IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04704567.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Testing of "Truth" As a Modality of Trust in Global Performance Measurement
[La mise à l’épreuve de la « vérité » dans la mesure de la performance globale des entreprises]

Author

Listed:
  • Frédéric Distler

    (CEREFIGE - Centre Européen de Recherche en Economie Financière et Gestion des Entreprises - UL - Université de Lorraine)

Abstract

This article apprehends the global performance of companies through the publication of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in management reports. Regulations have evolved since 2017 by replacing the former CSR report with a statement of extra-financial performance, by setting thresholds that exempt companies from this reporting obligation, and by requiring more detail and transparency from companies that choose to disclose social and environmental information on a voluntary basis. We studied the case of three Listed Real Estate Investment Companies (SIICs) that have always published CSR reports or appendices in their management reports and have ceased to do so since this change in regulations. This abstention therefore raises questions about the sincerity of this approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Frédéric Distler, 2024. "The Testing of "Truth" As a Modality of Trust in Global Performance Measurement [La mise à l’épreuve de la « vérité » dans la mesure de la performance globale des entreprises]," Post-Print hal-04704567, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04704567
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-04704567v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-04704567v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmed Belkaoui & Philip G. Karpik, 1989. "Determinants of the Corporate Decision to Disclose Social Information," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 2(1), pages 1-1, April.
    2. Kevin C. H. Chiang & Gregory J. Wachtel & Xiyu Zhou, 2019. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Growth Opportunity: The Case of Real Estate Investment Trusts," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 463-478, March.
    3. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513579610116358 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Paul R. Milgrom, 1981. "Good News and Bad News: Representation Theorems and Applications," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 12(2), pages 380-391, Autumn.
    5. Dye, Ra, 1985. "Disclosure Of Nonproprietary Information," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(1), pages 123-145.
    6. Bernard Pras & Philippe Zarlowski, 2013. "Obligation de rendre des comptes. Enjeux de légitimité et d'efficacité," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 0(8), pages 13-32.
    7. Françoise Quairel, 2004. "Responsable mais pas comptable : analyse de la normalisation des rapports environnementaux et sociaux," Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 10(1), pages 7-36.
    8. Noel Brown & Craig Deegan, 1998. "The public disclosure of environmental performance information—a dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 21-41.
    9. Bernard Pras & Philippe Zarlowski, 2013. "Obligation de rendre des comptes : enjeux de légitimité et d’efficacité," Post-Print hal-01638817, HAL.
    10. Françoise Quairel, 2004. "Responsable mais pas comptable : analyse de la normalisation des rapports environnementaux et sociaux," ACCRA, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 10(1), pages 7-36.
    11. Craig Deegan & Michaela Rankin, 1996. "Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively?," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 9(2), pages 50-67, May.
    12. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513578910132240 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shuo Liu & Dimitri Migrow, 2019. "Designing organizations in volatile markets," ECON - Working Papers 319, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    2. Xiao-Jun Zhang, 2012. "Information relevance, reliability and disclosure," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 189-226, March.
    3. Gabriele Gratton & Richard Holden & Anton Kolotilin, 2015. "Timing Information Flows," Discussion Papers 2015-16, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    4. Paugam, Luc, 2011. "Valorisation et reporting du goodwill : enjeux théoriques et empiriques," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/8007 edited by Casta, Jean-François.
    5. Ali, Ashiq & Klasa, Sandy & Yeung, Eric, 2014. "Industry concentration and corporate disclosure policy," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 240-264.
    6. S. Nageeb Ali & Andreas Kleiner & Kun Zhang, 2024. "From Design to Disclosure," Papers 2411.03608, arXiv.org.
    7. Yan Li & Yutao Li, 2020. "The effect of trade secrets protection on disclosure of forward‐looking financial information," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3-4), pages 397-437, March.
    8. Emeric Henry, 2009. "Strategic Disclosure of Research Results: The Cost of Proving Your Honesty," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(539), pages 1036-1064, July.
    9. Winand Emons & Claude Fluet, 2019. "Strategic communication with reporting costs," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 87(3), pages 341-363, October.
    10. E. Cheynel & M. Liu-Watts, 2020. "A simple structural estimator of disclosure costs," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 201-245, March.
    11. Amel Ben Rhouma & Walid Ben Amar & Eustache Ebondo Wa Mandzila, 2014. "Quel Impact Des Mécanismes De Gouvernance Sur La Divulgation Des Risques Liés Au Changement Climatique ? Le Cas Des Entreprises Françaises Cotées," Post-Print hal-01899578, HAL.
    12. Daniel, Kent & Hirshleifer, David & Teoh, Siew Hong, 2002. "Investor psychology in capital markets: evidence and policy implications," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 139-209, January.
    13. Renato Camodeca & Alex Almici & Umberto Sagliaschi, 2018. "Sustainability Disclosure in Integrated Reporting: Does It Matter to Investors? A Cheap Talk Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-34, November.
    14. Joost Impink & Martien Lubberink & Bart Praag & David Veenman, 2012. "Did accelerated filing requirements and SOX Section 404 affect the timeliness of 10-K filings?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 227-253, June.
    15. Zabihollah Rezaee & Ling Tuo, 2019. "Are the Quantity and Quality of Sustainability Disclosures Associated with the Innate and Discretionary Earnings Quality?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(3), pages 763-786, March.
    16. Xi Li, 2010. "The impacts of product market competition on the quantity and quality of voluntary disclosures," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 663-711, September.
    17. Frenkel, Sivan & Guttman, Ilan & Kremer, Ilan, 2020. "The effect of exogenous information on voluntary disclosure and market quality," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 176-192.
    18. Ackert, Lucy F. & Church, Bryan K. & Sankar, Mandira Roy, 2000. "Voluntary disclosure under imperfect competition: experimental evidence," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 81-105, January.
    19. Alfred Wagenhofer, 2000. "Disclosure of proprietary information in the course of an acquisition," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 57-69.
    20. Florian Hoffmann & Roman Inderst & Marco Ottaviani, 2020. "Persuasion Through Selective Disclosure: Implications for Marketing, Campaigning, and Privacy Regulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(11), pages 4958-4979, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04704567. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.