IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02649025.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

On the profitability of selfish blockchain mining under consideration of ruin

Author

Listed:
  • Hansjörg Albrecher
  • Pierre-Olivier Goffard

    (LSAF - Laboratoire de Sciences Actuarielle et Financière - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - Université de Lyon)

Abstract

Mining blocks on a blockchain equipped with a proof of work consensus protocol is well-known to be resource-consuming. A miner bears the operational cost, mainly electricity consumption and IT gear, of mining, and is compensated by a capital gain when a block is discovered. This paper aims at quantifying the profitability of mining when the possible event of ruin is also considered. This is done by formulating a tractable stochastic model and using tools from applied probability and analysis, including the explicit solution of a certain type of advanced functional differential equation. The expected profit at a future time point is determined for the situation when the miner follows the protocol as well as when he/she withholds blocks. The obtained explicit expressions allow us to analyze the sensitivity with respect to the different model components and to identify conditions under which selfish mining is a strategic advantage.

Suggested Citation

  • Hansjörg Albrecher & Pierre-Olivier Goffard, 2021. "On the profitability of selfish blockchain mining under consideration of ruin," Post-Print hal-02649025, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02649025
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2021.2169
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02649025v3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-02649025v3/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2021.2169?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Asmussen, Soren & Avram, Florin & Usabel, Miguel, 2002. "Erlangian Approximations for Finite-Horizon Ruin Probabilities," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 267-281, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hansjoerg Albrecher & Pablo Azcue & Nora Muler, 2025. "Optimal dividends for a NatCat insurer in the presence of a climate tipping point," Papers 2504.19151, arXiv.org.
    2. Bladt, Mogens & Ivanovs, Jevgenijs, 2021. "Fluctuation theory for one-sided Lévy processes with a matrix-exponential time horizon," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 105-123.
    3. Benjamin Avanzi & Hayden Lau & Bernard Wong, 2020. "On the optimality of joint periodic and extraordinary dividend strategies," Papers 2006.00717, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2020.
    4. Cheung, Eric C.K. & Wong, Jeff T.Y., 2017. "On the dual risk model with Parisian implementation delays in dividend payments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(1), pages 159-173.
    5. Avanzi, Benjamin & Lau, Hayden & Wong, Bernard, 2021. "On the optimality of joint periodic and extraordinary dividend strategies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(3), pages 1189-1210.
    6. Hansjoerg Albrecher & Pierre-Olivier Goffard, 2020. "On the profitability of selfish blockchain mining under consideration of ruin," Papers 2010.12577, arXiv.org.
    7. Ran Xu & Wenyuan Wang & Jose Garrido, 2022. "Optimal Dividend Strategy Under Parisian Ruin with Affine Penalty," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 1385-1409, September.
    8. Esther Frostig & Adva Keren-Pinhasik, 2020. "Parisian Ruin with Erlang Delay and a Lower Bankruptcy Barrier," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 101-134, March.
    9. Avanzi, Benjamin & Tu, Vincent & Wong, Bernard, 2018. "Optimal dividends under Erlang(2) inter-dividend decision times," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 225-242.
    10. Benjamin Avanzi & Hayden Lau & Bernard Wong, 2020. "Optimal periodic dividend strategies for spectrally negative L\'evy processes with fixed transaction costs," Papers 2004.01838, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2020.
    11. Søren Asmussen & Mogens Bladt, 2022. "From PH/MAP to ME/RAP," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 100(3), pages 173-175, April.
    12. Fraser Daly & Claude Lefèvre, 2025. "On Geometric-type Approximations with Applications," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Avanzi, Benjamin & Cheung, Eric C.K. & Wong, Bernard & Woo, Jae-Kyung, 2013. "On a periodic dividend barrier strategy in the dual model with continuous monitoring of solvency," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 98-113.
    14. Choi, Michael C.H. & Cheung, Eric C.K., 2014. "On the expected discounted dividends in the Cramér–Lundberg risk model with more frequent ruin monitoring than dividend decisions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 121-132.
    15. David Landriault & Jean-François Renaud & Xiaowen Zhou, 2014. "An Insurance Risk Model with Parisian Implementation Delays," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 583-607, September.
    16. Asmussen, Søren & Avram, Florin & Pistorius, Martijn R., 2004. "Russian and American put options under exponential phase-type Lévy models," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 79-111, January.
    17. Søren Asmussen & Patrick J. Laub & Hailiang Yang, 2019. "Phase-Type Models in Life Insurance: Fitting and Valuation of Equity-Linked Benefits," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-22, February.
    18. Zhimin Zhang & Eric C. K. Cheung, 2016. "The Markov Additive Risk Process Under an Erlangized Dividend Barrier Strategy," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 275-306, June.
    19. Avram, Florin & Palmowski, Zbigniew & Pistorius, Martijn, 2008. "A two-dimensional ruin problem on the positive quadrant," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 227-234, February.
    20. Lee, Wing Yan & Li, Xiaolong & Liu, Fangda & Shi, Yifan & Yam, Sheung Chi Phillip, 2021. "A Fourier-cosine method for finite-time ruin probabilities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 256-267.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02649025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.