The impact of voters’ preference diversity on the probability of some electoral outcomes
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2013.07.007
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.univ-reunion.fr/hal-01243417
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Other versions of this item:
- Gehrlein, William V. & Moyouwou, Issofa & Lepelley, Dominique, 2013. "The impact of voters’ preference diversity on the probability of some electoral outcomes," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 352-365.
References listed on IDEAS
- William Gehrlein & Peter Fishburn, 1976. "Condorcet's paradox and anonymous preference profiles," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-18, June.
- William V. Gehrlein, 2002. "Obtaining representations for probabilities of voting outcomes with effectively unlimited precision integer arithmetic," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 19(3), pages 503-512.
- Gehrlein, William V. & Lepelley, Dominique, 2001. "The Condorcet efficiency of Borda Rule with anonymous voters," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 39-50, January.
- Lepelley, Dominique & Mbih, Boniface, 1987. "The proportion of coalitionally unstable situations under the plurality rule," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 311-315.
- Geoffrey Pritchard & Mark Wilson, 2007. "Exact results on manipulability of positional voting rules," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 29(3), pages 487-513, October.
- Dominique Lepelley & Ahmed Louichi & Hatem Smaoui, 2008.
"On Ehrhart polynomials and probability calculations in voting theory,"
Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 30(3), pages 363-383, April.
- Dominique Lepelley & Ahmed Louichi & Hatem Smaoui, 2006. "On Ehrhart Polynomials and Probability Calculations in Voting Theory," Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes 1 & University of Caen) 200610, Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes 1, University of Caen and CNRS.
- Dominique Lepelley & Ahmed Louichi & Hatem Smaoui, 2007. "On Ehrhart polynomials and probability calculations in voting theory," Post-Print hal-01245310, HAL.
- Gehrlein, William V., 1982. "Condorcet efficiency and constant scoring rules," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 123-130, March.
- Wilson, Mark C. & Pritchard, Geoffrey, 2007. "Probability calculations under the IAC hypothesis," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 244-256, December.
- Davide Cervone & William Gehrlein & William Zwicker, 2005. "Which Scoring Rule Maximizes Condorcet Efficiency Under Iac?," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 145-185, March.
- Gibbard, Allan, 1973. "Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 41(4), pages 587-601, July.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Mostapha Diss & Boris Tsvelikhovskiy, 2019.
"Manipulable outcomes within the class of scoring voting rules,"
Papers
1911.09173, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2020.
- Mostapha Diss & Boris Tsvelikhovskiy, 2020. "Manipulable outcomes within the class of scoring voting rules," Working Papers 2020-08, CRESE.
- Moyouwou, Issofa & Tchantcho, Hugue, 2017. "Asymptotic vulnerability of positional voting rules to coalitional manipulation," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 70-82.
- William Gehrlein & Dominique Lepelley & Issofa Moyouwou, 2015.
"Voters’ preference diversity, concepts of agreement and Condorcet’s paradox,"
Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(6), pages 2345-2368, November.
- William V. Gehrlein & Dominique Lepelley & Issofa Moyouwou, 2015. "Voters’ preference diversity, concepts of agreement and Condorcet’s paradox," Post-Print hal-01452557, HAL.
- Gehrlein, William V. & Lepelley, Dominique & Moyouwou, Issofa, 2016.
"A note on Approval Voting and electing the Condorcet loser,"
Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 115-122.
- William V. Gehrlein & Dominique Lepelley & Issofa Moyouwou, 2016. "A note on Approval Voting and electing the Condorcet loser," Post-Print hal-01452548, HAL.
- Alexander Karpov, 2017.
"Preference Diversity Orderings,"
Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 753-774, July.
- Karpov, Alexander, 2016. "Preference diversity orderings," Working Papers 0610, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
- Marie-Louise Lackner & Martin Lackner, 2017. "On the likelihood of single-peaked preferences," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 48(4), pages 717-745, April.
- Alexander Karpov, 2017.
"Preference Diversity Orderings,"
Group Decision and Negotiation,
Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 753-774, July.
- Alexander Karpov, 0. "Preference Diversity Orderings," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-22.
- Karpov, Alexander, 2016. "Preference diversity orderings," Working Papers 0610, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Mostapha Diss & Boris Tsvelikhovskiy, 2019.
"Manipulable outcomes within the class of scoring voting rules,"
Papers
1911.09173, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2020.
- Mostapha Diss & Boris Tsvelikhovskiy, 2020. "Manipulable outcomes within the class of scoring voting rules," Working Papers 2020-08, CRESE.
- Moyouwou, Issofa & Tchantcho, Hugue, 2017. "Asymptotic vulnerability of positional voting rules to coalitional manipulation," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 70-82.
- Mostapha Diss, 2015.
"Strategic manipulability of self-selective social choice rules,"
Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 229(1), pages 347-376, June.
- Mostapha Diss, 2013. "Strategic manipulability of self-selective social choice rules," Working Papers halshs-00785366, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss, 2013. "Strategic manipulability of self-selective social choice rules," Working Papers 1302, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
- Mostapha Diss, 2015. "Strategic manipulability of self-selective social choice rules," Post-Print halshs-01136401, HAL.
- Wilson, Mark C. & Pritchard, Geoffrey, 2007. "Probability calculations under the IAC hypothesis," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 54(3), pages 244-256, December.
- William V. Gehrlein & Dominique Lepelley & Florenz Plassmann, 2016.
"Should voters be required to rank candidates in an election?,"
Social Choice and Welfare,
Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 46(4), pages 707-747, April.
- William V. Gehrlein & Dominique Lepelley & Florenz Plassmann, 2015. "Should voters be required to rank candidates in an election?," Post-Print hal-01243409, HAL.
- Eric Kamwa, 2019.
"On the Likelihood of the Borda Effect: The Overall Probabilities for General Weighted Scoring Rules and Scoring Runoff Rules,"
Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 519-541, June.
- Eric Kamwa, 2019. "On the Likelihood of the Borda Effect: The Overall Probabilities for General Weighted Scoring Rules and Scoring Runoff Rules," Post-Print hal-01786590, HAL.
- Eric Kamwa, 2018. "On the Likelihood of the Borda Effect: The Overall Probabilities for General Weighted Scoring Rules and Scoring Runoff Rules," Working Papers hal-01786590, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss & Ahmed Doghmi, 2016.
"Multi-winner scoring election methods: Condorcet consistency and paradoxes,"
Public Choice, Springer, vol. 169(1), pages 97-116, October.
- Mostapha Diss & Ahmed Doghmi, 2016. "Multi-winner scoring election methods: Condorcet consistency and paradoxes," Working Papers halshs-01285526, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss & Ahmed Doghmi, 2016. "Multi-winner scoring election methods: Condorcet consistency and paradoxes," Post-Print halshs-01381394, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss & Ahmed Doghmi, 2016. "Multi-winner scoring election methods: Condorcet consistency and paradoxes," Working Papers 1613, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
- Pritchard, Geoffrey & Wilson, Mark C., 2009. "Asymptotics of the minimum manipulating coalition size for positional voting rules under impartial culture behaviour," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 35-57, July.
- Erik Friese & William V. Gehrlein & Dominique Lepelley & Achill Schürmann, 2017.
"The impact of dependence among voters’ preferences with partial indifference,"
Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(6), pages 2793-2812, November.
- Erik Friese & William V. Gehrlein & Dominique Lepelley & Achill Schürmann, 2016. "The Impact of Dependence among Voters’ Preferences with Partial Indifference," Post-Print hal-01450829, HAL.
- Cervone, Davide P. & Dai, Ronghua & Gnoutcheff, Daniel & Lanterman, Grant & Mackenzie, Andrew & Morse, Ari & Srivastava, Nikhil & Zwicker, William S., 2012. "Voting with rubber bands, weights, and strings," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 11-27.
- Mostapha Diss & Patrizia Pérez-Asurmendi, 2016.
"Consistent collective decisions under majorities based on difference of votes,"
Theory and Decision,
Springer, vol. 80(3), pages 473-494, March.
- Mostapha Diss & Patrizia Pérez-Asurmendi, 2015. "Consistent collective decisions under majorities based on difference of votes," Working Papers 1533, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
- Mostapha Diss, 2016. "Consistent collective decisions under majorities based on difference of votes," Post-Print halshs-01196091, HAL.
- Achill Schürmann, 2013. "Exploiting polyhedral symmetries in social choice," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 40(4), pages 1097-1110, April.
- Diss, Mostapha & Louichi, Ahmed & Merlin, Vincent & Smaoui, Hatem, 2012.
"An example of probability computations under the IAC assumption: The stability of scoring rules,"
Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 57-66.
- Mostapha Diss & Ahmed Louichi & Vincent Merlin & H. Smaoui, 2012. "An example of probability computations under the IAC assumption: The stability of scoring rules," Post-Print halshs-00667660, HAL.
- Mostapha Diss & Patrizia Pérez-Asurmendi, 2015. "Consistent collective decisions under majorities based on difference of votes," Working Papers halshs-01241996, HAL.
- Gehrlein, William V., 2004. "The effectiveness of weighted scoring rules when pairwise majority rule cycles exist," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 69-85, January.
- Yuliya Veselova, 2016.
"The difference between manipulability indices in the IC and IANC models,"
Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 46(3), pages 609-638, March.
- Yuliya Veselova, 2012. "The difference between manipulability indexes in IC and IANC models," HSE Working papers WP BRP 17/EC/2012, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
- Mostapha Diss & Eric Kamwa & Issofa Moyouwou & Hatem Smaoui, 2021.
"Condorcet Efficiency of General Weighted Scoring Rules Under IAC: Indifference and Abstention,"
Studies in Choice and Welfare, in: Mostapha Diss & Vincent Merlin (ed.), Evaluating Voting Systems with Probability Models, pages 55-73,
Springer.
- Mostapha Diss & Issofa Moyouwou & Hatem Smaoui & Eric Kamwa, 2021. "Condorcet efficiency of general weighted scoring rules under IAC: indifference and abstention," Post-Print hal-02196387, HAL.
- Yuliya A. Veselova, 2020. "Does Incomplete Information Reduce Manipulability?," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 523-548, June.
- Abdelhalim El Ouafdi & Dominique Lepelley & Hatem Smaoui, 2020. "Probabilities of electoral outcomes: from three-candidate to four-candidate elections," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 88(2), pages 205-229, March.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01243417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.