IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-00481194.html

Floors, dealer markets and limit order markets

Author

Listed:
  • Thierry Foucault

    (GSIA, Carnegie Mellon University - CMU - Carnegie Mellon University [Pittsburgh])

  • Bruno Biais

  • Francois Salanie

Abstract

In dealer markets, liquidity suppliers have entire flexibility to bargain on the price with their customers. In limit order markets, they are restricted to convex schedules: they cannot sell the first share at a higher price than the second. Floor traders simply respond to the liquidity demand conveyed by brokers by crying out one price. In floor markets risk-sharing is inefficient and spreads are large. In dealer markets, risk-sharing can be efficient, but spreads tend to be large. In limit order markets, the unique equilibrium entails efficient risk-sharing and competitive spreads. Hence there is a non-monotonic relation between the efficiency of the market and the extent to which the offers of the liquidity suppliers are restricted.

Suggested Citation

  • Thierry Foucault & Bruno Biais & Francois Salanie, 1998. "Floors, dealer markets and limit order markets," Post-Print hal-00481194, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00481194
    DOI: 10.1016/S1386-4181(98)00003-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dyhrberg, Anne H. & Foley, Sean & Svec, Jiri, 2023. "When Bigger is Better: The Impact of a Tiny Tick Size on Undercutting Behavior," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 58(6), pages 2387-2416, September.
    2. Sjur Didrik Flåm, 2024. "Via Order Markets Towards Price-Taking Equilibrium," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 201(3), pages 977-994, June.
    3. Attar, Andrea & Mariotti, Thomas & Salanié, François, 2019. "On competitive nonlinear pricing," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 14(1), January.
    4. Ghadhab, Imen & Hellara, Slaheddine, 2016. "Price discovery of cross-listed firms," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 177-188.
    5. Biais, Bruno & Glosten, Larry & Spatt, Chester, 2005. "Market microstructure: A survey of microfoundations, empirical results, and policy implications," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 8(2), pages 217-264, May.
    6. Hwang, Hae-shin & Jindapon, Paan, 2020. "Market making with convex quotes," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    7. Lescourret, Laurence & Moinas, Sophie, 2014. "Liquidity Supply across Multiple Trading Venues," TSE Working Papers 14-533, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Mar 2015.
    8. repec:dau:papers:123456789/295 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Xing, Xiaochuan & Xue, Yi, 2017. "Trading mechanisms and market quality: Limit-order books versus dealership markets," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 35-44.
    10. G. Wuyts, 2007. "Stock Market Liquidity.Determinants and Implications," Review of Business and Economic Literature, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Review of Business and Economic Literature, vol. 0(2), pages 279-316.
    11. Gunther Capelle-Blancard & Séverine Vandelanoite, 2000. "Intraday relations between CAC 40 cash index and CAC 40 index options [Relations intrajournalières entre l'indice CAC 40 et les options sur indice. Quel est le marché préféré des investisseurs informés ?]," Post-Print halshs-03727911, HAL.
    12. Minarelli, Francesca & Galioto, Francesco & Raggi, Meri & Viaggi, Davide, 2016. "Modelling asymmetric information in a food supply chain within Emilia Romagna Region," 149th Seminar, October 27-28, 2016, Rennes, France 245071, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. repec:dau:papers:123456789/3017 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Aase, Knut K. & Gjesdal, Frøystein, 2016. "Insider trading with non-fiduciary market makers," Discussion Papers 2016/8, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    15. Viswanathan, S. & Wang, James J. D., 2002. "Market architecture: limit-order books versus dealership markets," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 127-167, April.
    16. Peter Koudijs, 2015. "Those Who Know Most: Insider Trading in Eighteenth-Century Amsterdam," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 123(6), pages 1356-1409.
    17. Daures-Lescourret, Laurence & Moinas, Sophie, 2023. "Fragmentation and Strategic Market-Making," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 58(4), pages 1675-1700, June.
    18. Iwatsubo, Kentaro & Rhee, S. Ghon & Zhang, Ye Zhou, 2023. "Dealership versus continuous auction: Evidence from the JASDAQ market," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    19. Imen Ghadhab & Slaheddine Hellara & Abdelkader Derbali, 2018. "Why do firms make an additional cross-listing? An empirical investigation using multiple failure time model," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(3), pages 191-203, May.
    20. Martin Angerer & Marius Gramlich & Michael Hanke, 2025. "Order Book Liquidity on Crypto Exchanges," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-29, February.
    21. Matthew Spiegel & Harry Mamaysky, 2001. "A Theory of Mutual Funds: Optimal Fund Objectives and Industry Organization," Yale School of Management Working Papers amz2507, Yale School of Management.
    22. H�lena Beltran-Lopez & Joachim Grammig & Albert J. Menkveld, 2012. "Limit order books and trade informativeness," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(9), pages 737-759, October.
    23. Moez Bennouri, 2003. "Auction versus Dealership Markets," CIRANO Working Papers 2003s-67, CIRANO.
    24. Scott Brown & Timothy Koch & Eric Powers, 2009. "Slippage And The Choice Of Market Or Limit Orders In Futures Trading," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 32(3), pages 309-335, September.
    25. Gunther Capelle-Blancard & Séverine Vandelanoite, 2002. "Relations intrajournalières entre l'indice CAC 40 et les options sur indice : Quel est le marché préféré des investisseurs informés ?," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 66, pages 143-177.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00481194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.