IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

La philosophie sociale est-elle un no man's land ? Réflexions sur l'idée d'émancipation de l'économie politique

Listed author(s):
  • Marc Deschamps

    (Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, France
    CRESE
    BETA CNRS
    GREDEG CNRS)

  • Joël Thomas Ravix

    (Université Côte d'Azur
    GREDEG CNRS)

Le domaine de la philosophie sociale peut être vu, en suivant Hayek, comme un no man's land engendré par le processus d'autonomisation de la science économique et en particulier son émancipation de la politique. Cet article montre au contraire que, d'une part, ce processus ne répond pas à un souci de spécialisation mais se présente comme une réponse politique particulière visant à soumettre l'action politique à des impératifs économiques, et, d'autre part, qu'il existe une autre conception de l'économie politique qui, dans le prolongement de Hume et de Smith, lie étroitement économie et philosophie. Il en résulte que, dans un cas comme dans l'autre, l'idée hayékienne selon laquelle la philosophie sociale serait un no man's land s'évanouit.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.gredeg.cnrs.fr/working-papers/GREDEG-WP-2016-39.pdf
File Function: First version, 2016
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), University of Nice Sophia Antipolis in its series GREDEG Working Papers with number 2016-39.

as
in new window

Length: 25 pages
Date of creation: Dec 2016
Handle: RePEc:gre:wpaper:2016-39
Contact details of provider: Postal:
250, rue Albert Einstein, 06560 Valbonne

Phone: +33-493-954-172
Fax: +33-493-653-798
Web page: http://www.gredeg.cnrs.fr

More information through EDIRC

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

as
in new window


  1. Ludovic Ragni, 2011. "La méthode mathématique chez Walras et Cournot : comparaison et enjeux de discorde," Post-Print halshs-00727147, HAL.
  2. Hirshleifer, Jack, 1985. "The Expanding Domain of Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(6), pages 53-68, December.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gre:wpaper:2016-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Patrice Bougette)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.