IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04234521.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La stratégie collective vue par les relations entre acteurs : le couple coopération-coordination

Author

Listed:
  • Stéphanie Loup

    (LGCO - Laboratoire Gouvernance et Contrôle Organisationnel - UT3 - Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier - UT - Université de Toulouse)

  • Christophe Leyronas

    (TBS - Toulouse Business School)

Abstract

De nombreux travaux présentent la participation à des collectifs comme une des alternatives au développement des petites entreprises. Or, dans certains cas (comme celui que nous nous proposons d'étudier ici), si un certain nombre de conditions (proximité, identité, externalités positives avec les parties prenantes) sont réunis la stratégie collective a néanmoins beaucoup de mal à se développer. Il s'agit alors de comprendre la dynamique de la stratégie collective en prenant en compte le réseau des relations entre les acteurs. L'analyse du contenu des relations entre les acteurs permet de mettre en évidence leur impact sur la dynamique collective: Dans quelle mesure la structure et la nature des relations entre acteurs permet-elle de comprendre la dynamique de leur stratégie collective ? Notre proposition de recherche repose sur l'analyse du contenu des relations en distinguant les relations de coordination et celles de coopération. Le contenu, apprécié au travers de ce rapport coopération/ coordination, donne une lecture différente du développement des actions collectives. Seule la coopération permettrait la création de nouvelles ressources (ressources collectives ou non) ; la coordination se contentant de répondre aux besoins des clients ou du marché mais sans création, échange ou appropriation de ressources par d‟autres. La prééminence de liens de coordination limite le développement de nouvelles ressources ou compétences et se révèle être un frein au collectif. Cette recherche introduit dans l'analyse des relations de coopération, dans les stratégies collectives la nécessité pour en comprendre certaines dynamiques d'entre dans le détail du contenu des relations entre acteurs. Elle s'appuie pour cela sur l'analyse en profondeur d'un cas.

Suggested Citation

  • Stéphanie Loup & Christophe Leyronas, 2015. "La stratégie collective vue par les relations entre acteurs : le couple coopération-coordination," Post-Print hal-04234521, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04234521
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://ut3-toulouseinp.hal.science/hal-04234521
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ut3-toulouseinp.hal.science/hal-04234521/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gautam Ahuja, 2000. "The duality of collaboration: inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 317-343, March.
    2. L. J. Bourgeois, 1980. "Performance and consensus," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(3), pages 227-248, July.
    3. John Hagedoorn, 1993. "Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(5), pages 371-385, July.
    4. Christian Lechner & Christophe Leyronas, 2012. "The competitive advantage of cluster firms: the priority of regional network position over extra-regional networks -- a study of a French high-tech cluster," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(5-6), pages 457-473, June.
    5. Saïd Yami, 2006. "Fondements et perspectives des stratégies collectives," Revue française de gestion, Lavoisier, vol. 167(8), pages 91-104.
    6. Ranjay Gulati & Nitin Nohria & Akbar Zaheer, 2000. "Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue: strategic networks," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(3), pages 199-201, March.
    7. Akbar Zaheer & Geoffrey G. Bell, 2005. "Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(9), pages 809-825, September.
    8. Richard Makadok, 2003. "Doing the right thing and knowing the right thing to do: why the whole is greater than the sum of the parts," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(10), pages 1043-1055, October.
    9. Gary Hamel, 1991. "Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(S1), pages 83-103, June.
    10. Nitin Nohria & Carlos Garcia‐Pont, 1991. "Global strategic linkages and industry structure," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(S1), pages 105-124, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gilsing, Victor & Nooteboom, Bart & Vanhaverbeke, Wim & Duysters, Geert & van den Oord, Ad, 2008. "Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 1717-1731, December.
    2. Nooteboom, Bart & Van Haverbeke, Wim & Duysters, Geert & Gilsing, Victor & van den Oord, Ad, 2007. "Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 1016-1034, September.
    3. Olga A. Novoselova, 2022. "What matters for interorganizational connectedness? Locating the drivers of multiplex corporate networks," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 872-899, April.
    4. Stienstra, Miranda, 2020. "The determinants and performance implications of alliance partner acquisition," Other publications TiSEM 7fdee0c2-d4d2-4f5b-95e3-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Wilfried Zidorn & Marcus Wagner, 2012. "Too Much of a Good Thing: The Role of Alliance Portfolio Diversity for Innovation Output in the Biotechnology Industry," DRUID Working Papers 12-10, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    6. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Hottenrott, Hanna, 2012. "Collaborative R&D as a strategy to attenuate financing constraints," ZEW Discussion Papers 12-049, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    7. Vanhaverbeke, W.P.M. & Beerkens, B.E. & Duysters, G.M., 2003. "Explorative and exploitative learning strategies in technology-based alliance networks," Working Papers 03.22, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies.
    8. Walter, Jorge & Lechner, Christoph & Kellermanns, Franz W., 2007. "Knowledge transfer between and within alliance partners: Private versus collective benefits of social capital," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(7), pages 698-710, July.
    9. Pinar Ozcan, 2018. "Growing with the market: How changing conditions during market growth affect formation and evolution of interfirm ties," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 295-328, February.
    10. Casanueva, Cristóbal & Gallego, Ángeles & Sancho, María, 2013. "Network resources and social capital in airline alliance portfolios," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 441-453.
    11. Wagner, Stefan & Goossen, Martin C., 2018. "Knowing me, knowing you: inventor mobility and the formation of technology-oriented alliances," IRTG 1792 Discussion Papers 2018-007, Humboldt University of Berlin, International Research Training Group 1792 "High Dimensional Nonstationary Time Series".
    12. Haeussler, Carolin & Patzelt, Holger & Zahra, Shaker A., 2012. "Strategic alliances and product development in high technology new firms: The moderating effect of technological capabilities," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 217-233.
    13. Casanueva, Cristóbal & Castro, Ignacio & Galán, José L., 2013. "Informational networks and innovation in mature industrial clusters," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(5), pages 603-613.
    14. Marcus Wagner & Wilfried Zidorn, 2017. "Effects of extent and diversity of alliancing on innovation: the moderating role of firm newness," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 919-936, December.
    15. Park, Gunno & Kim, Marco JinHwan & Kang, Jina, 2015. "Competitive embeddedness: The impact of competitive relations among a firm's current alliance partners on its new alliance formations," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 196-208.
    16. Rothaermel, Frank T. & Deeds, David L., 2006. "Alliance type, alliance experience and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 429-460, July.
    17. Lokshin, Boris & Hagedoorn, John & Letterie, Wilko, 2011. "The bumpy road of technology partnerships: Understanding causes and consequences of partnership mal-functioning," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 297-308, March.
    18. Duysters, Geert & Lemmens, Charmianne & Letterie, Wilko & Vanhaverbeke, Wim, 2008. "The Innovative Performance of Alliance Block Members: Evidence from the Microelectronics Industry," MERIT Working Papers 2008-064, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    19. M. Moore, 2021. "Collaboration in Coworking Spaces: Impact on Firm Innovativeness and Business Models," Papers 2111.09866, arXiv.org.
    20. Elio Shijaku & Martin Larraza-Kintana & Ainhoa Urtasun-Alonso, 2020. "Network centrality and organizational aspirations: A behavioral interaction in the context of international strategic alliances," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 51(5), pages 813-828, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04234521. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.