IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id312.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Choosing not to Participate--Evidence from Drought-Prone Area Programme in Chitradurg, Karnataka

Author

Listed:
  • G.Ananda Vadivelu

Abstract

This paper examines the evidence on the constraints that farmers face in participating in a programme evolved by 'somebody else' viz, ‘the government’, . The paper begins with a discussion on the typologies on participation. In section two, the enquiry is located in the wider debate and the emerging critique of the participatory development discourse and the tyrannical nature that it is assuming. The paper then examines the historical ‘failure’ of the Drought Prone Areas Programme (DPAP). Policy issues are raised in the context of the findings and discusses the possible ways in which the watershed development programmes should be designed and funded.

Suggested Citation

  • G.Ananda Vadivelu, 2006. "Choosing not to Participate--Evidence from Drought-Prone Area Programme in Chitradurg, Karnataka," Working Papers id:312, eSocialSciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eSocialSciences.com/data/articles/Document1912006191.015872E-02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Finsterbusch, Kurt & Van Wicklin, Warren A, III, 1989. "Beneficiary Participation in Development Projects: Empirical Tests of Popular Theories," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 37(3), pages 573-593, April.
    2. Cohen, John M. & Uphoff, Norman T., 1980. "Participation's place in rural development: Seeking clarity through specificity," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 213-235, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pilar Useche, 2016. "Who Contributes to the Provision of Public Goods at the Community Level? The Case of Potable Water in Ghana," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 34(6), pages 869-888, November.
    2. Ghazala Mansuri, 2004. "Community-Based and -Driven Development: A Critical Review," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 19(1), pages 1-39.
    3. Siriluck Thammanu & Hee Han & E. M. B. P. Ekanayake & Yoonkoo Jung & Joosang Chung, 2021. "The Impact on Ecosystem Services and the Satisfaction Therewith of Community Forest Management in Northern Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-31, December.
    4. Palash Kamruzzaman, 2020. "Exploring the Nexus Between Participation and Empowerment," Journal of Development Policy and Practice, , vol. 5(1), pages 32-53, January.
    5. Meemana Jiraya, 2018. "Community Involvement and Ecotourism in Doi Inthanon National Park, Thailand," International Journal of Sciences, Office ijSciences, vol. 7(04), pages 46-55, April.
    6. Joseph Kwadwo Danquah & Farhad Analoui & Yvonne Ekua Deiba Koomson, 2018. "An evaluation of donor agencies’ policies on participatory development: The case of Ghana," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(S1), pages 138-158, March.
    7. von Braun, Joachim & Grote, Ulrike & Jütting, Johannes, 2000. "Zukunft der Entwicklungszusammenarbeit," Discussion Papers 280888, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
    8. Mbeche, Robert & Ateka, Josiah & Herrmann, Raoul & Grote, Ulrike, 2021. "Understanding forest users' participation in participatory forest management (PFM): Insights from Mt. Elgon forest ecosystem, Kenya," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    9. Shrestha, Sujata & Shrestha, Uttam Babu, 2017. "Beyond money: Does REDD+ payment enhance household's participation in forest governance and management in Nepal's community forests?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 63-70.
    10. Parvin Sultana & Paul Thompson & Colin Green, 2008. "Can England Learn Lessons from Bangladesh in Introducing Participatory Floodplain Management?," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 22(3), pages 357-376, March.
    11. Sara Kinsbergen & Dirk-Jan Koch & Christine Plaisier & Lau Schulpen, 2022. "Long-Lasting, But Not Transformative. An Ex-post Sustainability Study of Development Interventions of Private Development Initiatives," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(1), pages 51-76, February.
    12. Cornwall, Andrea, 2003. "Whose Voices? Whose Choices? Reflections on Gender and Participatory Development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 1325-1342, August.
    13. Deepak Lal, 1993. "Participation, Markets and Democracy," UCLA Economics Working Papers 705, UCLA Department of Economics.
    14. Abdalla, Fadhila Hassan & Samah, Asnarulkhad Abuu & Hashim, Ahmad Hariza & Rosnon, Moh’d Roslan, 2022. "Relationship between Socio-Economic Factors and Participation in Decision Making in Tourism Industry among Women in Zanzibar," OSF Preprints gs5re, Center for Open Science.
    15. Phusit Phukamchanoad, 2022. "The innovative approach to sufficiency economy in Thailand’s Northeastern region provinces," Journal of Community Positive Practices, Catalactica NGO, issue 1, pages 20-33.
    16. Jalaluddin Abdul Malek & Seng Boon Lim & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2021. "Social Inclusion Indicators for Building Citizen-Centric Smart Cities: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-29, January.
    17. Handberg, Øyvind Nystad, 2018. "No sense of ownership in weak participation: a forest conservation experiment in Tanzania," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(4), pages 434-451, August.
    18. Worstell, James & Colley, Barry, 1993. "Enabling Resilience and Enhancing Assets: Famine Mitigation from a Seeds and Tools Perspective," USDA Miscellaneous 336999, United States Department of Agriculture.
    19. Subhan Mollick, Abdus & Khalilur Rahman, Md. & Nabiul Islam Khan, Md. & Nazmus Sadath, Md., 2018. "Evaluation of good governance in a participatory forestry program: A case study in Madhupur Sal forests of Bangladesh," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 123-137.
    20. Neha Kumar, 2007. "Pro-Poor Targeting and Participatory Governance: Evidence from Central India," Boston University - Department of Economics - The Institute for Economic Development Working Papers Series dp-176, Boston University - Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Padma Prakash (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.esocialsciences.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.