IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03584213.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Le Paradigme Du Developpement Territorial Durable : Les Impulsions De L'Economie Sociale Et Solidaire

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Gianfaldoni

    (LBNC - Laboratoire Biens, Normes, Contrats - AU - Avignon Université)

  • Lucile Manoury

    (LBNC - Laboratoire Biens, Normes, Contrats - AU - Avignon Université)

Abstract

L'objet de notre contribution est centré sur le développement territorial durable, appréhendé comme un paradigme pour lequel et dans lequel l'économie sociale et solidaire est pleinement engagée. Après avoir livré les contours et contenus théoriques de ce paradigme puis énoncé les trajectoires tendant à se dessiner, nous voulons montrer que l'économie sociale et solidaire (ESS) impulse des dynamiques socio-économiques conduisant à l'édification de ce paradigme. Les organisations instituées (OESS), dans leur diversité, contribuent par leurs projets créatifs et leurs activités innovantes au développement territorial durable, mais dans une grande hétérogénéité fonctionnelle/opérationnelle. L'accréditation d'une telle hypothèse conduit à nous interroger sur la plausibilité d'un écosystème territorial durable qui maillerait pour l'essentiel des OESS. Cette problématique ne prend tout son sens qu'au travers d'un diagnostic territorial, qui prend appui sur une recherche conduite sur le Pays d'Arles

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Gianfaldoni & Lucile Manoury, 2021. "Le Paradigme Du Developpement Territorial Durable : Les Impulsions De L'Economie Sociale Et Solidaire," Post-Print hal-03584213, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03584213
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03584213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03584213/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hugues François & Maud Hirczak & Nicolas Senil, 2013. "De la ressource à la trajectoire : quelles stratégies de développement territorial ?," Géographie, économie, société, Lavoisier, vol. 15(3), pages 267-284.
    2. Gabriel Colletis & Bernard Pecqueur, 2018. "Révélation des ressources spécifiques territoriales et inégalités de développement," Post-Print hal-01996843, HAL.
    3. Franck Aggeri & Olivier Godard, 2006. "Les entreprises et le développement durable," Post-Print halshs-00645674, HAL.
    4. Julie Gobert & Sabrina Brullot, 2017. "La mobilisation du capital territorial pour le développement d’une logique d’Écologie industrielle et territoriale," Revue d'économie régionale et urbaine, Armand Colin, vol. 0(5), pages 881-904.
    5. Ron Boschma, 2005. "Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 61-74.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Patrick Gianfaldoni & Lucile Manoury, 2018. "The Contribution Of Fondation De France To Territorialized And Territorializing Processes Of Social Innovation [La contribution de la Fondation de France aux processus territorialisés et territoria," Post-Print hal-02011090, HAL.
    2. Patrick Gianfaldoni & Lucile Manoury, 2018. "La contribution de la Fondation de France à l'empowerment territorial : Développement territorial endogène et processus d'innovation sociale," Post-Print hal-02011097, HAL.
    3. Jarle Aarstad & Olav Andreas Kvitastein & Stig-Erik Jakobsen, 2019. "What Drives Enterprise Product Innovation? Assessing How Regional, National, And International Inter-Firm Collaboration Complement Or Substitute For R&D Investments," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(05), pages 1-25, June.
    4. Emanuela Marrocu & Raffaele Paci & Stefano Usai, 2013. "Productivity Growth In The Old And New Europe: The Role Of Agglomeration Externalities," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 418-442, August.
    5. Shuai Shi & Kathy Pain, 2020. "Investigating China’s Mid-Yangtze River economic growth region using a spatial network growth model," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(14), pages 2973-2993, November.
    6. Jonas Heiberg & Bernhard Truffer, 2021. "The emergence of a global innovation system – a case study from the water sector," GEIST - Geography of Innovation and Sustainability Transitions 2021(09), GEIST Working Paper Series.
    7. Dezhong Duan & Qifan Xia, 2022. "From the United States to China? A trade perspective to reveal the structure and dynamics of global electronic‐telecommunications," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 823-847, June.
    8. Cristina Chaminade & Monica Plechero, 2015. "Do Regions Make a Difference? Regional Innovation Systems and Global Innovation Networks in the ICT Industry," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 215-237, February.
    9. Alexander Cordes & Ulrich Schasse, 2015. "The firm's evaluation of local research institutes and universities - an empirical analysis for Germany," ERSA conference papers ersa15p933, European Regional Science Association.
    10. Julia Olmos‐Peñuela & Paul Benneworth & Elena Castro‐Martínez, 2015. "Exploring the factors related with scientists’ willingness to incorporating external knowledge," CHEPS Working Papers 201504, University of Twente, Center for Higher Education Policy Studies (CHEPS).
    11. Giulia Faggio & Olmo Silva & William C Strange, 2020. "Tales of the city: what do agglomeration cases tell us about agglomeration in general? [The anchor tenant hypothesis: exploring the role of large, local, R&D-intensive firms in regional innovation ," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 20(5), pages 1117-1143.
    12. Ouellet, F. & Mundler, P. & Dupras, J. & Ruiz, J., 2020. "“Community developed and farmer delivered.” An analysis of the spatial and relational proximities of the Alternative Land Use Services program in Ontario," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    13. Alberto Albahari & Magnus Klofsten & Juan Carlos Rubio-Romero, 2019. "Science and Technology Parks: a study of value creation for park tenants," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 1256-1272, August.
    14. de Jong, Jeroen P.J. & Freel, Mark, 2010. "Absorptive capacity and the reach of collaboration in high technology small firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 47-54, February.
    15. Antonelli, Cristiano, 2017. "Digital knowledge generation and the appropriability trade-off," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 991-1002.
    16. Gesa Pflitsch & Verena Radinger-Peer, 2018. "Developing Boundary-Spanning Capacity for Regional Sustainability Transitions—A Comparative Case Study of the Universities of Augsburg (Germany) and Linz (Austria)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-26, March.
    17. Janssen, Matthijs J. & Abbasiharofteh, Milad, 2022. "Boundary spanning R&D collaboration: Key enabling technologies and missions as alleviators of proximity effects?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    18. Franz Tödtling & Michaela Trippl, 2013. "Innovation and Knowledge Links in Metropolitan Regions: The Case of Vienna," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Johan Klaesson & Börje Johansson & Charlie Karlsson (ed.), Metropolitan Regions, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 451-472, Springer.
    19. Philip Cooke, 2009. "The Economic Geography Of Knowledge Flow Hierarchies Among Internationally Networked Medical Bioclusters: A Scientometric Analysis," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 100(3), pages 332-347, July.
    20. Lorenzo Cassi & Anne Plunket, 2014. "Proximity, network formation and inventive performance: in search of the proximity paradox," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 53(2), pages 395-422, September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03584213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.