IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04820341.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Effets et enjeux de l'émergence d'une communauté de pratique au sein d'une méta-organisation du secteur sanitaire, social et médico-social

Author

Listed:
  • Brigitte Charles-Pauvers

    (LEMNA - Laboratoire d'économie et de management de Nantes Atlantique - Nantes Univ - IAE Nantes - Nantes Université - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Nantes - Nantes Université - pôle Sociétés - Nantes Univ - Nantes Université)

  • Amélie Renard

    (LEMNA - Laboratoire d'économie et de management de Nantes Atlantique - Nantes Univ - IAE Nantes - Nantes Université - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Nantes - Nantes Université - pôle Sociétés - Nantes Univ - Nantes Université)

Abstract

Depuis plusieurs années, les métiers du soin et de l'accompagnement souffrent d'un déficit majeur d'attractivité, renforcé depuis la pandémie. Le secteur associatif des Etablissements et Services Sanitaires, Sociaux et Médico-Sociaux français n'est pas épargné. Or, si les lacunes des politiques et pratiques de ressources humaines sont largement soulignées, les causes organisationnelles et managériales sont encore souvent occultées (Payre et al., 2021).Face à ce défi, les communautés de pratique (COP) -des groupes de personnes aux intérêts ou pratiques communes, se réunissant régulièrement pour partager leurs expériences et monter en compétences -se multiplient, afin de faciliter innovations et apprentissages collectifs (Wenger, 1998; Rampa & Agogué, 2020).En septembre 2023, l' URIOPSS PDL (Union Régionale Interfédérale des Organismes Privés Sanitaires et Sociaux des Pays de la Loire), une méta-organisation -organisation composée d'autres organisations (Ahrne & Brunsson, 2005, 2008) -a mis en place une COP, destinée à répondre aux enjeux d'attractivité vécus par ses adhérents, des structures non-lucratives couvrant tous les âges de la vie (centre maternel, aide sociale à l'enfance, service infirmier à domicile, maison de retraite …). Ce groupe, composé d'une dizaine d'associations et animé conjointement par une salariée de l'URIOPSS et une chercheure, se rencontre tous les deux mois pour partager savoirs expérientiels et scientifiques.La majorité des recherches sur les communautés de pratique s'est principalement déployée dans des cadres intra-organisationnels, au sein de grandes entreprises (Brown & Duguid, 1991). Une observationparticipante, menée à l'URIOPSS PDL depuis septembre 2020, permet d'analyser les enjeux et effets de la mise en place d'une COP au sein d'une méta-organisation.Les résultats mettent en évidence des effets vertueux, la transférabilité de ses bénéfices, en particulier l'enjeu de la compétence collective pour la méta-organisation. Mais ils soulèvent aussi de nombreux questionnements (pérennisation, rôle du pilote, création de relations de proximité).

Suggested Citation

  • Brigitte Charles-Pauvers & Amélie Renard, 2024. "Effets et enjeux de l'émergence d'une communauté de pratique au sein d'une méta-organisation du secteur sanitaire, social et médico-social," Post-Print hal-04820341, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04820341
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04820341v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04820341v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Karine Goglio-Primard & Etienne Wenger-Trayner, 2020. "Les communautés de pratique vivent de la valeur qu’elles produisent !," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(2), pages 161-169.
    2. John Seely Brown & Paul Duguid, 1991. "Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 40-57, February.
    3. Hervé Dumez & Sandra Renou, 2020. "How Business Organizes Collectively: An Inquiry on Trade Associations and Other Meta-Organizations," Post-Print hal-03059754, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Duniesky Feitó Madrigal & Alejandro Mungaray Lagarda & Michelle Texis Flores, 2016. "Factors associated with learning management in Mexican micro-entrepreneurs," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, vol. 32(141), pages 381-386, December.
    2. Ankita Tandon & Unnikrishnan K. Nair, 2015. "Enactment of knowledge brokering: Agents, roles, processes and the impact of immersion," Working papers 183, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
    3. Emmanuelle Vaast & Geoff Walsham, 2009. "Trans-Situated Learning: Supporting a Network of Practice with an Information Infrastructure," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 547-564, December.
    4. Alvesson, Mats & Sveningsson, Stefan, 2011. "Management is the solution: Now what was the problem? On the fragile basis for managerialism," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 349-361.
    5. Dupouet, Olivier & Yildizoglu, Murat, 2006. "Organizational performance in hierarchies and communities of practice," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 668-690, December.
    6. Franke, Nikolaus & Shah, Sonali, 2003. "How communities support innovative activities: an exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 157-178, January.
    7. Frédéric CREPLET, 2004. "Les Portails d’entreprise : une réponse aux dimensions de l’entreprise « processeur de connaissances »," Working Papers of BETA 2004-07, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    8. Kun Pu & Wei Liu, 2023. "Is absorptive capacity the "panacea" for organizational development? A META analysis of absorptive capacity and firm performance from the perspective of constructivism," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(2), pages 1-24, February.
    9. Louie Rivers & Tamara Dempsey & Jade Mitchell & Carole Gibbs, 2015. "Environmental Regulation and Enforcement: Structures, Processes and the Use of Data for Fraud Detection," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(04), pages 1-29, December.
    10. Mohajan, Haradhan, 2016. "Sharing of Tacit Knowledge in Organizations: A Review," MPRA Paper 82958, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 15 Jun 2016.
    11. Xiao Zhang & Luqun Xie & Jiatao Li & Li Cheng, 2022. "“Outside in”: Global demand heterogeneity and dynamic capabilities of multinational enterprises," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(4), pages 709-722, June.
    12. Cristina Páez-Avilés & Esteve Juanola-Feliu & Islam Bogachan-Tahirbegi & Mónica Mir & Manel González-Piñero & Josep Samitier, 2015. "Innovation And Technology Transfer Of Medical Devices Fostered By Cross-Disciplinary Communities Of Practitioners," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(06), pages 1-27, December.
    13. Fioretti, Guido, 2009. "From men and machines to the organizational learning curve," MPRA Paper 19392, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Gyewan Moon & Suk Bong Choi & Shaikh Javed Fardin, 2016. "Organisational factors for effective knowledge sharing: an empirical study of Korean learning teams," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(1), pages 102-120.
    15. Maarten B.T. de Groot & Oli R. Mihalache & Tom Elfring, 2022. "Toward a Theory of Family Social Capital in Wealthy Transgenerational Enterprise Families," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(1), pages 159-192, January.
    16. Prencipe, Andrea & Tell, Fredrik, 2001. "Inter-project learning: processes and outcomes of knowledge codification in project-based firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(9), pages 1373-1394, December.
    17. Parjanen, Satu & Hyypiä, Mirva, 2019. "Innotin game supporting collective creativity in innovation activities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 26-34.
    18. Mike Bartholomaei, 2005. "To Know is to Be: Three Perspectives on the Codification of Knowledge," SPRU Working Paper Series 131, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    19. Clint Chadwick & Adina Dabu, 2009. "Human Resources, Human Resource Management, and the Competitive Advantage of Firms: Toward a More Comprehensive Model of Causal Linkages," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 253-272, February.
    20. Ali Nawab, 2020. "Perceptions of the Key Stakeholders on Professional Development of Teachers in Rural Pakistan," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04820341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.