument form and spokesperson type: The recommendation strategy of virtual salespersons," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 493-501.
    13. Rizzi, Francesco & Gigliotti, Marina & Runfola, Andrea & Ferrucci, Luca, 2022. "Don't miss the boat when consumers are in-store! Exploring the use of point-of-purchase displays to promote green and non-green products," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    14. Philipp Brüggemann & Koen Pauwels, 2025. "How attitudes and purchases differ between also-online versus offline-only grocery shoppers in online and offline grocery shopping," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 1973-2009, June.
    15. Maria Csutora & Gabor Harangozo & Cecilia Szigeti, 2022. "Factors behind the Consumer Acceptance of Sustainable Business Models in Pandemic Times," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, August.
    16. Brian E. Roe, 2021. "Progress and Challenges in Empirical Food Waste Research: A Commentary on “Estimating Food Waste as Household Production Inefficiency,” and “Household Food Waste and Inefficiencies in Food Production”," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(1), pages 22-25, January.
    17. Khalek, Sk Abu & Dey, Debasmita & Chakraborty, Anirban & Samanta, Tamal, 2025. "“From expectations to frustrations†: Dissecting negative experiences to understand negative word-of-mouth in online grocery services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    18. Philipp Brüggemann & Luis F. Martinez & Koen Pauwels, 2025. "Theoretical perspectives and conceptual framework for online grocery shopping: Adapting to environmental circumstances and influencing internal factors," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 2271-2307, June.
    19. Luo, Na & Olsen, Tava & Liu, Yanping & Zhang, Abraham, 2022. "Reducing food loss and waste in supply chain operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    20. Daniel Francisco Pais & António Cardoso Marques & José Alberto Fuinhas, 2022. "The cost of healthier and more sustainable food choices: Do plant-based consumers spend more on food?," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05068599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.