IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04165613.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Favoriser l’innovation par le lean product development : le comportement humain, un indicateur pertinent ?

Author

Listed:
  • Maéva Jaffré

    (G-SCOP_CCI - Conception Collaborative et Intégrée - G-SCOP - Laboratoire des sciences pour la conception, l'optimisation et la production - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

  • Eric Blanco

    (CReA - Centre de Recherche de l'École de l'air - Armée de l'air et de l'espace)

  • Pierre Chévrier

    (G-SCOP_CC - Conception collaborative - G-SCOP - Laboratoire des sciences pour la conception, l'optimisation et la production - UJF - Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble 1 - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - INPG - Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, G-SCOP_CCI - Conception Collaborative et Intégrée - G-SCOP - Laboratoire des sciences pour la conception, l'optimisation et la production - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

  • Bernard Penz

    (G-SCOP - Laboratoire des sciences pour la conception, l'optimisation et la production - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes, G-SCOP_GROG - Groupe Recherche Opérationnelle de Grenoble - G-SCOP - Laboratoire des sciences pour la conception, l'optimisation et la production - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes - Grenoble INP - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble - Grenoble Institute of Technology - UGA - Université Grenoble Alpes)

Abstract

The links between lean product development (LPD) and performance, particularly innovation, vary depending on the company. This raises the question of the parameters influencing the results of the LPD. The issue of LPD and innovation is often analyzed from a "tool" point of view. The actors and their own logics are topics not covered. In this study we ask the question of the importance of human behavior in the success of the LPD to promote innovation. We also wonder how to measure this parameter. To answer this question, we carried out a field study in a technological R&D of semiconductors and did a triangulation of the data collected there. This study allowed us to observe that factually some levers of lean related to innovation were less implemented than others. However, when we examine the field, the human dimension systematically emerges as a factor fostering innovation. This showed us the importance and predominance of human behavior in innovation in this company. Subsequently, we propose a first way of classifying the qualities of behavior conducive to innovation. From this qualification comes a proposal for behavioral indicators, KBIs.

Suggested Citation

  • Maéva Jaffré & Eric Blanco & Pierre Chévrier & Bernard Penz, 2023. "Favoriser l’innovation par le lean product development : le comportement humain, un indicateur pertinent ?," Post-Print hal-04165613, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04165613
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-04165613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-04165613/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sanjay Bhasin, 2012. "Prominent obstacles to lean," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 61(4), pages 403-425, April.
    2. Guilherme Luz Tortorella & Giuliano Almeida Marodin & Diego de Castro Fettermann & Flavio Sanson Fogliatto, 2016. "Relationships between lean product development enablers and problems," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(10), pages 2837-2855, May.
    3. Kull, Thomas J. & Yan, Tingting & Liu, Zhongzhi & Wacker, John G., 2014. "The moderation of lean manufacturing effectiveness by dimensions of national culture: Testing practice-culture congruence hypotheses," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1-12.
    4. Sanjay Bhasin, 2012. "Prominent obstacles to lean," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 61(4), pages 403-425, April.
    5. Promporn Wangwacharakul & Martina Berglund & Ulrika Harlin & Per Gullander, 2014. "Cultural Aspects when Implementing Lean Production and Lean Product Development – Experiences from a Swedish Perspective," Quality Innovation Prosperity, Technical University of Košice, Department of integrated management, vol. 18(1).
    6. Craig Standing & Denise Jackson & Ann-Claire Larsen & Yuliani Suseno & Richard Fulford & Denise Gengatharen, 2016. "Enhancing individual innovation in organisations: a review of the literature," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(1), pages 44-62.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tortorella, Guilherme Luz & Miorando, Rogério & Marodin, Giuliano, 2017. "Lean supply chain management: Empirical research on practices, contexts and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 98-112.
    2. Bortolotti, Thomas & Boscari, Stefania & Danese, Pamela, 2015. "Successful lean implementation: Organizational culture and soft lean practices," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 182-201.
    3. Assadej Vanichchinchai, 2023. "Contextual factors on Toyota Way and Agile Manufacturing: an empirical investigation," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1290-1301, September.
    4. Elango, B. & Talluri, Srinivas (Sri), 2023. "A study of the impact of cultural dimensions on the operational orientation of manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    5. Eroglu, Cuneyt & Hofer, Christian & Hofer, Adriana Rossiter & Hou, Young, 2023. "“Cultural inventories”: How dimensions of national culture moderate the effect of demand unpredictability on firm-level inventories," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    6. Abdulaziz M. Almutairi & Mohammed Almanei & Ahmed Al-Ashaab & Konstantinos Salonitis, 2021. "Prioritized Solutions for Overcoming Barriers When Implementing Lean in the Healthcare Supply Chain: A Saudi Perspective," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Abreu-Ledón, René & Luján-García, Darkys E. & Garrido-Vega, Pedro & Escobar-Pérez, Bernabé, 2018. "A meta-analytic study of the impact of Lean Production on business performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 83-102.
    8. Dag Øivind Madsen & Terje Berg & Tonny Stenheim & Janne Vagnild Moum & Inger Overland Bordewich & Maria Storsveen, 2019. "The Long-term Sustainability of Lean as a Management Practice: Survey Evidence on Diffusion and Use of the Concept in Norway in the Period 2015–2017," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-18, June.
    9. Alba Manresa & Andrea Bikfalvi & Alexandra Simon, 2021. "Investigating the impact of new technologies and organizational practices on operational performance: evidence from Spanish manufacturing companies," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(4), pages 1317-1327, December.
    10. Fettermann, Diego Castro & Cavalcante, Caroline Gobbo Sá & Ayala, Néstor Fabián & Avalone, Marianne Costa, 2020. "Configuration of a smart meter for Brazilian customers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    11. George Onofrei & Hung M. Nguyen & Min Zhang & Brian Fynes, 2020. "Building supply chain relational capital: The impact of supplier and customer leveraging on innovation performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3422-3434, December.
    12. Hardcopf, Rick & Liu, Gensheng (Jason) & Shah, Rachna, 2021. "Lean production and operational performance: The influence of organizational culture," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    13. Lewellyn, Krista B. & Bao, Shuji ‘Rosey’, 2015. "R&D Investment in the Global Paper Products Industry: A Behavioral Theory of the Firm and National Culture Perspective," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 1-17.
    14. , Le Nguyen Hoang, 2022. "A multi-group analysis of the impact of lean manufacturing practices on operational performance: Does the national culture matter?," OSF Preprints qpe63, Center for Open Science.
    15. Pearce, Antony & Pons, Dirk & Neitzert, Thomas, 2018. "Implementing lean—Outcomes from SME case studies," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 94-104.
    16. Jie G. McCardle & Mary Beth Rousseau & Dennis Krumwiede, 2019. "The effects of strategic alignment and competitive priorities on operational performance: The role of cultural context," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 4-18, June.
    17. Pearce, Antony & Pons, Dirk, 2019. "Advancing lean management: The missing quantitative approach," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 6(C).
    18. Secchi, Raffaele & Camuffo, Arnaldo, 2019. "Lean implementation failures: The role of organizational ambidexterity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 145-154.
    19. Laura-Maija Hero & Eila Lindfors & Vesa Taatila, 2017. "Individual Innovation Competence: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 6(5), pages 103-103, October.
    20. Iyer, Karthik N.S. & Srivastava, Prashant & Srinivasan, Mahesh, 2019. "Performance implications of lean in supply chains: Exploring the role of learning orientation and relational resources," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 94-104.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    KBI; Innovation; Lean Product Development; Indicators; Field study; Indicateurs; Etude de terrain;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04165613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.