IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Design Thinking and Participation: Lessons Learned from Three Case Studies


  • Olivier Glassey

    () (IDHEAP - Institut de hautes études en administration publique - Swiss Public Administration Network)

  • Jean-Henry Morin

    (Centre Universitaire d'Informatique - UNIGE - Université de Genève)

  • Patrick Genoud

    (Observatoire technologique - Etat de Genève)

  • Giorgio Pauletto

    (Observatoire technologique - Etat de Genève)


This paper examines how design thinking and serious games approaches can be used to support participation through the analysis of three case studies. Indeed we will analyze these approaches in three different contexts: (i) a state-owned multi-utilities company; (ii) a political party; (iii) an information system strategic committee. Our analysis framework relies on the concepts of "perceived usefulness" and "perceived ease of use" and we will use it to discuss the lessons learned. Our main finding is that these approaches really contributing in making complex and abstract matters more "tangible" and thus understandable.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Glassey & Jean-Henry Morin & Patrick Genoud & Giorgio Pauletto, 2011. "Design Thinking and Participation: Lessons Learned from Three Case Studies," Post-Print hal-00616740, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00616740
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23333-3_12
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server:

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Jean-Paul Rodrigue, 2006. "Transportation and the Geographical and Functional Integration of Global Production Networks," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 510-525.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    participation; design thinking; serious games; case study; perceived usefulness;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00616740. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.