IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01965683.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

L’État stratège : État « réduit » ou « à capacité étendue » en régime de gouvernance multi-niveaux ?

Author

Listed:
  • Philippe Bance

    (CREAM - Centre de Recherche en Economie Appliquée à la Mondialisation - UNIROUEN - Université de Rouen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université - IRIHS - Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire Homme et Société - UNIROUEN - Université de Rouen Normandie - NU - Normandie Université)

Abstract

La France a connu depuis les années 1980 de profondes transformations de son régime de gouvernance des politiques publiques. Très fortement imprégné antérieurement de la tradition jacobine, d'une logique centraliste qui confère à l'Etat un rôle très prééminent dans la spécification et la mise en oeuvre des politiques publiques, le modèle français s'en est trouvé grandement remis en cause. Si l'Etat entend encore aujourd'hui impulser l'action publique, un double mouvement a battu en brèche son hégémonie traditionnelle. La place croissante prise par les politiques européennes a en effet fait perdre une grande partie de leur substance aux politiques publiques nationales. Une majorité de textes législatifs des pays de l'UE sont ainsi aujourd'hui des transpositions de directives européennes. Depuis l'acte unique européen, des politiques qui relevaient de la pleine souveraineté de l'Etat nation sont aujourd'hui strictement encadrées et orientées par les dispositifs communautaires. Ce processus de décentralisation territoriale s'est doublé dans les années 2000 d'une décentralisation fonctionnelle, relative aux établissements publics chargés de gérer un service public, tels les universités, les hôpitaux publics, les musées nationaux. L'objet de ce chapitre est d'analyser les répercussions de ces transformations sur la conduite des politiques publiques pour un Etat se voulant stratège dans le cadre d'un régime dit de "gouvernance multi-niveaux".

Suggested Citation

  • Philippe Bance, 2016. "L’État stratège : État « réduit » ou « à capacité étendue » en régime de gouvernance multi-niveaux ?," Post-Print hal-01965683, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01965683
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://normandie-univ.hal.science/hal-01965683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://normandie-univ.hal.science/hal-01965683/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philippe Bance, 2015. "L'internalisation des des missions d'intérêt général par les organisations publiques. Réalités d'aujourd'hui et perspectives," Post-Print halshs-01964960, HAL.
    2. Coriat, Benjamin, 2013. "Le retour des communs," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 14.
    3. Pollitt, Christopher & Bouckaert, Geert, 2004. "Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199268498, Decembrie.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Philippe Bance & Angelique Chassy, 2017. "The Rollout of the Multilevel Governance System: A Source of Reworking the Contingent Valuation Method?," Post-Print halshs-01965114, HAL.
    2. Philippe Bance & Angélique Chassy, 2016. "Opportunités et limites de la Méthode d'Évaluation Contingente (MEC) en régime de gouvernance multiniveaux," Post-Print halshs-01965092, HAL.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philippe Bance, 2016. "Les frontières institutionnelles de l’action publique en régime de gouvernance multi-niveaux," Post-Print hal-01965932, HAL.
    2. Tóth, Balázs, 2021. "Milyen kapcsolatban állnak a közszféra reformjai a gazdaságpolitikai paradigmákkal? [How reforms of the public sector relate to the paradigms of economic policy]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 205-222.
    3. Independent Evaluation Group, 2008. "Public Sector Reform: What Works and Why? An IEG evaluation of World Bank Support," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6484, December.
    4. Alessio Conti & Giovanni Vetritto, 2019. "ICT from Below: ELISA Program and the Innovation of Local Government in Italy," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 7(3), pages 70-92, May.
    5. repec:cuf:journl:y:2017:v:18:i:1:moreno-enguix is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Rebora, Gianfranco & Turri, Matteo, 2013. "The UK and Italian research assessment exercises face to face," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 1657-1666.
    7. Allaire, Gilles, 2013. "Les communs comme infrastructure institutionnelle de l’économie marchande," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 14.
    8. Ahmed Huque, 2013. "Can Public Management Contribute to Governance in Developing Countries?," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 397-409, December.
    9. Odeck, James & Høyem, Harald, 2021. "The impact of competitive tendering on operational costs and market concentration in public transport: The Norwegian car ferry services," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    10. van der Voet, Joris, 2014. "The effectiveness and specificity of change management in a public organization: Transformational leadership and a bureaucratic organizational structure," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 373-382.
    11. Oliver Bruttel, 2005. "Are Employment Zones Successful? Evidence From the First Four Years," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 20(4), pages 389-403, November.
    12. Chanida Jittaruttha, 2017. "Public Trust and Governance in Public Administration in Thailand," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 5808123, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    13. Tom Christensen & Per Lægreid, 2008. "The Challenge of Coordination in Central Government Organizations: The Norwegian Case," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 97-116, June.
    14. Gentiana Kraja, 2013. "Managing Human Resources in Albanian Public Administration," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 2, March.
    15. Ishchenko M.P. & Samoilenko L.Y., 2016. "Contemporary Issues Of Public Management And Administration In Ukraine," Management, Academy of Municipal Administration, vol. 9(2), pages 7-15, May.
    16. Philippe Henry, 2018. "Cultural entrepreneurship : generic tensions amplified by the small size of organisations [L'entrepreneuriat culturel : des tensions génériques qu'amplifie la petite taille des organisations]," Post-Print hal-01796400, HAL.
    17. Andrews, Matt, 2015. "Has Sweden Injected Realism into Public Financial Management Reforms in Partner Countries?," Working Paper Series 15-063, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    18. Koen Verhoest & Paola Mattei, 2010. "Special Issue on ‘Welfare governance reforms and effects in the Post-Golden Age’," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 163-171, March.
    19. Imre Gergely Szabó & Marta Kahancová, 2012. "Acting on the Edge of Public Sector: Hospital Corporatization and Collective Bargaining in Hungary and Slovakia," Discussion Papers 1, Central European Labour Studies Institute (CELSI).
    20. Nizar Al-Sharif & Nazha Bourquia, 2011. "Les systèmes de mesure de performance en collectivités territoriales : un éclairage à la lecture du processus d'institutionnalisation," Post-Print hal-00645365, HAL.
    21. Anup Chowdhury & Nikhil Chandra Shil, 2017. "Public Sector Reforms and New Public Management: Exploratory Evidence from Australian Public Sector," Asian Development Policy Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(1), pages 1-16, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01965683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.