IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04704651.html

Exploring the Influence of Non-Financial Reporting Practices and Double Materiality Adoption on ESG Ratings: Evidence from European Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Anis Shami

    (CERAG - Centre d'études et de recherches appliquées à la gestion - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

Abstract

Purpose -This paper examines how the adoption of non-financial reporting (NFR) standards and the double materiality (DM) principle affects external performance assessments, measured by ESG ratings. The study argues that reporting practices shape disclosure quality, transparency, and accountability in firms' business models.Design/methodology/approach -A three-year (2020-2022) longitudinal analysis of 366 European listed companies' annual reports was conducted. Descriptive statistics and ordinary least squares regressions were employed to analyze the association between reporting practices, DM adoption, and ESG ratings from several rating agencies. Findings -The findings show that several factors influence ESG ratings, including the adoption of non-financial reporting frameworks and the inclusion of a greater number of sustainability topics. Furthermore, companies that display previous ratings in their reports receive better future ESG ratings. However, the adoption of double materiality had no significant impact. Research implications -The study contributes to the business model literature by demonstrating how reporting practices and regulatory development build external representations of firms' value creation, delivery, and capture. It highlights the role of disclosure frameworks and double materiality as institutional forces with the capacity to transform business models to meet stakeholder and regulatory pressures.Originality/value -This study is one of the first longitudinal tests that empirically analyzes the impact of non-financial reporting frameworks and DM on ESG ratings, shedding new light on how they impact the evaluation of sustainable business models.

Suggested Citation

  • Anis Shami, 2024. "Exploring the Influence of Non-Financial Reporting Practices and Double Materiality Adoption on ESG Ratings: Evidence from European Companies," Post-Print hal-04704651, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04704651
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04704651v2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04704651v2/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emma Avetisyan & Michel Ferrary, 2013. "Dynamics of Stakeholders’ Implications in the Institutionalization of the CSR Field in France and in the United States," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(1), pages 115-133, June.
    2. Florian Berg & Julian F Kölbel & Roberto Rigobon, 2022. "Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings [Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: theory and empirical evidence]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 26(6), pages 1315-1344.
    3. Elaine Conway, 2019. "To Agree or Disagree? An Analysis of CSR Ratings Firms," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 152-177, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arianna Agosto & Paolo Giudici & Alessandra Tanda, 2023. "How to combine ESG scores? A proposal based on credit rating prediction," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 3222-3230, November.
    2. Jian Zhou & Xiaodong Lei & Jianglong Yu, 2024. "ESG rating divergence and corporate green innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 2911-2930, May.
    3. Arianna Agosto & Antonio Balzanella & Paola Cerchiello, 2025. "Aggregating ESG scores: a Wasserstein distance-based method," DEM Working Papers Series 228, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Management.
    4. Jongmoo Jay Choi & Hoje Jo & Jimi Kim & Moo Sung Kim, 2018. "Business Groups and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(4), pages 931-954, December.
    5. Oehler, Andreas & Neuss, Charlotte, 2025. "ESG disclosure vs. ESG ratings: Consistent information value?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    6. Spira, Robin, 2024. "How does ESG rating disagreement influence analyst forecast dispersion?," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 9(3), pages 1769-1804.
    7. Zhang, Jinlong & Qi, Fengyu & Wu, Mingyue, 2025. "Market-oriented environmental regulation and ESG rating divergence," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    8. Chang, Zhenghao & Zhou, Hang & Ruan, Mengyu & Li, Qin, 2025. "When major customers matter: customer concentration and ESG rating disagreement," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(3).
    9. van Weeren, Michelle & Bluntz, Clarence, 2025. "What makes a rating useable? Shifting epistemic practices in the ESG rating field," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    10. Scholz, Robert, 2023. "Unternehmensmitbestimmung und die sozialökologische Transformation: Zusammenhang zwischen Mitbestimmungsindex und ESG-Kriterien in börsennotierten Unternehmen," Mitbestimmungsreport 79, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    11. Galletta, Simona & Goodell, John W. & Mazzù, Sebastiano & Paltrinieri, Andrea, 2025. "The impact of environmental disclosure and controversies on bank value," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 134.
    12. Kang, Grace Il-Joo & Yoo, G-Song, 2025. "Analysts' vs. investors' optimism bias in legal and normative CSR," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    13. Van Ha Nguyen & Thu Thi Ha Dinh & Ngoc Ha Tran & Nam Hoang Vu, 2026. "Green innovation and stock liquidity: empirical evidence from global energy firms," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, March.
    14. Ferriani, Fabrizio, 2023. "Issuing bonds during the Covid-19 pandemic: Was there an ESG premium?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    15. Tim Heubeck & Annina Ahrens, 2025. "Governing the Responsible Investment of Slack Resources in Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance: How Beneficial are CSR Committees?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 198(2), pages 365-385, May.
    16. Cauthorn, Thomas & Dumrose, Maurice & Eckert, Julia & Klein, Christian & Zwergel, Bernhard, 2023. "Rating changes revisited: New evidence on short-term ESG momentum," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    17. Danisman, Gamze Ozturk & Tarazi, Amine, 2024. "ESG activity and bank lending during financial crises," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    18. Liu, Xiangqiang & Yang, Qingqing & Wei, Kai & Dai, Peng-Fei, 2024. "ESG rating disagreement and idiosyncratic return volatility: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PB).
    19. Dunbar, Kwamie & Treku, Daniel & Sarnie, Robert & Hoover, Jack, 2023. "What does ESG risk premia tell us about mutual fund sustainability levels: A difference-in-differences analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    20. Sirin, Selahattin Murat & Yilmaz, Berna N., 2025. "Tech firms and the renewable energy sector: Exploring the moderating effects of institutional ownership on financial connectedness," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04704651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.