IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ess/wpaper/id12087.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Structural Change and Labour Productivity Growth in India: Role of Informal Workers

Author

Listed:
  • Rosa Abraham

Abstract

Labour productivity in an economy or industry may increase due to intrinsic increase in productivity (due to capital deepening or TFP growth) or due to the reallocation of workers to more productive sectors (structural change). Recent trends in the labour force indicate that workers are increasingly being engaged informally, in what may potentially be productivity dampening activities. In this context, this paper examines the productivity implications of the increasing informalisation of the Indian labour force by examining labour productivity by type of worker. The results show that although the movement of workers has been in the direction of relatively higher productivity sectors, the allocation of workers in employment types has not been towards the most productive activity/jobs in that new sector, instead, it has been towards relatively less productive informal activities. The increase in labour productivity from structural change is dampened as workers who move out of agriculture are employed in low productive activities in the non-agricultural sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosa Abraham, 2017. "Structural Change and Labour Productivity Growth in India: Role of Informal Workers," Working Papers id:12087, eSocialSciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:12087
    Note: Institutional Papers
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.esocialsciences.org/Download/repecDownload.aspx?fname=A201791117724_29.pdf&fcategory=Articles&AId=12087&fref=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barry P. Bosworth & Susan M. Collins, 2003. "The Empirics of Growth: An Update," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 34(2), pages 113-206.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ess:wpaper:id:12087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Padma Prakash). General contact details of provider: http://www.esocialsciences.org .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.