IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id2804.html

CRISP Framework for Post-Project Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Bikram Gupta
  • Aparna Seth

Abstract

Development projects do not continue for infinite duration. Funding and implementing agencies withdraw from the program area after a certain point of time. Phasing out of programs is a critical phase fraught with several challenges. Most of the agencies and donors do not have a mandate for post-project evaluations and therefore commit little or no funds for post-project evaluations. Post-project evaluation examines if the project has led to sustainable outcomes and practices in the community. The paper outlines relevant case studies and explores challenges associated with post-project evaluations. It proposes a framework to address the envisioned objectives of post-project evaluation encapsulating sustainability of Community, Resources, Institutional and Processes (CRISP). It further suggests Difference-In-Difference research design for conducting post-project evaluation. [Discussion Paper No. 2]

Suggested Citation

  • Bikram Gupta & Aparna Seth, 2010. "CRISP Framework for Post-Project Evaluation," Working Papers id:2804, eSocialSciences.
    • Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:2804
    Note: Institutional Papers
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.esocialsciences.org/Download/repecDownload.aspx?fname=Document1292010290.9719202.pdf&fcategory=Articles&AId=2804&fref=repec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:wbk:wbpubs:13949 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:wbk:wbpubs:2693 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Beatrice Lorge Rogers & Kathy E. MacíasAuthor-X-Name-First: Kathy E., 2004. "Program Graduation and Exit Strategies: Title II Program Experiences and Related Research," Working Papers in Food Policy and Nutrition 25, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeremiah Mkomagi & Devotha Mosha & Athman Ahmad, 2022. "Beneficiaries’ attitudes towards resources withdrawal for selected donor-funded agriculture-related projects in Tanzania," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(3), pages 206-216, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:2804. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Padma Prakash (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.esocialsciences.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.