IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-01892003.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Adaptation, Recombination and Reinforcement

Author

Listed:
  • Sigrid Quack

    (Universität Duisburg-Essen = University of Duisburg-Essen [Essen])

  • Marie-Laure Salles-Djelic

    (CSO - Centre de sociologie des organisations (Sciences Po, CNRS) - Sciences Po - Sciences Po - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)

Abstract

We consider, in this paper, national business system change in relation to transnational institution building. Our field of exploration is antitrust regulation and competition law, its emergence and development both in Germany and at the European level. It is increasingly acknowledged that legal frameworks structure market economies and constrain economic behavior (Laporta et al. 1998, De Soto 2000, Fligstein 2001, Berglöf et al. 2001). We see the legal treatment of competition issues as important in that respect (Dobbin and Dowd 2000, Djelic 2002). [First paragraph]

Suggested Citation

  • Sigrid Quack & Marie-Laure Salles-Djelic, 2005. "Adaptation, Recombination and Reinforcement," Post-Print hal-01892003, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01892003
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-01892003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-01892003/document
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barnett, Michael N. & Finnemore, Martha, 1999. "The Politics, Power, and Pathologies of International Organizations," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(4), pages 699-732, October.
    2. Kari Lilja & Eli Moen, 2003. "Coordinating Transnational Competition: Changing Patterns in the European Pulp and Paper Industry," Chapters, in: Marie-Laure Djelic & Sigrid Quack (ed.), Globalization and Institutions, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Mattli, Walter & Slaughter, Anne-Marie, 1998. "Revisiting the European Court of Justice," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(1), pages 177-209, January.
    4. Dieter Plehwe & Stefano Vescovi, 2003. "Europe's Special Case: The Five Corners of Business–state Interactions," Chapters, in: Marie-Laure Djelic & Sigrid Quack (ed.), Globalization and Institutions, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Marie-Laure Salles-Djelic & Sigrid Quack, 2003. "Globalization as a double process of institutional change and institution building," Post-Print hal-01892013, HAL.
    6. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/3sc009knbe9j2q0k2n0irvokl1 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Atle Midttun & Augusto Rupérez Micola & Terje Omland, 2003. "Path-dependent National Systems or European Convergence? The Case of European Electricity Markets," Chapters, in: Marie-Laure Djelic & Sigrid Quack (ed.), Globalization and Institutions, chapter 7, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Alter, Karen J., 1998. "Who Are the “Masters of the Treaty†?: European Governments and the European Court of Justice," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(1), pages 121-147, January.
    9. Marie-Laure Salles-Djelic, 1998. "Exporting the American Model," Post-Print hal-01892020, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ergen, Timur & Kohl, Sebastian, 2017. "Varieties of economization in competition policy: A comparative analysis of German and American antitrust doctrines, 1960-2000," MPIfG Discussion Paper 17/18, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    2. Marie-Laure Djelic & Sigrid Quack, 2006. "Rethinking Path Dependency: The Crooked Path of Institutional Change in Post-War Germany," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/2b86iahfka8, Sciences Po.
    3. Moohyung Cho & Tim Büthe, 2021. "From rule‐taker to rule‐promoting regulatory state: South Korea in the nearly‐global competition regime," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 513-543, July.
    4. Matthieu MONTALBAN & Sigfrido RAMIREZ-PEREZ & Andy SMITH, 2011. "EU Competition Policy Revisited: Economic Doctrines Within European Political Work," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2011-33, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    5. Nicole Bolleyer & Valeria Smirnova & Fabrizio Di Mascio & Alessandro Natalini, 2020. "Conflict of interest regulation in European parliaments: Studying the evolution of complex regulatory regimes," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(3), pages 428-446, July.
    6. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/2b86iahfka8nib85jevjn10bsn is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marie-Laure Djelic & Sigrid Quack, 2005. "Adaptation, Recombination and Reinforcement: The Story of Antitrust and Competition Law in Germany And Europe," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/26l5o52m2c8, Sciences Po.
    2. Sigrid Quack & Marie-Laure Salles-Djelic, 2005. "Adaptation, Recombination and Reinforcement," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-01892003, HAL.
    3. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/26l5o52m2c857apcgdgcplhr3h is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Marie-Laure Djelic & Sigrid Quack, 2006. "Rethinking Path Dependency: The Crooked Path of Institutional Change in Post-War Germany," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/2b86iahfka8, Sciences Po.
    5. José Luis Castro-Montero & Edwin Alblas & Arthur Dyevre & Nicolas Lampach, 2018. "The Court of Justice and treaty revision: A case of strategic leniency?," European Union Politics, , vol. 19(4), pages 570-596, December.
    6. Heather A. D. Mbaye, 2001. "Why National States Comply with Supranational Law," European Union Politics, , vol. 2(3), pages 259-281, October.
    7. Clifford J. Carrubba & Matthew Gabel, 2005. "Do Governments Sway European Court of Justice Decision-making?: Evidence from Government Court Briefs," Working Papers 2005-06, University of Kentucky, Institute for Federalism and Intergovernmental Relations.
    8. Andreas Grimmel, 2011. "Integration and the Context of Law: Why the European Court of Justice is not a Political Actor," Les Cahiers européens de Sciences Po 3, Centre d'études européennes (CEE) at Sciences Po, Paris.
    9. Susanne K. Schmidt, 2000. "Only an Agenda Setter?," European Union Politics, , vol. 1(1), pages 37-61, February.
    10. Grimmel, Andreas, 2011. "Politics in robes? The European Court of Justice and the myth of judicial activism," Discussion Papers 2/11, Europa-Kolleg Hamburg, Institute for European Integration.
    11. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/2b86iahfka8nib85jevjn10bsn is not listed on IDEAS
    12. William Phelan, 2008. "Why do EU Member States Offer a 'Constitutional' Obedience to EU Obligations? Encompassing Domestic Institutions and Costly International Obligations," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp256, IIIS.
    13. Marie-Laure Djelic & Sigrid Quack, 2006. "Rethinking Path Dependency: The Crooked Path of Institutional Change in Post-War Germany," Post-Print hal-01891994, HAL.
    14. Tridimas, George & Tridimas, Takis, 2004. "National courts and the European Court of Justice: a public choice analysis of the preliminary reference procedure," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 125-145, June.
    15. Darren Hawkins & Wade Jacoby, 2008. "Agent permeability, principal delegation and the European Court of Human Rights," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-28, March.
    16. Clifford J. Carrubba, 2003. "The European Court of Justice, Democracy, and Enlargement," European Union Politics, , vol. 4(1), pages 75-100, March.
    17. Blome, Kerstin, 2011. "Wie erfolgversprechend ist die Reproduktion institutionellen Designs? Individualbeschwerden im Kontext des Inter-Amerikanischen Menschenrechtssystems sowie des juristischen Systems der Andengemeinscha," TranState Working Papers 144, University of Bremen, Collaborative Research Center 597: Transformations of the State.
    18. Lauren Peritz, 2018. "Obstructing integration: Domestic politics and the European Court of Justice," European Union Politics, , vol. 19(3), pages 427-457, September.
    19. Adela Toscano-Valle & Antonio Sianes & Francisco Santos-Carrillo & Luis A. Fernández-Portillo, 2022. "Can the Rational Design of International Institutions Solve Cooperation Problems? Insights from a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    20. Marie-Laure Djelic, 2013. "When Limited Liability was (Still) an Issue: Mobilization and Politics of Signification in 19th-Century England," Post-Print hal-01891965, HAL.
    21. Frank Biermann, 2005. "Between the USA and the South: strategic choices for European climate policy," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 273-290, May.
    22. Stutzer Alois & Frey Bruno S., 2006. "Making International Organizations More Democratic," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 1(3), pages 305-330, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Antitrust law; Germany; Europe;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01892003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.