IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Telecommunications: understanding the dynamics of the organization of the industry

Listed author(s):
  • Jean-Luc Gaffard

    (GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis - CNRS)

  • Jackie Krafft

    (GREDEG - Groupe de Recherche en Droit, Economie et Gestion - UNS - Université Nice Sophia Antipolis - CNRS)

This paper focuses on the evolution of the telecommunications industry. Within the economic literature, different analytical assumptions are proposed, from a global sustainability of competition to the re-emergence of a stable oligopoly generated by a process of shakeout through mergers and acquisitions. In a nutshell, then, the understanding of the dynamics of the organization of the industry is still an open question with a multiplicity of answers. The main purpose of this paper is to clarify this timely debate, and to sustain that the organization of the industry is progressively evolving towards an oligopoly structure. The specificities of the argument developed in this paper are the following. Firstly, the paper confronts different analytical frameworks, namely mainstream and evolutionary-based, on key questions such as the successful entry and long term sustainability of new telecommunications carriers, as well as new actors such as Internet-related companies. Secondly, the paper analyses the industry as a broad system called ‘info-communications' and composed of ‘vertically-related' subsystems such as equipment suppliers, telecommunications carriers, Internet access and service providers, broadcasting and middleware groups. Thirdly, the paper analyzes past and current restructurings observed within this industry over the last twenty years, in order to infer reliable conclusions on the future evolution of this industry. Fourthly, the paper advocates that the evolution of the organization of the industry is highly connected to the characteristics of the innovative process and to the conditions of its implementation.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00203655/document
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by HAL in its series Post-Print with number hal-00203655.

as
in new window

Length:
Date of creation: 2001
Publication status: Published in Telecomvisions, 2001, http://www.telecomvisions.com
Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00203655
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00203655
Contact details of provider: Web page: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as
in new window


  1. M. Amendola & J. -L. Gaffard & P. Musso, 2000. "Competition, Innovation And Increasing Returns," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 149-181.
  2. Jackie Krafft & Jacques-Laurent Ravix, 2000. "Competition and industrial coordination," Post-Print hal-00212287, HAL.
  3. Mark Armstrong & Simon Cowan & John Vickers, 1994. "Regulatory Reform: Economic Analysis and British Experience," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262510790, July.
  4. Gong, Jiong & Srinagesh, Padmanabhan, 1996. "Network Competition and Industry Structure," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, vol. 5(4), pages 1231-1241.
  5. Amendola, Mario & Gaffard, Jean-Luc, 1994. "Markets and organizations as coherent systems of innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 627-635, November.
  6. Armstrong, M., 1996. "Network interconnection," Discussion Paper Series In Economics And Econometrics 9625, Economics Division, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton.
  7. Klepper, Steven, 1997. "Industry Life Cycles," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(1), pages 145-181.
  8. Amendola, Mario & Gaffard, Jean-Luc, 1998. "Out of Equilibrium," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198293804.
  9. Richardson, G B, 1972. "The Organisation of Industry," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 82(327), pages 883-896, September.
  10. Katz, Michael L, 1996. "Remarks on the Economic Implications of Convergence," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, vol. 5(4), pages 1079-1095.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00203655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (CCSD)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.