IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gro/rugggd/gd-116.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Joint Estimation of Supply and Use Tables

Author

Listed:
  • Temurshoev, Umed

    (Groningen University)

Abstract

We propose a new biproportional method specifically designed for joint projection of Supply and Use tables (SUTs). In contrast to standard inputoutput techniques, this method does not require the availability of total outputs by product for the projection year(s), a condition which is not often met in practice. The algorithm, called the SUT-RAS method, jointly estimates SUTs that are immediately consistent. It is applicable to different settings of SUTs, such as the frameworks with basic prices and purchasers? prices, and a setting in which Use tables are separated into domestic and imported uses. Our empirical evaluations show that the SUT-RAS method performs quite well compared to widely used short-cut methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Temurshoev, Umed, 2010. "Joint Estimation of Supply and Use Tables," GGDC Research Memorandum GD-116, Groningen Growth and Development Centre, University of Groningen.
    • Handle: RePEc:gro:rugggd:gd-116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://irs.ub.rug.nl/ppn/325608512
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Randall Jackson & Alan Murray, 2004. "Alternative Input-Output Matrix Updating Formulations," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 135-148.
    2. Louis De Mesnard & Ronald E. Miller, 2006. "A Note On Added Information In The Ras Procedure: Reexamination Of Some Evidence," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 517-528, August.
    3. Theo Junius & Jan Oosterhaven, 2003. "The Solution of Updating or Regionalizing a Matrix with both Positive and Negative Entries," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 87-96, March.
    4. Mary O'Mahony & Marcel P. Timmer, 2009. "Output, Input and Productivity Measures at the Industry Level: The EU KLEMS Database," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(538), pages 374-403, June.
    5. Wenfeng Huang & Shintaro Kobayashi & Hajime Tanji, 2008. "Updating an Input-Output Matrix with Sign-preservation: Some Improved Objective Functions and their Solutions," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 111-123.
    6. Lourens Broersma & Ton Van Moergastel, 2007. "A Shortcut Method for Generating Time Series of Input Data for Productivity Analysis," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 277-293.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:dgr:rugggd:gd-116 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Anders Hammer Strømman, 2009. "A Multi-Objective Assessment Of Input-Output Matrix Updating Methods," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 81-88.
    3. Umed Temursho & Manuel Alejandro Cardenete & Krzysztof Wojtowicz & Luis Rey & Matthias Weitzel & Toon Vandyck & Bert Saveyn, 2020. "Projecting input-output tables for model baselines," JRC Research Reports JRC120513, Joint Research Centre.
    4. Andre Lemelin, 2009. "A Gras Variant Solving For Minimum Information Loss," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 399-408.
    5. Tamas Revesz, 2023. "A not sign-preserving iteration algorithm for the ‘Improved Normalized Squared Differences’ matrix adjustment model," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 31(1), pages 49-71, March.
    6. Andre Fernandes Tomon Avelino, 2017. "Disaggregating input–output tables in time: the temporal input–output framework," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 313-334, July.
    7. repec:dgr:rugsom:13017-gem is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Richard Wood & Konstantin Stadler & Tatyana Bulavskaya & Stephan Lutter & Stefan Giljum & Arjan De Koning & Jeroen Kuenen & Helmut Schütz & José Acosta-Fernández & Arkaitz Usubiaga & Moana Simas & Olg, 2014. "Global Sustainability Accounting—Developing EXIOBASE for Multi-Regional Footprint Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-26, December.
    9. Oosterhaven, J. & Bouwmeester, M.C. & Nozaki, M., 2013. "The impact of production and infrastructure shocks," Research Report 13017-GEM, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    10. Jan Oosterhaven & Michiya Nozaki, 2014. "The impact of production and infrastructure shocks to the Japanese inter-regional economy: A non-linear input-output programming approach," ERSA conference papers ersa14p163, European Regional Science Association.
    11. Roberto Mínguez & Jan Oosterhaven & Fernando Escobedo, 2009. "Cell‐Corrected Ras Method (Cras) For Updating Or Regionalizing An Input–Output Matrix," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(2), pages 329-348, May.
    12. Jakub Boratyński, 2016. "A Bayesian Approach to Matrix Balancing: Transformation of Industry-Level Data under NACE Revision," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 8(4), pages 219-239, December.
    13. Gordon, Peter & Park, JiYoung & Richardson, Harry W., 2009. "Modeling input-output impacts with substitutions in the household sector: A numerical example," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 696-701, May.
    14. Manfred Lenzen & Maria Cecilia Pinto de Moura & Arne Geschke & Keiichiro Kanemoto & Daniel Dean Moran, 2012. "A Cycling Method For Constructing Input--Output Table Time Series From Incomplete Data," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 413-432, February.
    15. Jeffrey C. Peters & Thomas W. Hertel, 2016. "Matrix balancing with unknown total costs: preserving economic relationships in the electric power sector," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 1-20, March.
    16. López, Xesús Pereira & de la Torre Cuevas, Fernando, 2023. "An alternative for tracing the path between supply and use tables in current and constant prices," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 293-302.
    17. Jan Oosterhaven & Johannes Többen, 2017. "Wider economic impacts of heavy flooding in Germany: a non-linear programming approach," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 404-428, October.
    18. Sargento, Ana Lúcia Marto & Lahr, Michael L. & Ferreira, João Pedro & de la Torre Cuevas, Fernando, 2024. "Revisiting methods for estimating interregional input-output accounts: It's not just about trade flows," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 664-677.
    19. Anthony T. Flegg & Guiseppe R. Lamonica & Francesco M. Chelli & Maria C. Recchioni & Timo Tohmo, 2021. "A new approach to modelling the input–output structure of regional economies using non-survey methods," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 10(1), pages 1-31, December.
    20. Wenfeng Huang & Shintaro Kobayashi & Hajime Tanji, 2008. "Updating an Input-Output Matrix with Sign-preservation: Some Improved Objective Functions and their Solutions," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 111-123.
    21. Schulte, Patrick, 2015. "Does skill-biased technical change diffuse internationally?," ZEW Discussion Papers 15-088, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    22. Thomas Wiedmann, 2017. "An input–output virtual laboratory in practice – survey of uptake, usage and applications of the first operational IELab," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 296-312, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gro:rugggd:gd-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hanneke Tamling (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ferugnl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.