IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02977457.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How Brand Conversations on Social Media Prompt Jealousy in Brand Relationships

Author

Listed:
  • Andria Andriuzzi

    (UJM - Université Jean Monnet - Saint-Étienne)

  • Géraldine Michel

    (IAE Paris - Sorbonne Business School)

  • Claudiu Dimofte

Abstract

to those they have towards other individuals (Fournier and Alvarez 2012). One increasingly important avenue that practitioners employ in order to bring brands closer to consumers is social media and a wide range of online platforms (Voorveld 2019). A specific form of such interaction, brand conversation, is a particularly relevant construct consisting of a series of online messages exchanged between one or more consumers and a brand [representative]. The exchanges that brands and consumers have on social media are conceptually akin to social interactions, but happen to occur within new media types. Thus, research on social interaction is relevant to understanding the processes that may be at work. In order to answers these questions, our research employs face-work theory (Goffman 1955), attachment theory (Park et al. 2010), and the interpersonal theory of love applied to consumer situations (Whang, Sahoury, and Zhang 2004). We propose that, similar to the case of personal relationships that involve affect, when a partner bestows flattery or compliments onto someone outside of the relationship there is the potential to threaten the other partner and produce jealousy, with potential deleterious effects on the relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Andria Andriuzzi & Géraldine Michel & Claudiu Dimofte, 2020. "How Brand Conversations on Social Media Prompt Jealousy in Brand Relationships," Post-Print hal-02977457, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02977457
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02977457
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-02977457/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul W. Fombelle & Sterling A. Bone & Katherine N. Lemon, 2016. "Responding to the 98%: face-enhancing strategies for dealing with rejected customer ideas," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 685-706, November.
    2. Bernritter, Stefan F. & Verlegh, Peeter W.J. & Smit, Edith G., 2016. "Why Nonprofits Are Easier to Endorse on Social Media: The Roles of Warmth and Brand Symbolism," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 27-42.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eigenraam, Anniek W. & Eelen, Jiska & Verlegh, Peeter W.J., 2021. "Let Me Entertain You? The Importance of Authenticity in Online Customer Engagement," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 53-68.
    2. Kristin Masuch & Maike Greve & Simon Trang, 2021. "What to do after a data breach? Examining apology and compensation as response strategies for health service providers," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(4), pages 829-848, December.
    3. Hu, Miao & Chen, Jie & Chen, Qimei & He, Wei, 2020. "It pays off to be authentic: An examination of direct versus indirect brand mentions on social media," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 19-28.
    4. Li, You & Chang, Yaping & Liang, Zhehao, 2022. "Attracting more meaningful interactions: The impact of question and product types on comments on social media advertisings," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 89-101.
    5. Eelen, Jiska & Özturan, Peren & Verlegh, Peeter W.J., 2017. "The differential impact of brand loyalty on traditional and online word of mouth: The moderating roles of self-brand connection and the desire to help the brand," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 872-891.
    6. Eigenraam, Anniek W. & Eelen, Jiska & van Lin, Arjen & Verlegh, Peeter W.J., 2018. "A Consumer-based Taxonomy of Digital Customer Engagement Practices," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 102-121.
    7. Jha, Subhash & Balaji, M.S. & Peck, Joann & Oakley, Jared & Deitz, George D., 2020. "The Effects of Environmental Haptic Cues on Consumer Perceptions of Retailer Warmth and Competence," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 96(4), pages 590-605.
    8. Japutra, Arnold & Molinillo, Sebastian & Wang, Shasha, 2018. "Aesthetic or self-expressiveness? Linking brand logo benefits, brand stereotypes and relationship quality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 191-200.
    9. Kolbl, Živa & Diamantopoulos, Adamantios & Arslanagic-Kalajdzic, Maja & Zabkar, Vesna, 2020. "Do brand warmth and brand competence add value to consumers? A stereotyping perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 346-362.
    10. Zhang, Shu-Ning & Li, Yong-Quan & Liu, Chih-Hsing & Ruan, Wen-Qi, 2021. "A study on China's time-honored catering brands: Achieving new inheritance of traditional brands," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    11. Hyun Ju Jeong & Jihye Kim, 2021. "Human-like versus me-like brands in corporate social responsibility: the effectiveness of brand anthropomorphism on social perceptions and buying pleasure of brands," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(1), pages 32-47, January.
    12. Adriana ZAIÅ¢ & Andreia Gabriela ANDREI & Ioana-Alexandra HORODNIC & Patricia Elena BERTEA, 2016. "Stereotyping Effects on Cities: Measurement Scales for City's Warmth and Competence," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 4(2), pages 263-275, June.
    13. Seyla Rizky Amelia & Miranti Kartika Dewi, 2021. "How a nonprofit organization delivers online accountability through social media," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 18(3), pages 317-334, September.
    14. Sharma, Monika & Rahman, Zillur, 2022. "Anthropomorphic brand management: An integrated review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 463-475.
    15. Philp, Matthew & Jacobson, Jenna & Pancer, Ethan, 2022. "Predicting social media engagement with computer vision: An examination of food marketing on Instagram," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 736-747.
    16. Audrezet, Alice & de Kerviler, Gwarlann & Guidry Moulard, Julie, 2020. "Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 557-569.
    17. Shakeel ul Rehman & Rafia Gulzar & Wajeeha Aslam, 2022. "Developing the Integrated Marketing Communication (IMC) through Social Media (SM): The Modern Marketing Communication Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    18. Lee, Seonjeong (Ally) & Oh, Haemoon, 2021. "Anthropomorphism and its implications for advertising hotel brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 455-464.
    19. Zhimei Zang & Xiaoyan Wang & Hairu Yang & Chuanming Chen, 2022. "“Be myself” or “Be friends”? Exploring the mechanism between self-construal and sales performance," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 82-105, February.
    20. Quach, Sara & Septianto, Felix & Thaichon, Park & Chiew, Tung Moi, 2021. "Mixed emotional appeal enhances positive word-of-mouth: The moderating role of narrative person," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Brand; Jealousy; Social media; Face-work;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02977457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.