IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-02306257.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Quantifier la qualité des soins : une critique de la « rationalisation » de la médecine libérale française

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas da Silva

    (CEPN - Centre d'Economie de l'Université Paris Nord - UP13 - Université Paris 13 - USPC - Université Sorbonne Paris Cité - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

With the logic of quantification of medical work, patients are asked to trust the numerical standards determined by independent health agencies-rather than on the personal relationship with their doctor. If regulation by practices seems to be a rationalization of practices, we propose to show how it is useful to review the method of production of these standards-how can we use Evidence based medicine and randomized clinical trial for health policy?

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas da Silva, 2017. "Quantifier la qualité des soins : une critique de la « rationalisation » de la médecine libérale française," Post-Print hal-02306257, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02306257
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02306257
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-02306257/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lise Rochaix, 1997. "Asymétries d'information et incertitude en santé : les apports de la théorie des contrats," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 129(3), pages 11-24.
    2. Robert G. Evans, 1974. "Supplier-Induced Demand: Some Empirical Evidence and Implications," International Economic Association Series, in: Mark Perlman (ed.), The Economics of Health and Medical Care, chapter 10, pages 162-173, Palgrave Macmillan.
    3. Da Silva, Nicolas & Gadreau, Maryse, 2015. "La médecine libérale en France," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 17.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/9221 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Olson, Mary K., 2008. "The risk we bear: The effects of review speed and industry user fees on new drug safety," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 175-200, March.
    6. Labrousse, Agnès, 2010. "Nouvelle économie du développement et essais cliniques randomisés : une mise en perspective d’un outil de preuve et de gouvernement," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 7.
    7. repec:dau:papers:123456789/9219 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Philippe Batifoulier & Louise Braddock & Victor Duchesne & Ariane Ghirardello & John Latsis, 2021. "Das Targeting von „Lifestyle“-Bedingungen. Welche Rechtfertigungen für die Behandlung? [“Targeting Lifestyle" Conditions: What Justifications for Treatment?]," Post-Print hal-03345323, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicolas da Silva, 2018. "« L'industrialisation de la médecine libérale : une approche par l'économie des conventions »," Post-Print hal-02306255, HAL.
    2. Nicolas da Silva, 2015. "La nouvelle régulation de la médecine libérale : le salut par la quantification ?," Post-Print hal-01480882, HAL.
    3. Bruno Ventelou, 1999. "Les dépenses de santé des Français : une maladie d'amour?," Revue de l'OFCE, Programme National Persée, vol. 71(1), pages 247-280.
    4. Martin Gaynor, 1994. "Issues in the Industrial Organization of the Market for Physician Services," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(1), pages 211-255, March.
    5. Daniel Tobias Michaeli & Thomas Michaeli & Sebastian Albers & Tobias Boch & Julia Caroline Michaeli, 2024. "Special FDA designations for drug development: orphan, fast track, accelerated approval, priority review, and breakthrough therapy," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 25(6), pages 979-997, August.
    6. Florent Bédécarrats & Isabelle Guérin & François Roubaud, 2015. "The gold standard for randomized evaluations: from discussion of method to political economy," Working Papers DT/2015/01, DIAL (Développement, Institutions et Mondialisation).
    7. Sophie Bejean, 1997. "The foundations of the new theories in health economics [Les fondements des nouvelles théories en économie de la santé]," Working Papers hal-01526956, HAL.
    8. NOGUCHI Haruko & SATOSHI Shimizutani, 2005. "Supplier-Induced Demand in Japan's At-home Care Industry: Evidence from Micro-level Survey on Care Receivers," ESRI Discussion paper series 148, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    9. El-Shal, Amira & Cubi-Molla, Patricia & Jofre-Bonet, Mireia, 2021. "Are user fees in health care always evil? Evidence from family planning, maternal, and child health services," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 506-529.
    10. Nilgun Yavuz & Veli Yilanci & Zehra Ozturk, 2013. "Is health care a luxury or a necessity or both? Evidence from Turkey," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 14(1), pages 5-10, February.
    11. Boris Kralj & Jasmin Kantarevic, 2013. "Quality and quantity in primary care mixed-payment models: evidence from family health organizations in Ontario," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 46(1), pages 208-238, February.
    12. Ilke Onur & Magnus Söderberg, 2020. "The impact of regulatory review time on incremental and radical innovation: evidence from the high-risk medical device market," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 134-158, April.
    13. Baker, Laurence C. & Bundorf, M. Kate & Kessler, Daniel P., 2016. "The effect of hospital/physician integration on hospital choice," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1-8.
    14. Gao, Qiuming & Wang, Derek, 2021. "Hospital efficiency and equity in health care delivery: A study based in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    15. Eric Delattre & Brigitte Dormont, 2003. "Fixed fees and physician‐induced demand: A panel data study on French physicians," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(9), pages 741-754, September.
    16. Jean Cartier-Bresson, 2013. "Le pouvoir du positivisme et ses limites : microéconométrie et macroéconométrie actuelles du développement," Working Papers hal-00847005, HAL.
    17. Montmartin, Benjamin & Herrera-Gómez, Marcos, 2023. "Spatial dependence in physicians’ prices and additional fees: Evidence from France," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    18. Si, Yafei & Zhou, Zhongliang & Su, Min & Hu, Han & Yang, Zesen & Chen, Xi, 2020. "Re-examining Supplier-induced Demand in Health Care: Comparisons Among Patients Affiliated and Not Affiliated with Healthcare Professionals in China," GLO Discussion Paper Series 688, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    19. Philippe Ulmann, 2004. "Est-il possible (souhaitable) de maîtriser les dépenses de santé ?," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 76(3), pages 19-37.
    20. Kevin Callison & Robert Kaestner & Jason Ward, 2018. "A Test of Supply-side Explanations of Geographic Variation in Health Care Use," NBER Working Papers 25037, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02306257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.